The Effect of E-book with Synectics Instructional Model on the Creative Thinking of Sixth-Grade Students with Different Learning Styles

Main Article Content

Yutthapon Pongputthachat
Associate Professor
Nammon Ruangrit

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to: 1) Compare the relative of creative thinking; pretest and posttest students with different learning styles. 2) Compare the relative of creative thinking between groups of students with different learning styles. 3) Study the students' satisfaction who have learned by E-book and Synectics instructional model. The samples of this research were 27 primary students of Anuban Suanphueng School. They were selected from Cluster Random Sampling and divided the groups of learners into three groups with a learning style: 1) Visual 2) Auditory 3) Kinesthetic. The instruments of this research were 1) Assessment form of learning style 2) Lesson plan 3) E-books of Visual art subject 4) Assessment form of creative artwork 5) Students' satisfaction assessment form toward the activities. The results of this research were as follows: 1) The creative thinking of students with different learning styles, posttest the learning higher scores than pretest learning there were significant differences at the level of .05 2) The creative thinking between students with different learning styles of three groups there were no significant differences at the level of .05 3) Satisfaction of students toward learning activities was at the high level.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

1. Almomani, J. (2019). "Preferred Cognitive Learning Patterns (VAK) Among Secondary Students Admitted to King Saud University and its Effect on their Academic Achievement in Physics." International Education Studies 2019, 12(5): 108-119.
2. Beasiri, S. (2007). A Development of a Training Program for Undergraduate Students with Art Activities to Develop Creative Thinking and Productive Skills. Doctor of Philosophy Program in Higher Education Graduate School Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
3. Bruce, J. & Marsha, W. (1996). Models of Teaching (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Chuenarrom, W. (2003). Development of the Performance Evaluation Form of Arts Learning Strand: Visual Art, Second Level. Master of Education in Research Graduate School Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
5. Educational Quality Assurance and Research Administration Division. (2016). Blueprint Thailand 4.0 Model : Propel Thailand's Economic and Social Development Towards Stability, Prosperity, and Sustainability. [Online]. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from https://www.nstda.or.th/home/knowledge_post/blueprint-thailand-4/
6. Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. New York: Harper and Row.
7. Ketlekha, W. (2014). A Study of Learning Achievement on Learning Unit of Creative art Thinking and Creativity of Prathomsuksa Four Students by Synectices Instruction and Invention Surrealism Art. Master of Curriculum and Instruction Program Graduate School Ratchasima Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
8. Kitsamut, J. (2014). A Development of Interactive Multimedia Using Synectics Instructional Process to Enhance Creative Thinking in Product Design for High School Students, Art Design Section, Assumption School. Master of Science in Industrial Graduate School King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi. (in Thai)
9. Munkham, S and Moonkham, O. (2002). 21 Methods of Learning: to Develop Thinking Processes. Bangkok: Parbpim Limited Partnership. (in Thai)
10. Office of Educational Reform and Office of the National Education Commission. (1999). National Education Act of B.E. 2542 (1999). Bangkok: Office of the National Education Commission. (in Thai)
11. Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education Plan (2017-2036). Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. (in Thai)
12. Panich, V. (2014). Build Learning into the 21st Century. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Siam Commercial Foundation. (in Thai)
13. Po Ngern, W. (2010). The development of a Knowledge Management System of Thai Art to Enhance Art Students' a Creative Thinking for Designing. Doctor of Philosophy Program in Higher Education Graduate School Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
14. Pummalai, M. (2012). Education in Thailand in the New Age, and Why? ... Popular to Use an E-book. [Online]. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/493357
15. Srifa, P. (2008). E-Book: Talking Books. Bangkok: Than Books. (in Thai)
16. Tangthanathanit, P. (2009). "E-book" a New Alternative to Electronic Instructional Media. [Online]. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from https://www.thairath.co.th/content/537444
17. Thammabus, M. (2001). “Learning Styles” Academic Journal 4(10): 6-14. (in Thai)
18. Yaemcharun, T. (2016). Cognitive Engagement and Learning Effectiveness with Interactive E-book. Master of Science Program Thesis Program in Information Technology in Business Graduate School Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)