(Evaluating Advocacy and Policy Change)

Authors

  • Rattana Buosonte -
  • Sirinnicha Deethung สาขาวิชาวิจัยและประเมินทางการศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร
  • Siripha Songkhram สาขาวิชาวิจัยและประเมินทางการศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร

Keywords:

Advocacy Evaluation, Policy Change, Evaluator Role, Technology for Advocacy Evaluation, Advocacy Impact

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to present a new concept of evaluation that has been mentioned in the professional evaluator communities or the evaluation used to make evaluations during the present and future periods. This evaluation is known as policy advocacy evaluation or advocacy and policy changes. The evaluation results will lead to changes in the policy of various organization units, especially government organizations. The authors present the contents of policy advocacy evaluation covering the history or development of the evaluation concept, definition, the nature of the evaluation, method of policy advocacy evaluation, the role of the evaluator, technology and advocacy evaluation, and trends of the evaluation.

References

Buosonte, R. (2007). Direction and Area of Evaluation. 2nd ed. Bangkok. Chulalongkorn

University Press. (in Thai)

Chapman, J., and Wameyo, A. (2001). Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy: A Scoping Study.

Prepared for ActionAid, with Funding from the UK Department of International

Development (DFID) and Comic Relief.

Coffman, J. (2007a). Undated PowerPoint Presentation of Advocacy Field Building. Author’s

Personal Archive. Copy in Possession of Author.

_______. (2009). Overview of Current Advocacy Evaluation Practice. Center for Evaluation

Innovation.

Fox, K., and Post, M. (2021). “Evaluating power building: Concepts and Considerations for

Advocacy Evaluators” in New Directions for Evaluation. Number 171 Fall 2021, 59-70.

Guthrie, K., Louie, J., David, T., and Foster, C. (2005). The Challenge of Assessing Policy and

Advocacy Activities: Strategies for a Prospective Evaluation Approach. Blueprint

Research and Design.

Gardner, A. L., and Brindis, C. D. (2017). Advocacy and Policy Change Evaluation: Theory and

Practice. Stanford University Press.

Kane, R., Levine, C., Orians, C., and Reinelt, C. (2021). “Contribution Analysis: A Promising

Method for Assessing Advocacy’s Impact” in New Directions for Evaluation. Number

Fall 2021, 45-57.

Lynn, J., and Mehta, T. (2021). “As Technology Disrupts Equity, Advocates Take Action:

Where do Evaluators fit in?” in New Directions for Evaluation. Number 171 Fall 2021,

-131.

Lemire, S.T., et al. (2012). “Making Contribution Analysis work: A Practical Framework for Handling Factors and Alternative Explanations”. Evaluation 18(3): 294-309.

Mayue, J. (2001) “Address-ing Attribution Analysis: Using Performance Measures Sensibly”. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16(1): 1-24

Obar, J., Zube, P., and Lampe, C. (2011). “Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in

the United States Perceive and use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic

Engagement and Collective Action”. Journal of Information Policy 2: 1–25.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advocacy_evaluation.pdf.

Patton, M. Q. (2008). “Advocacy Impact Evaluation”. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation

(9): 1–10.

Raynor, J., Coffman, J., Stachowiak, S., and Raynor, J. (2021). An Introduction to Policy

Advocacy Evaluation in New Directions for Evaluation. Number 171 Fall 2021, 11-18.

Sonia, S. T., Saltzman, A., and Spilker. S. (2021). “The art and Science of Developmental and

Advocacy Evaluation” in New Directions for Evaluation. Number 171 Fall 2021, 19-29.

Tsui, J., Hearn, S., and Young, J. (2014). Monitoring and Evaluation of Policy Influence and

Advocacy. Overseas Development Institute. Working Paper 395.

Taylor, E., Schiro-Biidabinikwe., and Cram, A. (2021). “Who Puts the Value in Evaluation? The Need for Self-reflection and Transparency in Advocacy and Policy Change

Evaluation” in New Directions for Evaluation. Number 171 Fall 2021, 83-94.

Wimbush, E., and et al. (2012). “Application of Contribution Analysis to Outcome Planning and Impact Evaluation”. Evaluation 18(3): 310-329.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-03

Issue

Section

บทความวิชาการ