Tutorial Study: The Consumption of Signs among Thai Students

Main Article Content

Nipaporn Thammason
Sorabud Rungrojsuwan


This study had two objectives. Firstly, it studied the concept of signs from tutorial study among high school students. Secondly, it studied about the factors that influenced the students to consume the concept of signs from tutorial study among high school students.

This research revealed 2 findings. Firstly, to gain knowledge and learning techniques from tutorial study, students could also benefit from enhanced confidence to succeed, comfort, and entertainment providing them with better chances for studying in the university (Undergraduate). Secondly, the factors that influenced the students to consume the concept of signs from tutorial study included the competition to study in the university, the educational system, friends and guardians that could also reflect their social aspects and styles of their consumption.

In conclusion, the tutorial institutions can promote the consumption of signs among students which they cannot find from schools. Therefore, in addition to providing knowledge for students, the tutorial institutions can provide the students with the sign of (1) hope and future (2) lifestyle and (3) motivation.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thammason, N. ., & Rungrojsuwan, S. . (2017). Tutorial Study: The Consumption of Signs among Thai Students. MFU Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 127–159. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MFUconnexion/article/view/241273
Research article


Bally, C. & Sechehaya, A. (1915) Course in general linguistics Ferdinand de Saussure, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Barthes, R. (1991) Mythology, New York: Noonday.

Baudrillard, J. (1981) For a critique of the political economy of the sign, St. Louis, MO: Telos Press.

Chantavanich, S. (2008) Sociological theory (ทฤษฎีสังคมวิทยา), Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Chiangkun, W. (2007) The report of Thai education (รายงานสภาวะการศึกษา), Available: http://www.witayakornclib.wordpress.com/ [25 December 2012] (in Thai)

Hawkes, T. (2004) Structuralism and semiotics, London: Routledge.

Kaewthep, K. & Hinviman, S. (2008) The stream of philosophers on political economy and mass media (สายธารแห่งนักคิดทฤษฎีเศรษฐศาสตร์การเมืองกับสื่อสารศึกษา), Bangkok: Phappim. (in Thai)

Kitratkorn, P. (2012) The inequalities of Thai education (ความเหลื่อมล้ำทางการศึกษาไทย), Available: http://www.rajabhatmetwork.com/ [25 December 2012] (in Thai)

Lane, R. (2000) Jean Baudrillard, London: Routledge.

Leeuwen, T. (2005) Introducing social semiotics, London: Routledge.

Poster, M. (1988) Jean Baudrillard: Selected writing, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Saetang, S. (2012, January) From apartment to education complex: Two sides of coin reflecting educational system (จากห้องแถวสู่ Education Complex เหรียญสองด้านสะท้อนระบบการศึกษา), Available: https://info.gotomanager.com/news/printnews.aspx?id=93881/ [1 November 2012] (in Thai)

Thai Publica. (2013) When quality of education plays important role on ‘scoring points’, parents pay more than ten thousand million for kids on tutorial study (เมื่อคุณภาพการศึกษาใช้ “คะแนนชี้วัด” ผู้ปกครองทุ่มปีละกว่าหมื่นล้านให้เด็กกวดวิชาเพื่อ “ติ๊กถูก”), Available: https://thaipublica.org/2013/09/quality-of-thai-education/ [25 October 2015] (in Thai)

Thai Publica. (2015) The top nine ranges of tutorial schools providing 300 branches all over the country: Expanding 200-300 branches during 7 years (รร.กวดวิชาโตไร้ขีดจำกัด 9 อันดับแรกมีสาขารวมกันเกือบ 300 แห่งทั่วประเทศ ช่วง 7 ปีที่ผ่านมาขยายปีละ 200-300 แห่ง), Available: https://thaipublica.org/2015/02/tutor-1/ [25 October 2015] (in Thai)

Todd, D. (2012) You are what you buy: Postmodern consumerism and the construction of self, Hohonu- A Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 10, pp. 48-50.