GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING FOR ETHICAL APPROVAL OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS REVIEW STANDARDS OF PHRANAKHON RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY

Abstract

This study aimed to examine guidelines for obtaining human research ethics approval in accordance with the Human Research Ethics Review Standards of Phranakhon Rajabhat University. It focused on investigating lecturers’ and researchers’ levels of knowledge and understanding of the ethical approval process, as well as approaches to enhancing such understanding. A mixed-methods research design was employed, with a sample of 365 lecturers and researchers from Phranakorn Rajabhut University. Data were collected through questionnaires and focus group discussions and analyzed using descriptive statistics, including percentages, means, and standard deviations.
The findings revealed that most participants had an adequate level of knowledge and understanding of the procedures for applying for Human Research Ethics approval. However, gaps in understanding were identified, particularly regarding the three categories of ethical review: exemption, expedited review, and full board review. These findings suggest the need for additional efforts to improve clarity and comprehension, such as providing informational materials in the form of infographics and organizing training programs.
In addition, the approaches to developing understanding can be summarized into three aspects. First, in terms of the capacity of lecturers, researchers, and staff, a lack of understanding regarding the preparation of relevant documents and required forms was identified. Second, in terms of administrative management, although the procedures for certification approval are clearly defined, dissemination and communication at the faculty level remain insufficient. Third, in terms of procedures and processes, delays and redundancies were identified; therefore, the process should be improved to enhance efficiency and reduce the approval timeframe.