ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING OUTCOMES FROM BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS–BASED LEARNING AMONG NON-BUSINESS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Main Article Content

Suebwong Kalawong
Sasiwimol ฺฺBuranarak
Nirat Petchrat
Paradorn Karnchanasutham

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) assess entrepreneurial learning outcomes following learning management using the Business Model Canvas and 2) compare entrepreneurial learning outcomes between students with and without income-generating experience. The sample consisted of 28 non-business students who were selected using a non-probability sampling method through convenience sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire on entrepreneurial learning outcomes, comprising three dimensions: 1) business understanding, 2) analytical and application skills, and 3) confidence in becoming an entrepreneur. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent-samples t-test at a statistical significance level of .05. The results showed that most of the participants were from the Political Science program, followed by Law, Design, and Business English. Most students were first-year students (46.4%), followed by second-year students (42.9%) and third-year students (10.7%). Regarding income-generating experience, the majority of students had previous income-generating experience (64.3%), while 35.7% had no such experience. Overall, the entrepreneurial learning outcomes were at a high level (M = 4.07, SD = 0.99). When considered by dimension, business understanding was at a high level (M = 4.07, SD = 0.93), analytical and application skills were at a high level (M = 4.08, SD = 1.06), and confidence in becoming an entrepreneur was also at a high level (M = 4.06, SD = 0.98). Furthermore, students with income-generating experience had higher mean scores than those without such experience across all three dimensions: business understanding (t = 0.93, p = .368), analytical and application skills (t = 1.56, p = .144), and confidence in becoming an entrepreneur (t = 0.62, p = .550). However, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the three dimensions at the .05 significance level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kalawong, S., ฺฺBuranarak S., Petchrat, N., & Karnchanasutham, P. (2026). ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING OUTCOMES FROM BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS–BASED LEARNING AMONG NON-BUSINESS UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal : Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(2), 161–177. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PNRU_JHSS/article/view/288441
Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Article)

References

Afxentiou, G., & Bezzaz, Y. (2025). Exploring the mental health of veterans and its impact on

entrepreneurial outcomes: A conceptual framework for future research. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 17(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-03-2025-0986

Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Alshammari, A. F. (2025). A conceptual model and its implications:

Identifying key factors influencing entrepreneurial activity and innovation capabilities for sustainable development and green innovation. World Development Sustainability, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2025.100259

Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/593884

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Cantamessa, M., & Montagna, F. (2016). Business model innovation. In M. Cantamessa & F. Montagna (Eds.), Management of innovation and product development (pp. 157–178). Springer.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

International Institute for Trade and Development (Public Organization). (2020). Business Model Canvas (BMC): Explaining the components of a business or project. https://www.itd.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/itdevent03022020-04.pdf

Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers, No. 2015/06. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cccac96a-en

Meehan, C., VonColln-Appling, C., Dasilva, M., Yocom, D., Stoltzfus, L. E., & Barker, N. (2026).

The impact of experiential learning on clinical judgment in prelicensure nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2026.01.026

Newman, A., et al. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature

on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012

Office of the National Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation Policy Council. (2026). The Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, through NXPO, showcases achievements in driving higher education, science, research and innovation policies, integrating budgets, developing human capital, and laying the foundation for enhancing the country’s innovation economy. https://www.nxpo.or.th/th/43212/

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.strategyzer.com/books/business-model-generation

Pratana Govittayangkull (2015). Developing 21st-century learning assessment skills among

early childhood teachers in Lampang Province. Journal of Social Innovation and Lifelong Learning, 9(2–4). https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/FEU/article/view/39034

Pattrawiwat, K., Jansem, A., Intarakamhang, U., Boocha, P., Azharuddin, S., Daovisan, H., &

Tuntivivat, S. (2025). The causal relationship model of intention and social entrepreneurial orientation behavior of students in Thailand. Social Enterprise Journal, 22(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2024-0197

Rocha, R. G., do Paço, A., & Alves, H. (2024). Entrepreneurship education for non-business

students: A social learning perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100974