THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE LEARNING PROCESS-BASED CULTURAL TOURISM INTERPRETATION OF KHAO PHRA WIHAN NATIONAL PARK

Main Article Content

Prasert Yothicar
Sangkae Punyasiri

Abstract

This research aimed 1) to investigate the current context of cultural tourism interpretation
of Khao Phra Wihan national park and the best practical interpretation of Khom-Khmer cultural tourism interpretive management, and 2) to create and check the development process of the learning process-based cultural tourism interpretation of Khao Phra Wihan national park. This research was qualitative; documentary research and in-depth interview were employed. The content analysis was applied for data analysis. The research results showed that the current context of cultural tourism interpretation of the park consists of: (1) the interpreters, such as the Office of National Park and Khao Pha Wihan national park, (2) the story of tourist attractions of the park, (3) interpretive media, such as visitor center, interpretive signs, website, and staffs of the park, and (4) tourists. Furthermore, the best practical interpretation of Khom-Khmer cultural tourism interpretive management is Angkor Wat temple, Cambodia. Also the interpretive management structure consists of three main sectors namely international communities, public sector, and private sector. In conclusion, the development process of the learning processbased cultural tourism interpretation of the park consists of: (1) the interpreters, such as the Office of National Park, Khao Pha Wihan national park, and tour companies, (2) the story of tourist attractions of the park, (3) interpretive media, such as visitor center, interpretive signs,
website, staffs of the park, and tour guides, and (4) tourists who are involved in the perception and learning about the interpretation of tourist attractions in the park.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Article)

References

Berlo, David K. (1960). The Process of communication: an introduction to theory and practice. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Caichompoo, S., Caichompoo, B. & Preechayakul, P. (2017). Tourism management information system of Khung Bangkachao Area, Phrapradaeng district, Samutprakan Province. Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal, Humanities and Social Sciences. 12(1), 90-99. (in Thai)

Chancharat, N. & Maneenetr, T. (2012). Tourism impacts from conflicts between Thailand and Cambodian case of Prasat Khao Phra Wihan. Journal of International and Thai Tourism.
8(2), 67-83. (in Thai)

Chanvirak, S. (2013). Managing interpretation at a UNESCO heritage site: a supplyside
perspective of Angkor Wat Temple, Cambodia. Master of Tourism Management, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Chettamart, S. (2002). Interpretation: a management tool for national park in Thailand. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from https://www.thailis.or.th/tcd/ (in Thai)

Department of Tourism. (2015). Interpretation in tourism destination for eco tourism, historical tourism and cultural tourism (a guideline for developing Interpretive planning in tourism destination). Bangkok: V.T.K. Printing. (in Thai)

Nindum, S.,Khunsri, J., Benchakorn, B.,Jeenaboonrueang, S., Jeenaboonrueang, N. & Chuenwong, P. (2017). The Development of Ethnic Traveling Routes in Chaing Rai Province. Phranakhon
Rajabhat Research Journal, Humanities and Social Sciences. 12(1), 26-37. (in Thai)

Chettamart, S. (2002). Interpretation: a management tool for national park in Thailand. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from https://www.thailis.or.th/tcd/ (in Thai)

Department of Tourism. (2015). Interpretation in tourism destination for eco tourism, historical tourism and cultural tourism (a guideline for developing Interpretive planning in tourism destination). Bangkok: V.T.K. Printing. (in Thai)

Nindum, S.,Khunsri, J., Benchakorn, B.,Jeenaboonrueang, S., Jeenaboonrueang, N. & Chuenwong, P. (2017). The Development of Ethnic Traveling Routes in Chaing Rai Province. Phranakhon
Rajabhat Research Journal, Humanities and Social Sciences. 12(1), 26-37. (in Thai)