GENDER ANALYSIS THROUGH THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES IN SOCIOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/aisr.2024.13Keywords:
Gender, Sex, Sociological Theoretical Perspective, Socio-Cultural SystemAbstract
Society is a complex network of human relationships, and gender relationships are an integral part of this social structure. Various theoretical perspectives have been developed to study human relationships within this context. This article has focused on exploring gender relationships using sociological theories. To achieve this goal, qualitative data have been collected using content analysis as part of a qualitative research design. The data have then analyzed and linked to the concept of gender through thematic categories based on sociological theoretical explanations. After analysis of theoretical assumptions as the data, it has been concluded that gender relationships manifest in diverse forms, revealing variations when it has been viewed through theoretical perspectives of sociology.
References
Abraham, F. (1998). Sociological thought Unknown Binding. Delhi: Macmillan India Limited.
Adhikari, S. (2020a). Vedic Aryan Society and Pattern of Production System. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 30(2), 228-235.
Adhikari, S. (2020b). Gender Issues in Vedic Social Structure. Tribhuvan University Journal, 35(1), 193-208.
Adhikari, S., Adhikari, B., & Acharya, G. (2024b). E-learning Method and University Life of Married Female Students in Patriarchal Social Structure in Sociological Perspective. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 51(1), 66-84.
Adhikari, S., Adhikari, B., Acharya, G., Dahal, S., Adhikari, B., & Sharma, T. (2024a). Glimpse of Ancient Social History through the Social Structure of The Mahabharata Period. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 34(1), 43-54.
Adhikari, S., Shrestha, I., Adhikari, B., & Mishra, A. (2024c). Social challenges of women workers in the hotel industry. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Arts and Humanities, 9(2), 48-54.
Bhasin, K. (1993). What is Patriarchy?. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Bilton, T., Bonnett, K., Jones, P., Skinner, D., Stanworth, M., & Webster, A. (1996). Introductory Sociology. (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
Bohannan, P., & Glazer, M. (1988). High Points in Anthropology. New York: Ealfred Aknoff.
Coser, L. (1996). Masters of Sociological Thought. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
David, M., & Liz, G. (2002). Sociology of families. New York: Sage Publishing.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (ed.). (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. New York: Sage Publications.
Ember, C., & Ember, M. (1999). Anthropology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Engels, F. (1902). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co.
Farley, J. (1999). Sociology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Haralambos, M., & Heald, R. (2010). Sociology. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Henslin, J. (1997). Sociology. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Krippendorff, K. (ed.). (2004). Content analysis. New York: Sage Publications.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradox of gender. New York: Yale University Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party. New York: International Publishers.
Matson, R. (2005). The Spirit of sociology. Singapore: Pearson Education.
Murdock, G. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan Publishers.
Neuman, W. (2007). Social research methods. London: Darling Kindersley.
Oakley, A. (1974). The Sociology of Housework. New York: Pantheon Books.
Ortner, S. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture?. In M. Rosaldo, & L. Lamphere. (eds.). Woman, culture, and society (pp. 68-87). California: Stanford University Press.
Ritzer, G. (1996). Sociological theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Ritzer, G. (2000). Classical sociological theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Tylor, E. (1988). Dictionary of anthropology. New Delhi: Ashwani Goyal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.png)
