BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE

Authors

  • Janjira SODSAI Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Thailand
  • Dararat PHOPRACHAK Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Thailand
  • Anek PUTTHIDECH Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Thailand
  • Kusuma DAMPITAKSE Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Thailand
  • Surachai AM-UGSORN Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/aisr.2025.43

Keywords:

Board Characteristics, Sustainability Disclosure, Sustainable Growth, Corporate Governance, Stock Exchange of Thailand

Abstract

In an era where corporate transparency increasingly dictates capital allocation, achieving sustainable growth remains a paramount objective for firms in emerging markets. This study investigates the complex mechanisms linking corporate governance to long-term viability by examining the mediating role of sustainability disclosure in the relationship between board characteristics and the sustainable growth of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Grounded in Agency Theory and Stakeholder Theory, the research employs a rigorous quantitative approach to analyze empirical data from Thai listed firms. The analysis tests explicitly the extent to which sustainability disclosure bridges the gap between internal governance structures—such as board independence and composition—and external economic performance. The empirical results reveal that sustainability disclosure functions as a critical mediator, significantly enhancing the positive impact of effective board characteristics on firm growth. These findings challenge traditional direct-effect models, suggesting that governance mechanisms translate into value creation primarily through transparent non-financial reporting. Consequently, this study offers actionable insights for regulators and directors, advocating that strengthening sustainability disclosure mandates is essential for leveraging board governance to achieve resilience and sustainable competitiveness in the dynamic Thai capital market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelmoneim, Z., & El-Deeb, M. (2024). BOD characteristics and their impact on the link between ESG disclosure and integrated reporting disclosure quality: A study of Egyptian non-financial firms. Future Business Journal, 10, 18.

Amatyakul, K., Pongsupatt, T., & Pongsupatt, A. (2021). Factors Affecting Sustainable Growth of Sustainable Investment Group in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of Buddhist Education and Research, 7(3), 77-91.

Ardila, D., & Safitri, H. (2024). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), and Firm Value on Stock Returns: ESG Sector Leaders Kehati and IDX80. Media Trend, 19(2), 298-312.

Babiker, I., Bakhit, M., Bilal, A., Abubakr, A., & Abdelraheem, A. (2025). The Effect of Female Representation on Boards on Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Highly Polluting Industries. Sustainability, 17(6), 2751.

Best, J. (1977). Research in education (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Bhattacharya, S., & Sharma, D. (2019). Do environment, social and governance performance impact credit ratings: A study from India. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(3), 466–484.

Chaiwong, D., Awirothananon, T., & Thanjunpong, S. (2019). The Effect of Board of Directors toward Sustainable Report Disclosures of Thai Listed Companies. Sisaket Rajabhat University Journal, 13(3), 76-90.

Chanthawong, W., Phoprachak, D., Putthidech, A., Dampitakse, K., & Am-Ugsorn, S. (2025). Sustainability Disclosure and Corporate Growth: An Empirical Study of Listed Thai Companies. Asian Interdisciplinary and Sustainability Review, 14(2), Article 7.

Chuiduang, A. (2019). Factors affecting the company’s sustainable growth: A case study of listed companies in the market for alternative investment (MAI). Master of Business Administration Thesis, Bangkok University.

Connelly, B., Certo, S., Ireland, R., & Reutzel, C. (2010). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.

Doane, D., & Seward, L. (2011). Measuring Skewness: A Forgotten Statistic?. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2), 1-18.

Elijido-Ten, E. (2022). Looking Beyond Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures: A Stakeholder Framework. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 23(3), 7-19.

ESG Advising LLC. (2024). Bloomberg’s ESG disclosure score. Retrieved from www.esg-advising.com/insights/bloombergs-esg-disclosure-score.

Freeman, R. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486-489.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Higgins, R. (1977). How Much Growth Can a Firm Afford?. Financial Management, 6(3), 7-16.

Issa, A., & Fang, H. (2019). The impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the Arab Gulf states. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 34(7), 577-605.

Janjarasjit, S., & Uthayapong, T. (2024). The Relationship between Board Composition and Audit Quality: A Case Study of Thai Listed Companies. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Nakhon Phanom University, 14(1), 81-99.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Lin, F., & Wu, C. (2024). Board characteristics and environmental performance. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 2454-2464.

Lin, Z. (2024). Does ESG performance indicate corporate economic sustainability? Evidence based on the sustainable growth rate. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(3), 485-493.

Nakprasit, C., & Rattanayong, P. (2020). The Influence of Board Characteristics on Business Ethics of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand: ESG 100. Dhammathas Academic Journal, 20(4), 121-132.

Nor, F., Ramli, N., Marzuki, A., & Rahim, N. (2020). Corporate sustainable growth rate: The potential impact of COVID-19 on Malaysian companies. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 17(3), 25-38.

Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). The role of ESG ratings in driving the Thai capital market towards sustainability. Retrieved from www.sec.or.th/TH/Template3/Articles/2567/241267.pdf.

Oprean-Stan, C., Oncioiu, I., Iuga, I., & Stan, S. (2020). Impact of sustainability reporting and inadequate management of ESG factors on corporate performance and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 12(20), 8536.

Phengphit, P., Sarapaivanich, N., & Sukthomya, D. (2023). The Effect of Gender of Board of Directors and Corporate Governance on the Level of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. MUT Journal of Business Administration, 20(2), 153-173.

Phunchanathorn, N., & Saengkhiew, P. (2021). The influence of good corporate governance and social responsibility affecting firm's performance of energy and utilities group of the listed companies on The Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 8(8), 77-89.

Rahardjo, T., Bangun, N., & Amalia, T. (2020). Effect of Firm Size, Gearing Ratio, and Gender Diversity on Extent of Risk Disclosure. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 2584-2598.

Senawut, P., & Povatong, B. (2023). ESG Implementation in Housing Development of Companies Listed on Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Sarasatr, 6(3), 686-698.

Smith, A. (1937). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House Inc.

Sodsai, J., Phoprachak, D., & Putthidech, A. (2024). The Influence of Ownership Structure on Corporate Performance through the Disclosure of Sustainability Reports by Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange. The Journal of Accounting Review, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, 9(2), 184-202.

Sripavatakul, C., Yodbutr, A., Bangmek, R., & Sumritsakun, C. (2023). The Relationships between Shareholder Structure, Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidencefrom The Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). Sisaket Rajabhat University Journal, 17(2), 130-145.

Teng, X., Wang, Y., Wang, A., Chang, B., & Wu, K. (2021). Environmental, Social, Governance Risk and Corporate Sustainable Growth Nexus: Quantile Regression Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10865.

The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (n.d.). Good corporate governance. Retrieved from www.set.or.th/en/about/overview/cg.

United Nations in Thailand. (n.d.). UN support for the sustainable development goals in Thailand. Retrieved from https://thailand.un.org/th/sdgs.

Wanganusorn, B., Tulasombat, S., & Thechatakerng, P. (2022). Agent Theory: Challenges of Business Administration in Thailand. Journal of Business Administration, Maejo University, 4(1), 1-22.

Yodbutr, A. (2023). Board Composition and Sustainability Disclosures: The Empirical Evidence from Listed Firms in The Market for Alternative Investment. RMUTL Journal of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, 11(2), 73-92.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

SODSAI, J., PHOPRACHAK, D., PUTTHIDECH, A., DAMPITAKSE, K., & AM-UGSORN, S. (2026). BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE. Asian Interdisciplinary and Sustainability Review, 14(2), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.14456/aisr.2025.43