Political Control of Bureaucracy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss the relationships between bureaucracy and democratic politics under the mutual context about the tension between the bureaucracy and the democratic ethos. This article imposes the crucial argument that, how the bureaucracy, which is the undemocratic mechanism, could be existed with the execution of democratizing political processes and public authority, and what should it be its appropriate political control. According to the mentioned questions, this article starts by exploring the concept of bureaucracy pointed out the logics, set of values, and the roles of bureaucratic system which could dispute with democratic principles. Later, the article argues about the Principal-Agent Theory proposing the controlling mechanisms for the bureaucratic system such as elected-politician controlling. At the end of the article, the author presents the political control of bureaucracy using the Governance framework, and discusses about the potentiality and the possibility of alternative controlling mechanisms for bureaucracy including of: (1) using internal values of the bureaucracy, (2) realization of democratic representation, (3) controlling by Board of Director, and (4) controlling by the network.
Article Details
References
2. Antonio, R.J. (1979). The contradiction of domination and production in bureaucracy: the contribution of organizational efficiency to the decline of the Roman
Empire. American Sociological Review, 44, pp. 895-912.
3. Banks, Jeffrey S. (1989). Agency budgets, cost information, and auditing. American Journal of Political Science. 33, pp. 670-699.
4. Banks, Jeffrey S., & Weingast, Barry R. (1992). The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information. American Journal of Political Science. 36(2), pp. 509-524.
5. Bendor, Jonathan, Serge Taylor, and Roland Van Gaalen. (1987). Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Asymmetric Information. American Journal of Political Science. 31, pp.796-828.
6. Blumstein, mes F. (2001). Regulatory Review by the Executive Office of the President: and Overview and Policy Analysis of Current Issues. Duke Law Journal. 51(3), pp. 851-899.
7. Calvert, Randall., McCubbins, Mathew D., & Weingast, Barry R. (1989). A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion. American Journal of Political Science. 33(3), pp. 588-611.
8. Caplan, B. (2007). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose bad Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Carrasco, G. (1991). Democracy’s interest in groups: Interest group corporatism and democratic theory. Master’s thesis. Simon Fraser University, Ottawa.
10. Christensen, J.G. (1999) Bureaucratic Autonomy as A Political Asset. Presented Paper at the Workshop Politicians, bureaucrats and institutional reform, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops Mannheim, March 26-31. From https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/ec2df240-7984-43fc-bfc5-8e5ca1ad5756.pdf.
11. Corder, Kevin. (2003). Structural Choice and Political Control of Bureaucracy : Updating Federal Credit Programs. In Politics, Policy and Organization : Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy. Edited by George A. Krause; & Kenneth J. Meier. pp. 233-258. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
12. Dworkin, Ronald (1997). Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963, 1993). The political systems of empires: A study of bureaucratic societies. Glencoe: The Free Press.
14. Farazman, A. (1989). Bureaucracy, the State and Revolution in Modern Iran: Agrarian Reform and Regime Politics. New York: Praeger.
15. Farazman, A. (2009). Bureaucracy and Administration. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.
16. Farazman, A. (2010) Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis. Public Organization Review, 10, pp. 245-258.
17. Henisz, W.J. (2004). Political Institutions and Policy Volatility. Economics and Politics. 16(1), pp.1-27.
18. Hood, C., James, O., Peters, B. G., & Scott, C. (2004). Controlling modern government. Cheltenham: Edward Elger.
19. Huber, J., Shipan, C.R. & Pfahler, M. (2001). Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), pp. 330-345.
20. Kagan, Elena. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review. 114(1), pp. 2245-2385.
21. Kelly, K. (2007). New View on North-South Relations of Imperialism. In A. Farazmand. Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis. Public Organization Review, (2010). 10, pp. 245-258.
22. Lessig,Lawrence; & Sunstein, Cass R. (1994). The President and the Administration. Columbia Law Review. 94(1), pp. 1-123.
23. Mair, Peter. (2006). Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy. New Left Review, 42, pp.25-51.
24. Marini, Frank. (1971). Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
25. Meier, K. J. & Nigro, L. G. (1976). Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives. Public Administration Review. 36(4), pp. 458-469.
26. Meier, K., & O'Toole, L. J. (2006). Bureaucracy in a Democratic State A Governance Perspective. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
. (2006). Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate. Public Administration Review. 66(2), pp. 177-192.
27. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Philip D. Zelikow., & David C. King. (1997), Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit in transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
29. Peters, B. Guy. (2010). Bureaucracy and Democracy. Public Organization Review. 10, pp.209-222.
30. Pierre, Jon, & B. Guy Peters. (2000). Governance, Politics, and the State. London: Macmillan.
31. Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Routledge.
32. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33. Riggs, F. (2009). Bureaucracy: A profound puzzle for Presidentialism. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Bureaucracy and Administration (pp. 155-203). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
34. Rohr, John A. (1986). To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of Administrative State. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
35. Rothstein, B. (2008). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus the quality of governance. QoG working paper 2008: 2. Gothenberg: Quality of Governance Institute, University of Gothenberg.
36. Stephenson, Matthew C. (2005). Legislative Allocation of Delegated Power: Uncertainty, Risk, and the Choice between Agencies and Courts. Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 506.
37. Stephenson, Matthew C. (2008). Optimal Political Control of the Bureaucracy. Michigan Law Review. 107(1), pp. 53-110.
Strauss, Peter L., & Sunstein, Cass R. (1986). The Role of the President and OMB in Informal Rulemaking. Administrative Law Review. 38, pp.181-208.
38. Waldo, D. (1948). The Administrative State. New York: Ronald.
39. Waldo, D. (1955). The Study of Public Administration. New York: Random House.
40. Waldo, D. (1971). Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
41. Waldo, D.(1992). The enterprise of public administration. Novato: Chandler and Sharp.
42. Wamsley ,Gary L. (1990). “The Agency Perspective: Public Administrators as Agential Leaders.” In Refounding Public Administration, edited by Wamsley et al., pp.114-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Weber, Max. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Translated and edited by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Weber, Max. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. (trans: Parsons, A.M., Parsons, T.). New York: Free Press.
45. Wood, B. Dan., & Waterman, Richard W. (1991). The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review. 85(3), pp. 801-828.