Administering Operations of the Sub-District Administrative Organisation in Khon Kaen Province with Regard to Public Value Management Paradigm
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research was to investigate the water-scarceness solving operations in Sawang village by the Pawaenang Sub-District Administrative Organisation, Khon Kaen Province’s Banfang District being relevant to the Public Value Management Paradigm, and to search for paradigmatic bound. Qualitative technique was utilised. 15 persons were key informants. Theoretical-based Typological Analysis was used entirely as data analysis technique. The findings were that the organisation studied had executively operated mainly with regard to the Public Value Management Paradigm in every fundamental procedure, except for the external stakeholder participation in collective activity on solving water scarceness. The previous executive’s transparent accountability seemed likely to be significantly the major public value in administering performances - searching for the preferable value, operational capacity and legitimate authorisation, respectively. Such values as satisfaction, equity and public legitimacy emerging within the steps of value searching and achieving effectiveness. Whilst efficiency has been relative to shareholders’ feelings of trust and confidence to the organisation studied and external provision-agency who delivered satisfactorily purified water, as a public service, to this village. There was not any paradigmatic bound. Remarkably, a new dimension of public value significantly found, which has not been appeared within this paradigm, in terms of benevolently-valuable-effectiveness - as purified water has also been generously allocated to external society by courtesy of the village’s committee.
Article Details
References
ภาษาไทย
วินัยชาญ สรรพโรจน์พัฒนา. (2560). คุณค่าสาธารณะ: ระบบอภิบาลในการจัดการภาครัฐ. วารสารนวัตกรรมการจัดการภาครัฐและภาคเอกชน, 5(2), 3-23.
ภาษาอังกฤษ
Alford, J. (2002). Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337-346.
Alford, J., and Hughes, O. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130-148.
Alford, J., and O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 171-191.
Benington, J. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Vakue. in J. Benington and M. Moore (eds), Public Value Theory and Practice (31-51), Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Grant, Bligh, et al (2014). Public Value. summary background paper prepared for the Local Government Business Excellence Network, October 2014, Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.
Greene, Jeffrey D. (2005). Public Administration in the New Century. Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.
Hughes, O. (2006). The New Pragmatism: Moving beyond the Debate over NPM. presented at the 10th Annual International Research Symposium on Public Management, 10-12 April 2006, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.
Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value in inside: What Is Public Value Creation?. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192-219.
Moore, Mark H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Morrell, K. (2009). Governance and the Public Good. Public Administration, 87, 3, 538-556.
Nixon, Mark. (2014). Creating Public Value: Transforming Australia’s Social Services. The synopsis summarises EY, Australia.
O’Flynn, Janine. (2009). From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 1-48.
Rhodes, Rod A.W. (1994). The Hollowing out of the State: the Changing Nature of Public Service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138-151.
Smith, RFI. (2004). Focusing on Public Value: Something New and Something Old. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 68-79.
Stoker, Gerry. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(41), 41-57.
Turkel, Eli, and Turkel, Gerald. (2016). Public Theory: Reconciling Public Interests, Administrative Autonomy and Efficiency. Review of Public Administration and Management, 4(2), 2-7.
Williams, Iestyn, and Shearer, Heather. (2011). Appraising Public Value: Past. Present and Futures. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.