Criminal Mediation in the Police Investigation Phase: Implementation Challenges and Solutions for Restorative Justice in Thailand’s Metropolitan Police

Main Article Content

Chetsadaphong Khamchu
Sunee Kanyajit

บทคัดย่อ

This study aim to 1) examines the current operational challenges and obstacles facing criminal dispute mediation during police investigations, 2) develops practical approaches for enhancing these mediation processes to improve their effectiveness and implementation at the investigation stage.This study employed qualitative research through in-depth interviews with 58samples, including 37 practitioners, 18 service recipients, 3 policy officers and supplemented by focus group discussions with 9 experts.


The findings revealed four categories of problems and limitations:  1) structural barriers, including inadequate legal frameworks and organizational constraints; 2) operational challenges in implementation procedures; 3) personnel issues encompassing training and capacity gaps; and 4) resource management obstacles, including budget and facility limitations. These barriers resulted in informal mediation processes that often replaced the formal legal procedures mandated by the Act. To systematically address operational problems and barriers, researchers proposed the B.R.I.D.G.E. model (Bureau Structure Reform, Regulatory Framework Enhancement, Integration and Coordination, Digital Transformation, Governance and Quality Assurance, Empowerment of Human Resources) synthesized from empirical findings, emphasizing digital transformation as crucial for bridging policy-to-practice gaps.


The research serves as a policy framework for developing restorative justice processes, recommending drafting new regulations encompassing online mediation and electronic systems, establishing mediator databases, case tracking systems, online mediation platforms, fostering inter-agency collaboration through memoranda of understanding, establishing mediator standards, curriculum development with educational institutions, and clear career advancement pathways to enhance dispute mediation effectiveness within the Metropolitan Police Bureau area.


 

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Khamchu, C., & Kanyajit, S. (2026). Criminal Mediation in the Police Investigation Phase: Implementation Challenges and Solutions for Restorative Justice in Thailand’s Metropolitan Police. วารสารวิชาการวิทยาลัยบริหารศาสตร์, 9(1), 200–221. สืบค้น จาก https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SASAJ/article/view/283406
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Braithwaite, J. (2020). Restorative justice and reintegrative shaming. In C. Chouhy, J. C. Cochran, & C. L. Jonson (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explanation and effects (pp. 281-308). United Kingdom: Routledge.

Chavez, P., Cinco, C., & Drennan, D. (2015). Restorative Justice: Review of Existing Literature. International Norms and Best Practice. Students Learning with Communities. Retrieved from https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=comlinkoth

Chomluk, T., Limawirachapong, A., & Changkham, R. (2023). Efficiency of enforcement of the Mediation Act B.E. 2562 at the investigation level. Journal of Criminology and Forensic Science, 9(2), 100-117. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/forensic/article/view/265660

Department of Rights and Liberties Protection. (2022). Annual report 2022. Ministry of Justice, Thailand. Retrieved from https://ww2-api.rlpd.go.th/File/Documentcontent/07837922-8526-4d4f-f74a-08dae3c3fb9e/20221222092650.pdf

Dispute Mediation Act, B.E. 2562 (2019). (2019, 22 May). Royal Thai Government Gazette. No. 136 Part 67 A, pp.1-22.

Glubwila, S. ., Lerwongrat, K., & Khruakham, S. . (2020). Comparative Study on Conflict Management and Reconciliation of ASEAN Countries. Journal of Behavioral Science for Development, 12(2), 139–157. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JBSD/article/view/222684

Fulham, L., Blais, J., Rugge, T., & Schultheis, E. A. (2023). The effectiveness of restorative justice programs: A meta-analysis of recidivism and other relevant outcomes. Criminology & Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231215228

Kimbrell, C. S., Wilson, D. B., & Olaghere, A. (2022). Restorative justice programs and practices in juvenile justice: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis for effectiveness. Criminology & Public Policy, 22(4), 887-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12613

Ministry of Justice. (2021). Research findings indicate "restorative justice" helps reduce recidivism, aims to reduce court backlogs and prison overcrowding. Retrieved from https://www.moj.go.th/view/59238

Nascimento, A. M., Andrade, J., & Rodrigues, A. de C. (2022). The psychological impact of restorative justice practices on victims of crimes—a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1930-1947. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085

Patchim, T. (2020). The restorative justice results in the juvenile investigation. Journal of Criminology and Forensic Science, 6(2), 1-15. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/forensic/article/view/245242

Pratheuangrattana, C. (2021). The Public Sector Dispute Mediation According to the Mediation Act in 2562 B.E. (A.D. 2019): Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Thai Justice System, 14(3), 1–18. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/250757

Procter-Legg, T., Hobson, J., & Quimby, E. (2024). Restorative justice and social justice: An international perspective. Contemporary Justice Review, 27(2), 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2024.2414953

Romero-Seseña, P. (2024). Applicability and uses of the online environment in restorative mediation: Towards a digital restorative justice? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2319919

Thanyasiri, P. (2022). Conflict Resolution through the Restorative Justice and Peaceful Resettlement by Thai Law Enforcement Authorities. NKRAFA Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10, 45–59. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KANNICHA/article/view/257753

The National Reconciliation Commission. (2020). Appropriate approaches for conflict management through restorative justice and peaceful means by law enforcement agencies. Retrieved from https://www.moj.go.th/attachments/20201103092727_24949.pdf

Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1976). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Group & Organization Studies, 1(2), 249-251.

https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117600100214

Walgrave, L. (2019). Restorative justice in severe times: Threatened or an opportunity? New Criminal Law Review, 22(4), 618-644. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2019.22.4.618