A Semiotic Exploration of Human Language: Nature, Characteristics, and Linguistic Equality

Sarath Samaranayake

Authors

Sarath Samaranayake Department of International Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University

Keywords:

Communication, Human language, Linguistic diversity, Semiotics, Sign systems

Abstract

Human language is a complex semiotic system that facilitating communication and distinguishing humans from other species. This article examines human language through a semiotic perspective, incorporating foundational theories from Ferdinand de Saussure and Charles Peirce. It investigates how signs, symbols, and interpretation shape linguistic communication and critiques notions of linguistic superiority by advocating for linguistic equality. The study synthesizes existing semiotic theories while incorporating recent discussions on multimodal communication and linguistic diversity. A case study illustrating semiotic principles in a real-world communication scenario highlights the practical application of semiotics, elucidating how messages are transmitted through signals (any message sent from one party to another) and channels (mediums used to transmit these signals). The findings emphasize the necessity of recognizing all human languages as equally valuable within their respective cultural contexts, rejecting the idea of linguistic superiority based on structural, historical, or biological factors. This study contributes to contemporary semiotic debates and language inclusivity by integrating theoretical and applied perspectives.

References

Agustia, K. T. S., & Kurniawan, I. B. (2022). Semiotic analysis on non-verbal language in gadget digital advertisements. Journal Ahli Muda Indonesia, 3(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.46510/ jami.v3i2.104

Baker, A., Bogaerde, B. V. D., Pfau, R., & Schermer, G. M. (2016). The linguistics of sign languages: An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Baldwin, C., Chapman, C., & Gray, Z. (2007). Minority Rights: The Key to Conflict Prevention Minority Rights Group International.

Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01707.x

Barrett, T. A., & Dovchin, S. (2019). Critical inquiries in the sociolinguistics of globalization. Multilingual Matters.

Bloch, B., & Trager. G. L. (1942). Outline of linguistic analysis. Linguistic Society of America.

Bowcher, W. L. (2018). The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguist, 5(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0055-y

Chandler, D. (2019, January 8). Semiotics for beginners. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~chazelle/courses/BIB/semio2.htm

Chibaka, E. F. (2018). Advantages of bilingualism and multilingualism: Multidimensional research findings. In B. S. Chumbow (Eds.), Multilingualism and Bilingualism (pp. 2–7). Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74625

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. M.I.T. Press.

Cottier, C. (2023). How do Absolute Space and Sense of Direction Affect Different Languages? Discover Magazine. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/ how-absolute-space-and-sense-of-direction-affect-different-languages

Dickinson, D., McCabe, A., Clark-Chiarelli, N., & Wolf, A. (2004). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness in low-income Spanish and English bilingual preschool children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(3), 323–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001158

Dunn, M., Greenhill S. J., L. S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). The evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473(7345), 79–82. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature09923

Elpers, E., Jensen, G., & Holmes, K. J. (2022). Does grammatical gender affect object concepts? Registered replication of Phillips and Boroditsky (2003). Journal of Memory and Language, 127, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104357

Fatemi, S. M. (2014). Semiotics, Overview. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_396

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2011). An introduction to the language. Wadsworth.

Gałkowski, A., & Kopytowska, M. W. (2018). Current Perspectives in Semiotics. Peter Lang Group AG. http://doi.org/10.10.3726/b14638

Halliday, M. A. K. (2010). Introduction: On the "Architecture" of Human Language. In M. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), On Language and Linguistics (pp. 1–30). Bloomsbury. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474211932.0005

Hutson, J., Ellsworth, P., & Ellsworth, M. (2024). Preserving linguistic diversity in the digital age: a scalable model for cultural heritage continuity. Journal of Contemporary Language Research, 3(1). 10–19. https://doi.org/10.58803/jclr.v3i1.96

Kreidler, C. W. (1998). Introducing English semantics. Routledge.

Lancaster University. (2017, May 2). Language shapes how the brain perceives time. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170502112607.htm

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Li, J., & Karakowsky, L. (2001). Do we see eye-to-eye? Implications of cultural differences for cross-cultural management research and practice. The Journal of Psychology, 135(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603715

Lyons, J. (1981). Language and linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J., & Le Page, R. B. (1981). Language and speech and discussion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 215–222. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2395736

Malik-Moraleda, S., Mahowald, K., Conway, B. R., & Gibson, E. (2023). Concepts Are Restructured During Language Contact: The Birth of Blue and Other Color Concepts in Tsimane’-Spanish Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 34(12), 1350–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09567976231199742

Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (2017). An integrative semiotic methodology for IS research. Information and Organization, 27(1), 17−36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.12.001

Moerdisuroso, I. (2017). Social Semiotics and Visual Grammar: A Contemporary Approach to Visual Text Research. International Journal of Creative and Arts Studies. 1. 80. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v1i1.1574.

Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 369(1651), 20130299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299

National Geographic Society. (2024). Sign Language. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/ resource/sign-language/

Ollerhead, S. (2019). Teaching across semiotic modes with multilingual learners: Translanguaging in an Australian classroom. Language and Education, 33(2), 106−122. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09500782.2018.1516780

Pagel, M. (2017). Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve, and why should we care? BMC Biology, 15(64), 1−6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0405-3

Pinker, S. (1995). The language instinct. Harper Perennial.

Pirot, K. S., & Ali, W. I. (2021). Common Misconceptions about Sign Language. Journal of the University of Riparian. 8(3), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(8).No(3).Paper6

Qadha, A. M., & Mahd, H. S. (2019). The use of images for teaching abstract words versus concrete words: A semiotic study. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 287–298. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.19

Robins, R. H. (1980). General Linguistics. Indiana University Press.

Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press.

Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics. Philosophical Library.

Shashkevich, A. (2019). The power of language: How words shape people, culture. StanfordReport. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2019/08/the-power-of-language-how- words-shape-people-culture

Simoes, D., & Hautz, E. A. (2024). Semiotics and language: A philosophical-linguistic vision. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.002-034.

Stawarska, B. (2015). Saussure's philosophy of language as phenomenology: Undoing the doctrine of the course in general linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign. Cambridge University Press.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2024, May 31). Sign language. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/sign-language

The Peirce Edition Project, De Tienne, A., Eller, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Clark, C. L., & Davis, D. B. (Eds.). (1998). Nomenclature and divisions of triadic relations, as far as they are determined. In The Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (1893-1913) (pp. 289–299). Indiana University Press.

Thellefsen, M. M., Thellefsen, T., & Sørensen, B. (2018). Information as signs: A semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations. Journal of Documentation, 74(2), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2017-0078

Thellefsen, M., & Friedman, A. (2023). Icons and metaphors in visual communication: The relevance of Peirce's theory of iconicity for the analysis of visual communication. Public Journal of Semiotics, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2023.10.24762

UNESCO Office Bangkok and Regional Bureau for Education in Asia and the Pacific. (2008). Improving the quality of mother tongue-based literacy and learning: Case studies from Asia, Africa, and South America. UNESCO Bangkok.

United Language Group. (2017). The Sapir Whorf Hypothesis and Language's Effect on Cognition. https://www.unitedlanguagegroup.com/learn/the-sapir-whorf-hypothesis-and-languages-effect-on-cognition

Yakin, H. S. M., & Andreas, T. (2014). The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247

Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1971). Language teaching texts. Oxford University Press.

Zlatev, J. (2018). Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0001