Development of Creative Tourism Activities Based on Indigenous Rice Cultural Ecology in Ban Nam Yen, Dansai District, Loei Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Creative tourism has increasingly emphasized the use of cultural and natural capital as important resources for community-based tourism development. Ban Nam Yen, Dansai District, Loei Province, possesses indigenous rice varieties and traditional rice-related knowledge that reflect the cultural ecology and local identity of the community. These resources provide opportunities for developing creative tourism based on indigenous rice and the community’s natural and cultural assets. Therefore, this research aimed (1) to explore creative tourism resources based on the cultural ecology of indigenous rice and (2) to develop creative tourism activities grounded in the cultural ecology of indigenous rice in Ban Nam Yen, Dansai District, Loei Province.
Methods: The study employed Participatory Action Research (PAR), involving collaboration among researchers, community members, and local administrative agencies. A qualitative research methodology was used to collect and develop information through brainstorming sessions and in-depth interviews. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants with relevant knowledge and expertise, including community leaders, village committee members, local wisdom practitioners, community representatives, local government representatives, and tourism scholars or experts. These participants provided information, opinions, recommendations, and development guidelines throughout the fieldwork process. Data were analyzed using content analysis with inductive reasoning, and the findings were presented through descriptive narration. Research instruments included guiding questions for SWOT analysis and structured prompts for brainstorming activities.
Results: The findings identified five creative tourism sites based on the cultural ecology of indigenous rice: (1) the Indigenous Upland Rice Learning Center, (2) the Indigenous Rice Cultivation Cultural Learning Site, (3) the Natural Resources and Local Food Learning Site at Phupha Phueng, (4) the Seasonal Agricultural Learning Area, and (5) nearby tourism attractions. Creative tourism activities were developed based on three dimensions. The first was seasonal agricultural tourism, including studying indigenous rice varieties, practicing traditional hole-seeding rice cultivation, crop maintenance, seasonal fruit planting and harvesting, and coffee bean collection. The second was nature-based tourism, including forest trekking, tree planting, herbal plant studies, and scenic appreciation. The third focused on local ways of life, culture, traditions, and beliefs, including mushroom and bamboo shoot foraging, collecting seasonal vegetables, traditional frog catching and fish trapping, preparing wild and local cuisine, rice-based food processing workshops, producing rice-based souvenir products, and participating in the “Heet Sib Song” or Twelve-Month Merit-Making Traditions. Two tourism packages were developed: a One-Day Trip and a Two-Day, One-Night program.
Application of this study: The findings can be applied as guidelines for planning and developing Ban Nam Yen as a sustainable community tourism destination. The identified tourism resources and activities can also serve as learning resources for students and educational institutions, particularly for field-based learning related to local culture, agriculture, natural resources, and sustainable tourism. Furthermore, the participatory management approach can support community involvement in tourism planning, resource conservation, responsibility sharing, and equitable distribution of tourism benefits.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates that indigenous rice and its cultural ecology can serve as important foundations for developing creative tourism in Ban Nam Yen. Community participation plays a significant role in fostering appreciation, pride, and stewardship toward local tourism resources and the conservation of indigenous rice varieties. Participatory management also promotes shared responsibility and equitable benefit distribution among stakeholders. The findings contribute to the development of a tourism model that seeks to minimize environmental impacts and conserve natural ecosystems, particularly through Green Tourism or Ecotourism, thereby supporting sustainable tourism development in the community.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Agrinewsthai. (2024). Sticky rice from Loei Province, a GI product (Geographical Indication), is considered the ultimate mountain sticky rice. https://www.agrinewsthai.com/did-you-know/153536
[2] Kochakot, Y., Sripuna, S., & YamYim, W. (2016). Development of a database of geographical information systems for native rice species in Ban Nam Yen, Kok Satan Subdistrict, Dan Sai District, Loei Province. Research Fund Office.
[3] National Tourism Policy Committee. (2023). National Tourism Development Plan 2023 - 2027. Ministry of Tourism and Sports.
[4] Loei Provincial Statistics Committee. (2023). Loei Provincial Statistics Development Plan 2023 - 2027. National Statistical Office. Academi, 8(3), 427–441.
[5] Chitralada Technology Institute. (2024, November 27). Introduction to Geographical Indication (GI). https://www.cdti.ac.th/introduction-to-geographical-indication-gi/
[6] Rojanapornthip, J. (2024, November 27). Rice Department” showcases “Siew Kliang, the top GI glutinous rice of Loei: The ultimate high-value rice and authentic Isan identity. Khaosod. https://www.khaosod.co.th/technologychaoban/techno-news/article_289654
[7] Nantanakorn, P., & Jansuri, A. (2020). A Study on the Situation of Food Tourism Management in Old Town, Phuket Province. Journal of Arts and Service Industry Kasetsart University, 5(1), 135–153. management in the case study of community organizations in Krabi and Phatthalung provinces. Journal of Roi Kaensarn
[8] Srithong, P., Siriphakdi, P., Mattayombood, W., & Srisomphong, P. (2022). Guidelines for developing competitiveness in the management of hiking tourism in the upper northern provinces. Journal of Community Development and Quality of Life, 10(3), 250–262.
[9] Lekakul, J., Kwakong, N., Lisawatratanakul, D., & Suthipisan, S. (2021). The integration of the philosophy of sufficiency economy and the concept of creative tourism in order to develop the potential of tourism resources. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 26(1), 154–165.
[10] Wittayapak, C. (2018). Human ecology: the study of the environment in the dimensions of society and culture. Research Management Center, Chiang Mai University.
[11] Duangwises, N. (2021). Cultural ecology. https://shorturl.at/YbFuU
[12] Sattayanurak, A. (2017). Open your eyes and open your mouth from "farmers" to "operators." Matichon.
[13] Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of space. Blackwell.
[14] Kanchanaphan, A. (2017). Thailand studies with Thai people and neighbors. Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
[15] Ministry of Education. (2009). Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2008. Khuru Sapa Lat Phrao.
[16] Rittikupt, W. (2018). Community-based learning management: The effective learning management strategy of teachers in the 21st century. Journal of Graduate Studies of Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, 11(3), 179–191.
[17] Maratphaktramas, R., Yamaim, S., & Lapiei, A. (2023). Driving community participation in sustainable self-management in the case study of community organizations in Krabi and Phatthalung provinces. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 8(3), 427–441.