The Role of Participatory Communication in Driving Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Case Study of Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market in Narathiwat Province

Main Article Content

Sakiroh Yaena Benharoon
Hamdia Mudor

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Communication is an important mechanism for promoting community participation and providing opportunities for people to take part in the development process. This study aimed to analyze the participatory communication process for sustainable community-based tourism management, using the Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market, Narathiwat Province, as a case study.
Methods: This qualitative study employed non-participant observation and in-depth interviews with 12 key informants, comprising three government officials, five members of the Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market Committee, two local youths, and two traditional dessert vendors. The informants were purposively selected based on their direct experience and their ability to provide information relevant to the research objectives.
Results: The findings revealed that the participatory communication process at the Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market consisted of three key stages: (1) Planning stage, the process was initiated by the community committee, which recognized the potential of the area to be developed as a tourist destination to generate income while preserving traditional desserts and the cultural identity of the Malay community; (2) Implementation stage, community forums, group meetings, and LINE groups were used as primary communication channels to provide opportunities for community members and stakeholders to exchange information, share ideas, and propose development approaches, with emphasis placed on respecting local identity and context; and (3) Monitoring and evaluation stage, the community was provided with opportunities to participate in monitoring the progress and outcomes of the implementation, with the information and feedback obtained being used to continuously improve the process.
Application of this study: The findings can be applied as a guideline for designing communication processes to promote community-based tourism. The community committee can serve as a central mechanism for coordinating collaboration among community members, government agencies, and stakeholders. Face-to-face and digital communication channels can be used in combination to facilitate information exchange, joint decision-making, and monitoring and evaluation. These efforts should be undertaken alongside the preservation of cultural identity and local wisdom to strengthen community capacity and support the continuous development of community-based tourism.
Conclusions: Participatory communication plays an important role in supporting sustainable community-based tourism management. The process comprises interconnected stages of planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation, with the Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market Committee serving as a key mechanism for coordinating participation among community members and relevant agencies. This process not only supports tourism development and income generation but also contributes to preserving the community’s cultural identity amid rapidly changing social contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Benharoon, S. Y., & Mudor, H. (2026). The Role of Participatory Communication in Driving Sustainable Community-Based Tourism: A Case Study of Yakang Khanom 100-Year-Old Floating Market in Narathiwat Province. Parichart Journal, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.55164/pactj.v39i5.283182
Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Benharoon, S. Y., & Mudor, H. (2024). Participatory communication through “Hukum Pakat”: A case study of Ban Bannangluwa community-based tourism management in Yala Province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Thonburi University, 18(1), 100–115. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/trujournal/article/view/271933/ 181966 (In Thai)

[2] Post Today. (2019, April 25). Getting to know “secondary cities” the 55 provinces, worth visiting. https://www.posttoday.com/lifestyle/587425 (In Thai)

[3] Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2022). The 13th National Economic and Social Development Plan (2023-2027). Office of the Prime Minister. (In Thai)

[4] Benharoon, S. Y., & Mudor, H. (2022). Communication for community-based tourism management in the southern border provinces (Research Report). Faculty of Communication Sciences, Prince of Songkla University. (In Thai)

[5] Moayerian, N., McGehee, N. G., & Stephenson Jr, M. O. (2022). Community cultural development: Exploring the connections between collective art making, capacity building and sustainable community-based tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 93, 103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103355

[6] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

[7] Chaiphanphong, S. (2020). Community-based tourism management: Comparative study between four perspectives of luster, stakeholder, social networks and new public management. The Journal of Sirindhornparithat, 21(2), 307–325. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsrc/article/view/247371/168253 (In Thai)

[8] Puja, I. B. P., & Aryasih, P. A. (2020). Tourism and community. A study of community based tourism in Mandala Wisata Wanara Wana Ubud. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism, 6(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.22334/jbhost.v6i1.203

[9] Kuakhai, S., Tokaew, W., & Iamnirun, T. (2022). Communication for community-based tourism management in Tamot, Phatthalung Province. Journal of Southern Technology, 15(2), 1–11. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_sct/article/view/249684/176379 (In Thai)

[10] Sangrungruengroj, P. C. (2013). Participatory communication management: A mechanism for the implementation of the alternative development paradigm. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUSOKKU), 30(2), 23–42. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HUSO/article/view/32227/27517 (In Thai)

[11] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[12] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

[13] Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301

[14] Sutheewasinnon, P., & Pasunon, P. (2016). Sampling strategies for qualitative research. Parichart Journal Thaksin University, 29(2), 31–48. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/parichartjournal/article/view/69461/56396 (In Thai)

[15] Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.

[16] Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(73), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6

[17] Pinthapataya, S. (2021). Interviews for qualitative research. Journal of Business and Industrial Development, 1(3), 1–3. https://ojs.kmutnb.ac.th/index.php/bid/article/viewFile/5681/3869 (In Thai)

[18] Kubai, E. (2019). Reliability and validity of research instruments. NMK Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335827941_Reliability_and_Validity_of_Research_Instruments_Correspondence_to_kubaiedwinyahoocom

[19] Downe-Wambolt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006

[20] Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Development Education, 44(1), 26–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095

[21] Anusonphat, N., & Leenawrat, I. (2021). Development of self-sufficiency community economy on basis of community democracy. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 8(12), 204–217. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/257658/172095 (In Thai)

[22] Huedhun, K. (2017). The influence of LINE application in the present communication. Journal of Arts Management, 1(2), 75–88. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jam/article/view/138093/102709 (In Thai)

[23] Suacharoen, K., Boonsiri, K., & Torkaew, W. (2024). Management of cultural tourism network communication with community participation. Journal of Academic for Public and Private Management, 6(1), 14–31. https://so02.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/appm/article/view/263690/180025 (In Thai)

[24] Otto, H., & Fourie, L. M. (2016). Theorising participation as communicative action for development and social change. Communicare, 35(1), 21–39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309014279_Theorising_participation_as_communicative_action_for_development_and_social_change_Communicare_Journal_for_Communication_Sciences_in_Southern_Africa_Communicare_Tydskrif_vir_Kommunikasiewetenskappe_in

[25] Sriko, T., Tokeaw, W., Kantaboon, K., & Suchivoraseth, J. (2023). The communication for increasing participation in community development of Sub-district Administrative Organization in Chiang Rai Province. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 11(6), 2467–2479. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/271077/180463 (In Thai)

[26] Pharcharuen, W., Jaiphet, C., & Rungsee, P. (2022). Participation of the people in organizing a community forum to develop a plan for the development of Don Kaeo Sub-district Administrative Organization, Mae Rim district, Chiang Mai Province. Journal of Peace Periscope, 3(1), 1–11. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPP/article/view/381/163 (In Thai)

[27] Satria M, D., Subhani, & Ginting, R. P. (2024). Participatory communication in community-based tourism development in Bireuen. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 2127–2130. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/80d8/fe01e07ec8315105a22cff7dcb5b8d808204.pdf