Local Identity and Community-Based Public Policy Design: Concepts, Processes, and Strategic Potential
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In a world where public policymakers must confront complex problems and the dynamics of diverse societies, concepts rooted in local identity are becoming important reference points in contemporary public policy design. This article aims to present the concepts, processes, and potential of applying local identity to community-based public policy design. It seeks to connect state objectives with the values, needs, and local contexts of people in the community, while emphasizing the importance of understanding the distinctive characteristics, cultural foundations, and social conditions of each locality as a basis for developing public policies that are responsive to local circumstances and community needs.
Methods: The article employs a review and synthesis of relevant concepts and literature, together with an analysis of illustrative cases in Thailand and other countries. The analysis covers the meaning and components of identity, the development of community-based policy, differences between policy processes that take identity into account and centralized policies, as well as limitations and potential for application. Conceptual diagrams and a comparative table are also presented to explain the relationships between identity, policy processes, and systemic outcomes, considering identity as something that changes with the experiences and contexts of communities.
Results: The synthesis indicates that local identity comprises the collective memory dimension, the physical dimension, the social dimension, and the policy dimension, which are linked to problem definition, communication, and citizen participation. Five key strategic capacities include transforming local knowledge into policy information, supporting dynamic policy thinking, creating a shared cognitive framework, stimulating motivation for participation, and framing policy issues and instruments in alignment with community values. These capacities lead to policies that respond flexibly to local contexts, social legitimacy and acceptance, reduced resistance to the state, collaboration between the state and communities, and the continuity of identity amid change. However, application still faces limitations arising from centralized structures, symbolic participation, attitudes that devalue local wisdom, community vulnerability, and difficulties in translating cultural values into laws, budgets, and projects.
Application of this Study: Policymakers, local administrative organizations, and communities can use this conceptual framework to jointly define problems, design communication that reaches citizens, promote participation throughout the policy process, and undertake joint monitoring and evaluation, by linking local knowledge with decision-making authority, resources, and appropriate instruments while promoting shared learning and respecting diversity.
Conclusions: Local identity is a strategic resource for designing policies that are effective, meaningful to citizens, and adaptable. Such policy design requires the state to open up space and relies on trust and shared responsibility, enabling policies to grow sustainably alongside community values.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Strandberg, C., & Styven, M. E. (2024). The multidimensionality of place identity: A systematic concept analysis and framework of place-related identity elements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 95, Article 102257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102257
[2] Aini, D. N., Umpi, R., & Rahman, A. A. (2024). The vital role of civics: Understanding local identity and preserving cultural heritage in promoting local culture: An ethnographic study in Sumberdem Village, Malang Regency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(2), 283–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i2.5386
[3] Bell, E., & Lui, E. (2023). Integrating identity in policy design theory. Policy and Politics, 51(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16587888968118
[4] Deeprasert, J., Yimprasert, U., & Siririn, J. (2024). Soft power of local identity to drive community-based tourism in Rai Khing Municipality as creative economy to add value and sustainability. Journal of Arts Management, 8(3), 231–251. (In Thai)
[5] Hanyut, T., & Kaencandra, V. (2024). Local identity in the literature of Sawdapoi, Nan Province. RMUTL Journal of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, 12(1), 165–184. (In Thai)
[6] Odrakiewicz, S. (2014). The origins of local identity. WSB University in Wroclaw.
[7] Epstein, T. (2016). The relationship between narrative construction and identity in history education: Implications for teaching and learning. Educar em Revista, 32(60), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.46024
[8] Rueangsuk, V., Thongkaew, S., & Boonthawee, A. (2024). Cultural capital: Identity, beliefs, and local wisdom in Ban Pho District, Chachoengsao Province. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 29(4), 293–308. (In Thai)
[9] Barkat, I., Ayad, H., & Elcherif, I. (2019). Detecting the physical aspects of local identity using a hybrid qualitative and quantitative approach: The case of Souk Al-Khawajat District. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(4), 1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.11.005
[10] Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(6), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6
[11] Wang, L., Cui, S., Li, Y., Huang, H., Manandhar, B., Nitivattananon, V., Fang, X., & Huang, W. (2022). A review
of the flood management: From flood control to flood resilience. Heliyon, 8(3), Article e11763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11763
[12] Biresan, V., & Thirumurugan, V. (2025). Historical interpretation of societal cohesion in Tamil temples. Morfai Journal, 4(4), 1540–1548. https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v4i4.2420
[13] Yanpisit, K. (2022). Phu Tai textiles as a culture heritage of the nation. Asian Journal of Traditional and Innovative Arts and Textiles, 1(2), 61–83.
[14] Korontzis, T. C. (2024). State-bureaucracy-national security. International Multilingual Journal of Science and Technology (IMJST), 9(4), 7285–7290.
[15] Permana, A. Y., & Wening, N. (2024). The influence of groupthink and bounded rationality in decision-making on public policy. Journal of Universal Studies, 4(3), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1086
[16] Ibrahim, S. S., Ab Halim, A., Adnan, Z. H., & Jawan, J. A. (2023). A combined top-down and bottom-up approaches to the implementation of human trafficking policy in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(16), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i16/18759
[17] Mwilongo, N. H., Kaamo, K. J., & Ezekiel, T. (2025). Challenges in public policy implementation in Local Government Authorities: Who to blame for policy failure? Eminent Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.70582/v1j9cq87
[18] Pearnpitak, K. (2021). The independence of local authorities on the problem of governance of the state. King Prajadhipok's Institute Journal, 18(3), 5–16.
[19] Banda, J. H. K. (2025). A comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and influence of participatory models in advancing sustainable community development: A rigorous assessment of theoretical foundations and real-world applications. Social Science and Management, 2(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3027
[20] Rijal, S. (2023). The importance of community involvement in public management planning and decision-making processes. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.27
[21] Jing, G. (2024). Examining the nexus between local governance structures and college students’ cultural identity
and confidence–Take Zhejiang as an example. Journal of Local Self-Government, 22(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.1.153-174(2024
[22] Tovmasyan, N. T. (2025). History memory and civic identity discourses in the region (On the example of Khanty-mansi Autonomous Okrug Yugra). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, 4, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2025-4-1652
[23] Kuch, H. (2024). Centralization tendencies in participatory planning. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 17(2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v17i2.885
[24] Omobowale, O., Koski, A., Olaniyan, H., Nelson, B., Egbokhare, O., & Omigbodun, O. (2024). Effective community
entry: Reflections on community engagement in culturally sensitive research in Southwestern Nigeria. BMJ Global Health, 9(6), Article e015068. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015068
[25] Saukkonen, P. (2021). Cultural policy and cultural diversity. In The Nordic economic, social and political model: Challenges in the 21st century (pp. xx–xx). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026690-9
[26] Díez-Calvo, S., Lidón, I., Rebollar, R., & Gil-Pérez, I. (2025). Problems of participatory processes in policymaking: A service design approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 39(3), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2024-0137
[27] Kurmalasari, T., Samin, R., Habiba, S., Atmadinata, A., Zaitun, Z., Patria, R., Mustado, M., & Musliha, M. (2024).
Traditional medicines in the Malay community based on local wisdom. SHS Web of Conferences, 205, Article 02009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420502009
[28] Urbaite, G. (2024). The impact of globalization on cultural identity: Preservation or erosion? Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.69760/f9g3vn77
[29] Chow, J. C. (2020). Strategic policy design: A practitioner’s guide to statecraft. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009009
[30] Szanto, T., & Krueger, J. (2019). Introduction: Empathy, shared emotions, and social identity. Topoi, 38(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09641-w
[31] Brower, M. P. (2024). Reframing gendered issues: Intersectional identity frames and policy agendas. Political
Behavior, 46(1), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09833-y