EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT QUALITY OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE BASIC EDUCATION COMMISSION IN UPPER NORTHEAST
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the factors and study factors that influence the difference of educational management quality in secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission in the upper northeast. The multi-case comparative design of qualitative research was used for this study. The purposive selection was applied for choosing the 9 different qualities of secondary schools considered from the 3rd round of external quality assessment criteria score. The educational quality assessment report was collected together with interview and observation techniques for data collection. The data were analyzed by interpretive understanding.
The results of this study found that: The factors influencing the difference of educational management quality in secondary schools were 6 factors. 1) Administrators factor, the working of factors consisted of (1) administration and management ability (2) having a broad vision (3) academic leadership (4) transformational leadership and (5) focusing on school based management by holding the principles of decentralization and emphasizing on participation. 2) Teachers factor composed of (1) professional respect, compassionate and caring disciples, being a good model for students, self-improvement and adaptability to parents and community (2) having ability for teaching and (3) participation. 3) The student factors included (1) self-development (2) ability to adapt and change. 4) The parent factors consisted of (1) participation (2) cooperation and (3) supervision and promotion of student learning. 5) The school board factor was participation. Finally, 6) the community factors included (1) participation and (2) collaboration.
Article Details
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Chantavanich, S. (2008). Qualitative research (20th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Daengfu, S. (2013). The relationship between administration skills of administrators and educational management quality of Ban Arunothai school, Chiangmai province. Master's independent study education. Chiang Mai University. [In Thai]
Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Education Administration, 43(4), 338-356.
Dunyakasem, U. (2010). President of Silpakorn University. Retrieved December 31, 2017, from https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/336461 [In Thai]
Heck, R. H., Larsen,T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal mode. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94-95.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory research and practice (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jantavanich, A. (2004). Administrative guidelines and development of schools to quality schools. Bangkok: Prikwaan Graphic. [In Thai]
Jensen, J. L., & Rodgers, R. (2001). Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 235-246.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2011). Guidelines for quality assessment in accordance with the basic educational standard for internal quality assurance. Bangkok: National Buddhism Office. [In Thai]
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2013). The school administrative manual in the corporate administrative development program. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. [In Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2014). Research report of guidelines for the development of Thai education and the preparation for the 21st Century. Bangkok: Prikwaan Graphic. [In Thai]
Office of Reform. (2012). Reform of education reform of Thailand. Nonthaburi: TQP. [In Thai]
O’Neal, S. W. (1987). Classifying job characteristics of educational administrators an examination of satisfier and motivators. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(9), 3269-A.
Piromruen, S., & Chatchawarat, P. (2009). The development of educational quality of secondary schools in the Northeast with competency comparable process. Journal of Administration and Development Mahasarakham University, 1(2), 104-113. [In Thai]
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership and excellence in schooling. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 4-13.
Shipe, D. A. (1998). A case study about Total Quality Management in a school district: From selection to reflection (participatory management, continuous improvement). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(12), 3699-A.
Wesaracht, P. (2002). Principles of educational management: Administrator training package. Compiling Content, 24(2), 1-30. [In Thai]
Wiratchai, N. (2002). Reform process for improving learning quality: Evaluation and assurance. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister. [In Thai]