Independence Security and Performance Security of the Office of the Attorney General
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research paper aims to study (1) the of independence and the performance security of the of the Office of the Attorney General (2) the condition of the security of independence and the performance of the Office of the Attorney General and (3) to seek appropriate solutions to the problems of security of independence and the performance of the Office of the Attorney General. The researchers used the qualitative research methodology by using 3 methods of data collection, namely document research, in-depth interviews of 20 people and focus group discussion of 10 people, and analyzed the data by using content analysis techniques.
The research results found that the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 Section 248, the Public Prosecutors Act B.E. 2553 and the prosecution of the Office of the Attorney General are not in accordance with the security of independence and the performance of duties of the Office of the Attorney General. Therefore, it must be rectified for the Office of the Attorney General to have an agency responsible for the administrative work with autonomy in administration. The Committee of Administrative Officers shall have powers and duties in relation to the personnel administration of administrative officials. And the Legal Operation shall be separated from the administrative administration to be Legal Work department in each Case Office.
Article Details
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Good Governance. (2012). Governance for Executives. Retrieved from http://www.chumphon.doae.go.th/goodgovern.pdf [In Thai]
Kemthong, B. (2017). Basic concepts and theories in the Constitution. Retrieved from https://library2.parliament.go.th/ebook/content-issue/2558/hi2558-065.pdf [In Thai]
Khumpharat, P. (1991). Structural reform in criminal justice System: A case study of the public prosecution department. Master’s Thesis of Law, Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai]
Naikowit, P. (1996). Administration of criminal justice by prosecutors. Thailand National Defence College. [In Thai]
Office of the Attorney General. (2016). Rules of the Office of the Attorney General on the Criminal Proceedings of the Prosecutors, B. E. 2547. Retrieved from http://www.stat.ago.go.th/ระเบียบการดำเนินคดีอาญา.pdf [In Thai]
Office of the Civil Service Commission. (2008). Announcement of the Civil Service Commission on preparation of standards, determination of positions and placement of civil servants of all government agencies line of work and position level according to the positioning standards. Retrieved from https://www.ocsc.go.th/sites/default/files/attachment/page/standard_newpos.pdf [In Thai]
Phungsuwandamrong, P. (2011). Independence of public prosecutor organization. Master’s Thesis of Law, Thammasat University. [In Thai]
Ponlawan, K. (2016). Constitutional Prosecutor’s Independence Protection. Retrieved from http://www.stat.ago.go.th/บทความลงเว็บ/บทที่%205.htm [In Thai]
Thongsomboon, N. (2010). Public prosecutor’s organ as the Constitutional Organs. Master’s Thesis of Law, Thammasat University. [In Thai]
Wongyai, W. (2008). The Independence of public prosecutor’s organization follows provisions of the Constitution 2550 B.E.. Master’s Thesis of Law, Mae Fah Luang University. [In Thai]
Yaisawang, A. (2016). Prosecutors and the protection of people’s rights and freedoms under the rule of law and the Legal State. Retrieved from http://www.constitutional court.or.th/occ_web/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=1251 [In Thai]