The Influence of Team’s Leader on Perceived Team’s Performance: A Case Study of Thai Premier League
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study, firstly, is to explore the influence of team’s leader on team norms, effective team and perceived team performance, secondly to investigate the influence of team norms on effective team and team perceived team performance and finally to examine the influence of effective team on perceived team performance. Both qualitative and quantitative data are designed to gather simultaneously. Qualitative data beginning with an in-depth interview key informants in Thai premier leagues and then providing and collecting questionnaire 550 from team’s members in Thai premier leagues. LISREL is used to analyze the structural equations to find out the answers to research objectives and hypotheses.
The findings are that team’s leader has positive influence on team norms, effective team and perceived team performance, and team norms has positive influence on effective team and perceived team performance, and also effective team has positive influence on perceived team performance respectively. Originality/Value, it is found that the effective team has the most influence on perceived team performance and this result can be applied in Thai premier leagues by focusing on building an effective team to support both efficiency and effectiveness in organizations.
Article Details
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual leader form, rater, and scoring key for MLQ. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Bolman, L., G. & Deal, T. E. (1994). Looking for leadership: Another search party’s report. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(1), 77-96.
Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (1999). Management: Building competitive advantage (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Carron, A. V. (1988). Group dynamics in sport: Theoretical and practical issues. London: Spodym.
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. London: Collier Macmillan.
Levi, D. (2011). Group dynamics for team (3rd ed.). New Bury Park, CA: Sage.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). California: Crisp.
Mickan, S., & Rodger, S. (2000). The organisational context for teamwork: Comparing health care and business literature. Australian Health Review, 23(1), 179-192.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Builletin, 115(2), 210-227.
Munroe, K., Estabrooks, P., Dennis, P., & Carron, A. (1999). A phenomenological analysis of group norms in sport teams. The Sport Psychologist, 13(2), 171-182.
Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, Osborn, R. N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Vecchio, R. P. (1998). Organizational behavior. Chicago: Dryden Press.
Woodcock, M. (1989). Team development manual. London: Routledge.
Woodcock, M., & Francis, D. (1994). Teambuilding strategy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.