The Development of a Performance Evaluation Model for Lecturers at Private Higher Education Institutions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research article purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the appraisal framework for instructors of private universities, (2) to create an appraisal model on instructors’ performance of private universities, and (3) to evaluate the proposed model for instructors of private universities. The research methodology was in the following three steps. Step One was the study of the conditions and problems in the performance evaluation of the lecturers under study. Step Two was the construction of a performance evaluation model for these lecturers. Step Three was the evaluation of the model constructed in Step Two by implementing it.
The results revealed that: (1) The study of the appraisal framework for instructors of private universities founded that the existing appraisal framework for instructors of private universities was in appropriated and insufficiently to represent in every areas. (2) The creation of an appraisal model on instructors’ performance of private universities founded that an appraisal model on performance consisted of Components of an appraisal model on instructors’ performance of private universities consisted of 6 components knowledge and ability component, operation component, student service/academic service component, management component, moral, ethics, and teachership component, and cultural preservation component and The evaluation of the proposed model for instructors of private universities founded that each instructors performance could be identified clearly.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Announcement of the Ministry of Education: Higher education standards B.E. 2561. (2018). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 135 (Special 199 D), 19-21. [In Thai]
Bernardin, H. J., & Russel, E. A. (1998). Human resource management: An experimental approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M. (1993). An introduction to teacher appraisal. Cassell.
Buosonte, R. (2010). Personnel evaluation: Using evaluation and the role of evaluator. Naresuan University Journal, 18(2), 91-96. [In Thai]
Burstein, L., Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1992). Education indicators. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed., pp. 409-418). Macmillan.
Dessler, G. (2009). A framework for human resource management (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Ivancevich, J. M. (2010). Human resource management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Johnstone, J. N. (1981). Indicator of education systems. Kogan Page.
Kovilaikool, S. (2004). System analysis for higher education institution administration. Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Education. [In Thai]
Maisutha, A., & Sachuckorn, S. (2008). Performance appraisal (12th ed.). Technology Promotion Association (Thai-Japanese). [In Thai]
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.
Nitko, A. J. (1996). Educational assessment of students. Prentice Hall.
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2007). Private Higher Education Institutions Act, B.E. 2546 amendments B.E. 2550. Author. [In Thai]
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2008). University senior executive development program 20th class. Author. [In Thai]
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2018). Guidelines for promoting the quality of teaching and learning. of teachers in Higher Education Institutions. Author. [In Thai]
Parapob, J. (2004). The development of 360 degree feedback system for human resource management of the faculties in Rajabhat University. Doctoral Dissertation of Education, Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai]
Rachanawan, J. (2003). Top 10 Private Universities. Wannasan. [In Thai]
Ministry of University Affairs. (1996). Regulation (circular) B.E. 2519-2538. Author. [In Thai]
Sinlarat, P. (1999). Teaching assessment: Rules and methods in university level. Journal of Education, Chulalongkorn University, 10(2), 92-104. [In Thai]
Suwanadee, W. (1998). Private education national research draft of Education Act. Office of the National Education Commission. [In Thai]
Thongaram, P. (2009). The development of a performance evaluation system for private university professors based on the concept of standardized assessment and performance compensation. Doctoral Dissertation of Education, Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai]