Utilizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools for Improving Academic Writing: Thai EFL Learners’ Perspectives
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article to study explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)
in teaching academic writing. It focuses on three main areas: (1) comparing students’confidence levels before and after using AI tools for academic writing, (2) identifying the most frequently used AI tools, and (3) examining students’ perspectives on AI assistance. The research involved 104 fourth-year English majors at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University and utilized a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were gathered through a rating form, while qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data were analyzed, using Braun and Clarke (2006) thematic analysis, while the quantitative data were analyzed, using descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and paired t-tests.
Findings are as follows: indicated a significant increase in students’ confidence in their
academic writing after using AI tools, with ChatGPT being the most popular choice. Overall,
students expressed positive views about AI tools, although they noted some limitations in their
use.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Ahmad, D., Latif, I., Arafah, B., & Suryadi, R. (2024). Defining the role of artificial intelligence in improving English writing skills among Indonesian students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 568-578.
Aroonmanakun, W. (2024). Know and understand AI: Linguists’ perspectives. Chulalongkorn University. [InThai]
Bezjak, S. (2024). Perceptions and perspectives: Understanding teachers’ attitudes towards AI in education. In Artificial Intelligence for Human-Technologies-Economy Sustainable Development (pp. 68-74). Lublin, Poland. Retriveved from https://toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-31-4/68.pdf
Boonyaratthanasoontorn, P. (2017). An investigation of Thai students’ English language writing difficulties and their use of writing strategies. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 111–118.
Bransen, M. (2024). The 22 best AI education tools (students & teachers) in 2024. Tilburg University. Retriveved from https://tilburg.ai/2024/01/best-ai-education-tools/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Buripakdi, A., & An, L.T. (2024). “Why can’t I use ChatGPT for my academic learning?” Voices from Ph.D. students in a Thai university. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 299–319.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43), 1-18.
Cohen, K. (2024). Best AI tools for students. IU International University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.iu.org/blog/ai-and-education/best-ai-tools-for-students/
Djokic, I., Milićević, N., Djokic, N., Malcic, B., & Kalas, B. (2024). Students’ perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in educational services. Amfiteatru Economic, 26(65), 294-310.
Fakhar, H., Lamrabet, M., Echantoufi, N., El Khattabi, K., & Ajana, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence from teachers’ perspectives and understanding: Moroccan study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(6), 856-864.
Fissore, C., Floris, F., Fradiante, V., Marchisio Conte, M., & Sacchet, M. (2024). From theory to training: Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2024) (Vol. 2, pp. 118-127). SCITEPRESS.
Gibson, D., Kovanovic, V., Ifenthaler, D., Dexter, S., & Feng, S. (2023). Learning theories for artificial intelligence promoting learning processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1125-1146.
Gillett, A. (2024). Features of academic writing. UEFAP. Retrieved from https://www.uefap.com/index.htm
Harunasari, S. Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of an AI-integrated approach in EFL writing: A case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 39(2), 357-368.
Hidayat, M. T. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-based personalised reading platforms in enhancing reading comprehension. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 115-125.
Huang, F., & Zou, B. (2024). English speaking with artificial intelligence (AI): The roles of enjoyment, willingness to communicate with AI, and innovativeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108355.
Iamla-ong, H. (2014). Language learning problems and language learning strategies of MFU students. Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 54-86.
Imthap, P. C., Nueangdad, T., Dvngna, P., & runsuwannadit, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Active
learning teaching with morality of teachers in Thai educational institutions. MCU
Haripunchai Review, 8(1), 301-312.
Iwata, Y., Yokoyama, T., & Umemura, Y. (2020). An AI-based writing feedback system for improving reading comprehension skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1739-1759.
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(2), 1-21.
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-asisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265-1300.
Liu, Y., Zou, W., & Wang, Y. (2020). An AI-based personalised reading platform for Chinese primary school students. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(1), 1-16.
Methaneethorn, J. (2024). Generative AI in education: ChatGPT and Gemini as an educational tool. Journal of Information Technology and Innovation, 23(1), 85-99. [InThai]
Noviyanti, S. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI)-Based pronunciation checker: An alternative for independent learning in pandemic situation. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 5(2), 162-169.
Pakdee, S., & Phetmalhkul, T. (2024). Guidelines for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in education under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2. Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 4(6), 123-135. [InThai]
Pawapatcharaudom, R. (2007). An Investigation of Thai Students’ English Language Problems and Their Learning Strategies in the International Program at Mahidol University [Masters’ thesis, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology]. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology. [InThai]
Pongsukvajchakul, P. (2023). Analysis of Thai EFL university students’ needs in learning English paragraph writing. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 44-59. [InThai]
Sakkampang, D., & Mansourmahani, S. (2023). The Effects of the use AI chatbot on communicative writing skill and self-regulated learning strategies of Thai university students. Journal of Man and Society, 9(2), 119-138. [InThai]
Sanderson, I. J., & Stephens, O. S. (2023). The frequency and accuracy of prompts and suggestions made by Free Grammarly on Thai university students’ English writing errors. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 24(3), 257-294. [InThai]
Santhuenkaew, T. (2024). Using artificial intelligence technology (AI, ChatGPT) to promote writing skills. Journal of Applied Education, 2(2), 45-58. [InThai]
Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022, February). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. In 67th TEFLIN international virtual conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021) (Vol. 624, pp. 52-57). Atlantis Press.
Suryana, I., Asrianto, & Murwantono, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence to master English listening skills for non-English major students. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(1), 48-59.
Tantivejakul, N., Chantharasombat, J., & Kongpolphrom, W. (2024). Voices of the Future: Exploring Students’ Views on the Use of GenAI in Academic and Professional PR Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 511-537.
Techsauce. (2024, January 26). Top 10 popular AIs: ChatGPT takes first place with over 60% share. Retriveved from https://techsauce.co/tech-and-biz/the-most-popular-ai-tools
Thairath Online. (2023, December 26). Top 10 most effective AI technologies popular among people in 2023. Retrieved from https://www.thairath.co.th/lifestyle/tech/2750626 [InThai]
Thangthong, P., Phiromsombut, J., & Imsa-ard, P. (2024). Navigating AI writing assistance tools: Unveiling the insights of Thai EFL learners. THAITESOL Journal, 37(1), 111-131. [InThai]
The Nation. (2024, July 24). Majority of Thai people use AI in their daily lives for its convnience: Study. Retrieved from https://www.nationthailand.com/business/tech/40039969
Yang, Y.-F., Tseng, C., & Lai, S.-C. (2024). Enhancing teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in AI-based technology integration into English speaking teaching through a professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144(4), 104582.
Yu, C., Wu, L., Li, J., & Li, S. (2023). English listening teaching mode under artificial intelligence speech synthesis technology. ACM Transactions on Asian Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 22(1), 1-17