Structural Equation Modelling Forward to Research novation on Business Administration
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aims (1) to guidelines of using structural equation meta analysis to show the results of the study process. And (2) to summarize the steps to be used in social science for business administration research. Explain the important functions of structural equation metaphysics analysis from the research on documentary research methodology and propose a way to develop the use of statistical values to explain the analysis results. Starting from the process of comparing and collecting data from different research papers, the key steps in the application of Meta-analytic structural equation model. The aim is to determine what is found in common. The differences and relationships that emerge from research studies are defined as research in the field of social sciences and use data collection tools by processing evidence from data sources and related research from documentary research. Set the time range, show the independent variable studied significant performs a causal influence analysis. Findings are as follows: To summarize the results of the research study on the following
topics: (1) The magnitude of the influence that affects the variables as studied. Displays the
influence size and values. (2) The primary variables in this synthesis are variables expressed as
correlations and levels of correlation, indicating the measures that show the greatest correlation
coefficient and the knowledge from the analysis. (3) The relationship between the primary
variable and the variable of interest. Explaining the results of the study, it was found or not
that there was both direct and co-influence according to the level of statistical significance.
(4) Direct and indirect influence of primary variables to dependent variables by testing the
consistency between the theoretical model created by the researcher by causal influence analysis.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Allen, M. (2020). Understanding the practice, application, and limitations of meta-analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(1), 74-96.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173.
Aytug, Z. G., Rothstein, H. R., Zhou, W., & Kern, M. C. (2012). Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 103-133.
Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 197-214.
Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
Berry, C. M., Lelchook, A. M., & Clark, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the interrelationships between employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover: Implications for models of withdrawal behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 678-699.
Brown, S. D., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telander, K., Fan, X., & Lent, R. W. (2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students’ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 298-308.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
Burke, M. J., & Landis, R. S. (2013). Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. In Validity Generalization (pp. 287-309). Psychology Press.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2008). A model for integrating fixed- random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling. Psychological methods, 13(3), 182-202.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2021). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001 /acrefore-9780190224851-e-225
Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. sychological methods, 10(1), 40-64.
Combs, J. G., Ketchen, Jr, D. J., Crook, T. R., & Roth, P. L. (2011). Assessing cumulative evidence within ‘macro’research: Why meta-analysis should be preferred over vote counting. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 178-197.
Crook, T. R., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Combs, J. G., & Todd, S. Y. (2008). Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic management journal, 29(11), 1141-1154.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Sage.
Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: A meta-analytic path analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 865-897.
Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 463-483.
Erez, A., Bloom, M. C., & Wells, M. T. (1996). Using random rather than fixed effects models in meta-analysis: Implications for situational specificity and validity generalization. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 275-306.
Fan, H., Jackson, T., Yang, X., Tang, W., & Zhang, J. (2010). The factor structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test V 2.0 (MSCEIT): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7), 781-785.
Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 227-254.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 519-543.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Sage.
Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models. John Wiley & Sons.
Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J. R., Plewis, I., Draper, D., Browne, W. J., Yang, M., ... & Healy, M. (1998). A user’s guide to MLwiN, Version 1.0. Institute of Education.
Graham, J. M. (2011). Measuring love in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(6), 748-771.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hair, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Erlbaum.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage
Johnson, J. W., Carter, G. W., Davison, H. K., & Oliver, D. H. (2001). A synthetic validity approach to testing differential prediction hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 774-780.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765-780.
Kepes, S., McDaniel, M. A., Brannick, M. T., & Banks, G. C. (2013). Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the meta analytic reporting standards). Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 123-143.
Landis, R. S. (2013). Successfully combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling: Recommendations and strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 251-261.
Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis (Vol. 4). Glenview, Scott, Foresman.
Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological methods & research, 22(3), 376-398.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus [computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.
Roesch, S. C., & Weiner, B. (2001). A meta-analytic review of coping with illness: Do causal attributions matter?. Journal of psychosomatic research, 50(4), 205-219.
Robbins, S. B., Oh, I. S., Le, H., & Button, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1163-1184.
Saris W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications?. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 561-582.
Saris, W. E, Revilla, M., Krosnick, J., & Schaefer, E. M. (2010). Comparing questions with agree/disagree response options to questions with item specific response options. Survey Research Methods, 4(1), 561-582.
Saris, W. E., & Stronkhorst, L. H. (1984). Causal modelling in nonexperimental research: An introduction to the LISREL approach. Sociometric Research Foundation.
Saris, W., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 105-129.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in researching findings (3rd ed.). Sage.
Shadish, W. R. (1996). Meta-analysis and the exploration of causal mediating processes: A primer of examples, methods, and issues. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 47-65.
Shadish, W. R., Cook. T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.
Tokunaga, R. S., & Rains, S. A. (2010). An evaluation of two characterizations of the relationships between problematic Internet use, time spent using the Internet, and psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 512-545.
Van Den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Multilevel meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional meta-analytical procedures. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(5), 765-790.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865-885.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2009). The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic management journal, 30(6), 679-692.
