“Innovative Seedling” Needs Assessment for Curriculum Improvement at Yala Rajabhat University Demonstration School: Driving Towards Excellence with the "Innovative Seedling" Concept

Main Article Content

Karantharak Vitaya-apibalkul
wara thepnarong
Janjalee Tanomlikhitwong
Fraydau Sulaiman
Matnuree Noh
Wanmariam Chedamae

Abstract

DOI :10.14456/pnuhuso.2025.23   


      This article presents the results of a needs assessment analysis for curriculum development at Yala Rajabhat University Demonstration School. The objectives were to analyze the essential needs for curriculum improvement, to develop the school concept and learner identity, and to propose curriculum improvement approaches that align with the school's focus. The study employed mixed-methods research using needs assessment techniques through Priority Needs Index (PNI) analysis combined with qualitative data analysis. The instruments were validated for content validity by three experts and demonstrated high reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.85. The findings revealed that learning management had the highest level of necessity, followed by measurement and evaluation, and curriculum structure. The top five priority needs were: alignment of courses with learner needs, development of analytical thinking skills, technology integration in teaching and learning, modernization of course content, and experiential learning. These findings led to the development of a School Concept called "Innovative Seedling," which aims to nurture intellectual seedlings and develop them into multicultural innovators in the southern border provinces. Additionally, the study established a student identity (Identity) characterized as "Multicultural Young Innovator." This article proposes curriculum improvement approaches that respond to these identified needs, with the goal of enhancing educational quality at Yala Rajabhat University Demonstration School.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vitaya-apibalkul, K. ., thepnarong, wara, Tanomlikhitwong, J. ., Sulaiman, F. ., Noh, M. ., & Chedamae, W. . (2025). “Innovative Seedling” Needs Assessment for Curriculum Improvement at Yala Rajabhat University Demonstration School: Driving Towards Excellence with the "Innovative Seedling" Concept. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 148–166. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pnuhuso/article/view/280059
Section
Research Article

References

โรงเรียนสาธิตมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏยะลา. (2567). รายงานการวิเคราะห์สถานภาพของสถานศึกษา ประจำปีการศึกษา 2567. ผู้แต่ง.

โรงเรียนสาธิตมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏยะลา. (2568). แผนปฏิบัติราชการ ประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2568. ผู้แต่ง.

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2555). วิถีสร้างการเรียนรู้เพื่อศิษย์ในศตวรรษที่ 21. มูลนิธิสดศรี-สฤษดิ์วงศ์.

สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2558). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Banks, J. A. (2020). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (10th ed.). Wiley.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Oliva, P. F., & Gordon, W. R. (2013). Developing the curriculum (8th ed.). Pearson.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. http://www.p21.org/ storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf

Sleeter, C. E. (2018). Multicultural education past, present, and future: Struggles for dialog and power-sharing. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 20(1), 5-20.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.

Watson, K. (2019). School identity in the context of cultural diversity: Exploring the relationship between school culture and student outcomes. Educational Review, 71(5), 622-640.

Watkins, R., Meiers, M. W., & Visser, Y. L. (2012). A guide to assessing needs: Essential tools for collecting information, making decisions, and achieving development results. World Bank Publications.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.