Integrating Biomimicry in Pre-service Biology Teacher Education: Impacts on Design Thinking Competencies -
Main Article Content
Abstract
The innovation-creation process through mimicking problem-solving in nature has been applied as a context for learning design thinking competencies in a biology course. This research aimed to study the effectiveness of applying biomimicry to enhance pre-service teachers’ design thinking competencies across two dimensions: 1) knowledge and understanding of the design thinking concept, and 2) design thinking process skills. The target group comprised 24 pre-service biology teachers who were selected by purposive sampling. The research instruments were design thinking concept test, fieldnote, experiment worksheet and workpiece. The data were collected, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and deductive analysis methods.
The findings indicated that the majority of pre-service teachers possessed a high level of understanding regarding core design thinking competencies, encompassing its definitions, the iterative process, and the application of biomimicry principles for problem-solving. Nonetheless, misconceptions persisted regarding the prototyping and testing phases. Regarding the design thinking process skills, the results showed that while all pre-service teachers excelled in the initial phases—empathizing, defining, and ideating—only a small number successfully transitioned to the prototyping and testing stages. These findings provide valuable insights into the challenges faced by student teachers and can be used to inform the sequence of experiences or activities to better enhance their design thinking competencies.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abu-Faraj, O. Z. (2025). Integrating Biomimetics in Biomedical Engineering Education: Bridging Physiology and Pedagogy. LinkedIn Pulse. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/integrating-biomimetics-biomedical-engineering-abu-faraj-nri3f
Biomimicry Institute. (2021). What is biomimicry?. The Biomimicry Institute. https://biomimicry.org/what-is-biomimicry/
Coban, M., & Coştu, B. (2021). Integration of biomimicry into science education: biomimicry teaching approach. Journal of Biological Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/002 19266.2021.1877783
Chen, G., Ratana-ubol, A., Sonchaeng, P., Sumritdee, C., & Paonariang, M. (2022). Policy perspectives of challenges and factors in promoting science literacy in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(1), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2 022.43.1.33
Ilieva, L., Ursano, I., Traista, L., Hoffmann, B., & Dahy, H. (2022). Biomimicry as a Sustainable Design Methodology—Introducing the ‘Biomimicry for Sustainability’ Framework. Biomimetics, 7(37), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020037
Jituafua, A. (2024). A Professional Development Programme Based on Biomimicry to improve STEM Project Creativity of Science Student Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(4), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.038
Kennedy, B., Buikema, A., & Nagel, J. K. S. (2015). Integrating biology, design, and engineering for sustainable innovation. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, Princeton, 88-93. https://doi:10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119952
Lakanukan, S., Pongsophon, P., Faikhamta, C., & Jantarakantee, E. (2021). Competencies of Science Teachers for Teaching Design Thinking. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 24(2), 370-380. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/ view/246374.
Linder, B., & Huang, J. (2022). Beyond Structure-Function: Getting at Sustainability within Biomimicry Pedagogy. Biomimetics, 90(7), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7030090
McLaughlin, J. E., Lake, D., Chen, E., Guo, W., Knock, M., & Knotek, S. (2023). Faculty experiences and motivations in design thinking teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 1(8), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1172814
Marques de Sa, A. A., & Viana, D. M. (2023). Design and Biomimicry: A Review of Interconnection and Creative Potentials. Biomimetics, 61(8), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3 390/biomimetics8010061
Mohamed Elbaz, M. (2024). Biomimicry in Science Classrooms: Learning Design Thinking Skills Inspired by Nature “An Approach Teaching Models”. ARID International Journal of Educational and Phycological Sciences, 10(5), 97-141. https://doi.org/10.36772/arid. aijeps.2024.5105
Nagel, J., & Pidaparti, R. (2024). Fostering Innovation through Bio-inspired Projects in Engineering Design Education. International National Design Conference, 2935-2942. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.297
Thailand’s Ministry of Education. (2017). Learning strands and indicators for mathematics, science, and geography (social studies) (revised 2017) of core curriculum for basics education (2008). The Agricultural Cooperative Society of Thailand Press. https:// academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1559878841_d_1.pdf
Tom, M. (2021 November 2-6). The Failures of Prototyping: A Call for a New Definition. Proceeding of Relating System Thinking and Design (RSD10) 2021 Symposium. Faculty of Design, The Netherlands: OCAD.
Vasinayanuwatana, T., & Plianram, S. (2023). Biomimicry in STEM Education: Case Study of Developing Pre-service Biology Teachers' Integrative Teaching Competence. Research in Integrated STEM Education, 1, 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1163/27726673-BJA00011
Vasinayanuwatana, T., & Vanichanon, A. (2022). Biomimicry: An Alternative Way of STEM Education in Biology. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 33(1), 1-11. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edupsu/article/view/251787
Yuksel, K. O. (2025). Design‑Based STEM Activities in Teacher Education and Its Effect on Pre‑service Science Teachers’ Design Thinking Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34, 904–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10215-2
Zhu, L., Sun, D., Luo, M., Liu, W., & Xue, S. (2024). Investigating Pre‑Service Science Teachers’ Design Performance in Laboratory Class: The Inquiry‑Based Design Thinking Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10057-w