Is Language Awareness Supported by Grammar Lessons, Indirect and Metalinguistic Feedback? An Examination of Graduate Students’ Writing Across Drafts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the support for developing graduate students’ language awareness in academic writing drafts through the provision of grammar lessons and feedback – indirect and metalinguistic. The study was conducted in a basic academic writing module, offered to both masters’ and PhD students (n=48) at a university in Singapore. To gauge whether language awareness was supported, students completed three surveys and the researcher analyzed errors and their subsequent revisions in students’ written drafts. The survey results showed students’ positive perception towards grammar lessons and feedback, in terms of their usefulness and valuable impact on writing skills. Nonetheless, when students’ written drafts were examined, it was noted that the impact of feedback was largely centered on the revision of grammar within drafts of the same task, instead of other higher order writing skills or in a new writing task. To ensure that IF and MF are effective in supporting language awareness, it is recommended that students be socialized with feedback practices of an instructor, and to be cognizant of their study setting. Moreover, writing instructors should configure learning objectives to reflect the developing nature of academic literacy.
Article Details
References
Ali, N., Rose, S., & Ahmed, L. (2015). Psychology students’ perception of and engagement with feedback as a function of year of study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 574-586.
Aydin, S. (2010). EFL writers’ perceptions towards portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15, 194-203.
Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2018). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 1-25.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a f ocused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-211.
Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46,
Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Bacon-Shone, J. (2017). English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: Policy, realities and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 913-930.
Burner, T. (2014). The potential formative benefits of portfolio assessment in second and foreign language writing contexts: A review of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 139-149.
Cargan, L. 2007. Doing Social Research. Baltimore, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Chong, S. W. (2017). A three-stage model for implementing focused written corrective feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 34(2), 71-82.
Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: Implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330-347.
Chrabaszcz, A., & Jiang, N. (2014). The role of the native language in the use of the English nongeneric definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research, 30(3), 351-379.
Collet, V. S., & Greiner, A. C. (2020). Revisioning Grammar Instruction through Collaborative Lesson Study: A New Apprenticeship of Observation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 1-26.
Dearden, J. (2018). The changing role s of EMI academics and English language specialists. In Y. K ırkgöz & K. Dikilitaş (Eds.), Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 323-338). Springer.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.
Ferris, D., Eckstein, G., & DeHond, G. (2017). Self-directed language development: A study of first-year college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(4), 418.
Flowerdew, L. (2016). A genre-inspired and lexico-grammatical approach for helping postgraduate students craft research grant proposals. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 1-12.
Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24-34.
Gao, F. (2011). Exploring the reconstruction of Chinese learners’ national identities in their English- language-learning journeys in Britain. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(5), 287-305.
Gao, X. (2016). A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of linking adverbials in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 14-28.
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44.
He, J. J., & Chiang, S. Y. (2017). Challenges to English-medium instruction (EMI) for international students in China: A learners’ perspective: English-medium education aims to accommodate international students into Chinese universities, but how well is it working? English Today, 32(4), 63-67.
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107-119.
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A metaanalysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1-18.
Kim, K. M. (2018). Academic socialization of doctoral students through feedback networks: a qualitative understanding of the graduate feedback landscape. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 963-980.
Lam, R. (2013). Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback. Assessing Writing, 18, 132-153.
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524-536.
Lehtonen, T. (2018). Practitioner re search as a way of unde rstanding my work: Making sense of graduate s’ language use. In Y. K ırkgöz & K. Dikilitaş (Eds.) Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 129-140). Springer.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). “I really need feedback to learn:” Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(4), 347.
Liu, D., & Gleason, J., L. (2002). Acquisition of the article THE by nonnative speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 1-26.
Luo, N., & Hyland, K. (2017). Intervention and revision: Expertise and interaction in text mediation. Written Communication, 34(4), 414-440.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97-100.
Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 1-13.
Mujtaba, S. M., Parkash, R., & Nawaz, M. W. (2020). Do indirect coded corrective feedback and teachers short affective comments improve the writing pe rformance and le arners’ uptake? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(1), 34-47.
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017). Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 266-288.
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral
research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31.
Ng, L. L., & Ishak, S. N. A. (2018). Instructor’s Direct and Indirect Feedback: How do they Impact Learners’ Written
Performance? 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 24(3).
Nicolás–Conesa, F, Manchón, R. M., & Cerezo, L. (2019). The effect of unfocused direct and indirect written corrective feedback on rewritten texts and new texts: Looking into feedback for accuracy and feedback for acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 848-873.
Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 572-590.
Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311-320.
Romova, Z., & Andrew, M. (2011). Teaching and assessing academic writing via the portfolio: Benefits for learners of English as an additional language. Assessing Writing, 16, 111-122.
Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.
Shin, Y. K., Cortes, V., & Yoo, I. W. (2018). Using lexical bundles as a tool to analyze definite article use in L2 academic writing: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 29-41.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286-306.
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103-131.
Simard, D., Guénette, D., & Bergeron, A. (2015). L2 learners’ interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language Awareness, 24(3), 233-254.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.
Willey, I., & Tanimoto, K. (2015). “We’re drifting into strange territory here”: What think-aloud protocols reveal about convenience editing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 63-83.
Wu, S., Quentin Dixon, L., Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2019). Breadth or depth: the role of vocabulary in Chinese English-Language beginning writers’ development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1-17.