A Q Study of Mainland Chinese English Language Learners’ Epistemic Beliefs
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explored epistemic beliefs held by Mainland Chinese learners of English. Studies that investigate language learners’ personal epistemologies, which include beliefs about the nature of knowledge and the process of knowing, are scarce. For the most part, such studies are quantitative. This paper employed Q methodology, an approach that blends quantitative and qualitative research paradigms, to present a more systematic analysis of and deeper insights into the language learners’ subjective opinions. The participants were 20 undergraduate students who learned English in a university in China. They sorted 42 statements pertaining to language-related epistemic beliefs on a grid ranging from -5 (most disagree) to +5 (most agree). During the factor analytic procedure similar Q-sorts formed three factors, each representing a unique set of epistemic beliefs shared by the students. The qualitative interpretation of these factors revealed the following viewpoints: firstly, learning the English language requires time, effort and perseverance; secondly, learning English requires critical thinking; thirdly, it requires talent and hard work. Pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Apairach, S., & Vibulphol, J. (2015). Beliefs about language learning of Thai upper secondary school students in different educational contexts. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 50, 65-94.
Alkhateeb, H., & Alshaboul, Y. (2022). Teachers’ understanding of the importance of students’ mother tongue(s) in Qatar’s international English-medium primary schools: Findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(1), 37-56.
Banasick, S. (2019). KADE: A desktop application for Q methodology. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(36), 1360. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360
Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong/Australian Council for Educational Research.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.
Caruso, M., & Fraschini, N. (2021). A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students: An Australian perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12713
Chan, C. K. K., & Rao, N. (2009). Introduction. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts (pp. 3–32). Springer.
Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 392-414. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1102
Chomsky, N. (1975). Knowledge of language. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge (pp. 299–320). University of Minnesota Press.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2013). Introduction: Researching cultures of learning. In M. Cortazzi & L. Jin (Eds.), Researching cultures of learning: International perspectives on language learning and education (pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan.
Damio, S. M., & Hashim, H. (2014). Conceptions of autonomy in language learning from a cultural perspectives using Q methodology. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v2i1.27
Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner Book Company.
Fong, E. T. Y. (2021). English in China: Language, identity and culture. London: Routledge.
Gyenes, A. (2021). Student perceptions of critical thinking in EMI programs at Japanese universities: A Q methodology study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101053
Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, M. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599–615.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
Hofer, B. K. (2006). Domain specificity of personal epistemology: Resolved questions, persistent issues, new models. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 85–95.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333–340.
Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283–294.
Irie, K., Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching competences. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 575–598. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/9444
Jehng, J. C. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1004
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5–20.
Kahsay, M. T. (2019). EFL students’ epistemological beliefs and use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in Bahir Dar University. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 7(26), 69–83. Retrieved from http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_625692_feb95289b803bbd11b87451dd5e7fd6a.pdf
Kruk, M., Pawlak, M., Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2022). Potential sources of foreign language learning boredom: A Q methodology study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.3
Lan, G., Nikitina, L., & Woo, W. S. (2021). Ideal L2 self and willingness to communicate: A moderated mediation model of shyness and grit. System, 99, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102503
Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319.
Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner (pp. 25–41). Comparative Education Research Centre.
Li, E. (2017). The “Chinese learner”: A historical and cultural biography. SFU Educational Review, 10(1), 1–13.
Li, J. (2001). Chinese conceptualization of learning. Ethos, 29, 111–137.
Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese “heart and mind for wanting to learn.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 248–269.
Li, J., & Fischer, K. W. (2004). Thought and affect in American and Chinese learners’ beliefs about learning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 385–418). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Li, Y., Nikitina, L., & Riget, P. N. (2022). Development of syntactic complexity in Chinese university students’ L2 argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101099.
Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism: Findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(3), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1495373.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Kun, T. L. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner (pp. 69–83). Comparative Education Research Centre.
McKeown, B. F., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning?. Language Learning, 49(3), 377–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00094
Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2006). Re-examining Horwitz’s beliefs about language learning inventory (BALLI) in the Malaysian context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 209-219.
Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2018). Dimensionality in language learners’ personal epistemologies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 269–282. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1165215.pdf
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pritchard, D. (2006). What is this thing called knowledge? Routledge.
Rock, J. (2013). Exploring vocabulary-related epistemological beliefs with Q methodology. L’analisi Linquistica ELetteraria, 21(2), 137–154. Retrieved from https://www.analisilinguisticaeletteraria.eu/index.php/ojs/article/view/282
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01311.x
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–275). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Slaughter, Y., Bonar, G., & Keary, A. (2022). The role of membership viewpoints in shaping language teacher associations: A Q methodology analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3068
Stephenson, W. (1935a). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136(3434), 297.
Stephenson, W. (1935b). Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality, 4, 17–24.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1993). Introduction to Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 17(1/2), 1–13.
Tang, M., & Tian, J. (2015). Associations between Chinese EFL graduate students’ beliefs and language learning strategies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 131-152.
Wang, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Traditional Chinese views on education as perceived by international students in China: International student attitudes and understandings. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(2), 195–216.
Wang, Y., Nikitina, L., Kaur, J., & Furuoka, F. (2022). Developing and piloting a Q-sample on Chinese language learners’ epistemic beliefs. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 119-132.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911
Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 231–260). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Yang, S. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Taiwanese Chinese people’s conceptions of intelligence. Intelligence, 25(1), 21–29.