A Systematic Literature Review: Direct and Indirect Feedback Strategies in EFL Contexts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
To date, there has been mounting research evidence on the impact of written corrective feedback. In response to this, reviews have been conducted to condense either findings or methodologies through the combined analysis of EFL and ESL studies. Although syntheses shed light on the topic, no one provides exclusive insights into EFL realities. Therefore, this systematic literature review was proposed to synthesize methodologies, findings, and research suggestions of EFL articles analyzing direct and indirect feedback, two widely debated and employed strategies in classrooms, with either a focused or unfocused scope. Through a seven-step protocol suggested by Petticrew and Roberts (2006), 21 EFL primary studies published between 2012 and 2022 were selected from the bibliometric dataset of Crosthwaite et al. (2022), which contains articles retrieved from the Scopus database. The papers were read through to answer five research questions on methodologies, findings, and study suggestions. The results show that most EFL studies were quasi-experimental adopting a quantitative approach with a pretest-posttest-delayed-posttest or pretest-posttest design, and the strategies significantly impinged on grammar and non-grammar aspects. Suggestions are given to further study the impact of feedback under different conditions such as targets, proficiency levels, and strategies and scope with a comparative nature.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Afruzi, S. M., Vaez-Dalili, M., & Hadian, B. (2022). Investigating the effects of written corrective feedback and revision on EFL learners’ production of grammatical structures. Education and Self Development, 17(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.1.06
Aghajanloo, K., Mobini, F., & Khosravi, R. (2016). The effect of teachers’ written corrective feedback (WCF) types on intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.28
Akmal, M. (2019). Direct-unfocused-corrective feedback: A model for improving writing skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(11), 206-220.
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Bagheri, M., & Rassaei, E. (2022). The effects of two forms of written corrective feedback and ambiguity tolerance on EFL learners’ writing accuracy. English Teaching & Learning, 46(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00082-6
Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735
Bitchener, J. (2012). Written corrective feedback for L2 development: Current knowledge and future research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.62
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing (1st ed.). Routledge.
Bozorgian, H., & Yazdani, A. (2021). Direct written corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanation: Investigating language analytic ability. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.120976
Budianto, S., Sulistyo, T., Widiastuti, O., Heriyawati, D. F., & Marhaban, S. (2020). Written corrective feedback across different levels of EFL students’ academic writing proficiency: Outcomes and implications. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 472-485. https://doi.org./10.24815/siele.v7i2.16569
Cárcamo, B. (2020). Classifying written corrective feedback for research and educational purposes: A typology proposal. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.79924
Chong, S. W. (2019). A Systematic review of written corrective feedback research in ESL/EFL contexts. Language Education & Assessment, 2(2), 70-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.29140/lea.v2n2.138
Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.
Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S., & Lee, I. (2022). Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 WCF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934
Dörnyei, Z., & Dewaele, J. (2023). Questionnaires in second language research construction, administration, and processing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781003331926
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Esfandiar, F., Yaqubi, B., & Marzban, A. (2014). Learning corrected target forms: Students’ corrective feedback through teacher’s written corrective feedback in Iranian EFL context. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(3), 504-512. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.3.504-512
Esmaeeli, M., & Sadeghi, K. (2020). The effect of direct versus indirect focused written corrective feedback on developing EFL learners’ written and oral skills. Language Related Research, 11(5), 124-89. https://doi.org/10.21859/LRR.11.5.124
Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). The University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446-459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000250
Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019). Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective? Language Awareness, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742
Ghoorchaei, B., Mamashloo, F., Ayatollahi, M. A., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2022). Effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL writers’ short and long term retention of subject-verb agreement. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2014022
Han, Y. (2012). The intra-and inter-task effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback. Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(2), 71-96.
Hashemnezhad, H., & Mohammadnejad, S. (2012). A case for direct and indirect feedback: The other side of coin. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p230
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4
Jabulani, S. (2015). Efficacy of written corrective feedback on university students’ writing. Journal of Social Sciences, 45(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2015.11893490
Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The effect of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). John Benjamins.
Khaki, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2021). Assessing the effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback in process-based vs product-based instruction on learners’ writing. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, 35-53. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.21.03
Khodadadi, S. (2021). The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ grammatical accuracy in sentence completion exercises. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 315-326.
Lee, I. (2012). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000390
Lee, I. (2019). School-based innovations in written corrective feedback: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Language and Literacy Education.
Lee, I., Luo, N., & Mak, P. (2021). Teachers’ attempts at focused written corrective feedback in situ. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100809. https://doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
Mirzaii, M., & Aliabadi, R. B. (2013). Direct and indirect written corrective feedback in the context of genre-based instruction on job application letter writing. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.02.2
Mohammadreza, V. (2022). The effect of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ written syntactic complexity. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12052
Mohebbi, H. (2021). 25 years on, the written error correction debate continues: An interview with John Truscott.
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi:10.1186/s40862-021-00110-9
Mujtaba, S. M., Parkash, R., & Nawaz, M. W. (2020). Do indirect coded corrective feedback and teachers short affective comments improve the writing performance and learners uptake? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1616638
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., & Mohebbi, H. (2019). Assessing the effect of focused direct and focused indirect written corrective feedback on explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners. Language Testing in Asia, 9, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0084-9
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., Mohebbi, H., & Masjedlou, A. P. (2017). Speaking out on behalf of the voiceless learners: Written corrective feedback for English language learners in Iran. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 822-841. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.218781106549247
Nguyen, N. L. T., Nguyen, B. T. T., & Hoang, G. T. L. (2021). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback on EFL writing in a Vietnamese tertiary context. Language Related Research, 12(5), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.5.15
Nicolás–Conesa, F., Manchón, R., & Cerezo, L. (2019). The effect of unfocused direct and indirect written corrective feedback on rewritten texts and new texts: Looking into feedback for accuracy and feedback for acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12592
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586897
Rahimi, M. (2019). A comparative study of the impact of focused vs. comprehensive corrective feedback and revision on ESL learners’ writing accuracy and quality. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819879182
Reid, J. (2005). Ear learners and errors in US college writing. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. Eggington, W. Crabbe & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp. 117-128). Multilingual Matters.
Ruegg, R. (2015). Student uptake of teacher written feedback on writing. Asian EFL Journal, 17(1), 36-56.
Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2019). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 707-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164
Sato, M., & Storch, N. (2022). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 919-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582
Septiana, A. R., Sulistyo, G. H., & Kadarisman, A. E. (2016). Corrective feedback and writing accuracy of students across different levels of grammatical sensitivity. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i1.2642
Sherpa, S. Z. (2021). Effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on Bhutanese learners’ grammatical accuracy over time. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 574-603.
Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017
Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving grammatical accuracy in Thai learners’ writing: Comparing direct and indirect written corrective feedback. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 430-442. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.3.4.430
Tatsanajamsuk, P., & Saengboon, S. (2021). The roles of indirect asynchronous electronic feedback and direct corrective feedback in improving students’ L2 writing: A multiple case study of Thai undergraduate students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 397-426.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Üstünbaş, Ü., & Çimen, S. (2017). Digging out the debate: Types of corrective feedback and their effects on grammatical accuracy in writing. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 923-931.