Finite Complement Clauses in Disciplinary Research Articles Authored by Filipino Academic Writers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Finite complement clauses (FCCs) are an understudied syntactic structure of L2 advanced academic writing. The present study cross-investigated FCCs in qualitative (QUALI) and quantitative (QUANTI) research articles written by Filipino academic writers (FAWs) in Applied Linguistics (APPLING), Communication (COMM), and Measurement and Evaluation (MEEV). Specifically, it determined the FCCs with the most occurrences across five disciplinary research article sub-registers and identified whether these FCCs differ significantly in terms of frequencies of use. With Hernandez’s (2021) framework adapted from Biber and Gray’s (2016) study, this research analyzed five FCCs in 42 disciplinary research articles. Major results revealed that verb-controlled that-clauses (with 33.69 as normalized frequency count) outnumbered other FCCs in research article sub-registers across disciplines. They were more recurrent in QUALI and QUANTI APPLING research articles (7.91 and 7.54, respectively) and QUANTI and QUALI COMM research articles (7.34 and 6.96, respectively) than in QUANTI MEEV research articles (3.94). In addition, a significant difference exists between them and other FCCs at the p<.05 level in terms of frequencies of use. In view of these findings, it can be concluded that verb-controlled that-clauses are the most useful FCCs in APPLING, COMM, and MEEV research articles. Likewise, FAWs across the three disciplines write more informally as signposted by their repeated use of that complementizer with these FCCs controlled by verbs. The study draws its implications for academic writing instruction.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Anthony, L. (2021). AntConc (Version 3.5.9). https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Bautista, M. L. S. (2000). Defining standard Philippine English: Its status and grammatical features. De La Salle University Press.
Bautista, M. L. S. (2001). Attitudes of English language faculty in three leading universities towards Philippine English. Asian Englishes, 4(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2001.10801062
Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23
Biber D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Biber D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.10.1017/S1360674311000025
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776
Biber D., Gray, B., & Poonpoon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Biber D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Contrasting the grammatical complexities of conversation and academic writing: Implications for EAP writing development and teaching. LIF – Language in Focus Journal, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0001
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776
Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literature, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105–123). Cambridge University Press.
Collins, P., Yao, X., & Borlongan, A. M. (2014). Relative clauses in Philippine English: A diachronic perspective. In L. Vandelanotte, K. Davidse, C. Gentens & D. Kimps (Eds.), Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora (pp. 125–146). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211130_008
Commission on Higher Education. (2009). National higher education research agenda 2 (2009-2018) (NHERA 2). Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/NHERA-2.pdf
Crystal, D. (2008). “Two thousand million?”. English Today, 24(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078408000023
Dayag, D. T. (2012). Philippine English. In E. L. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy, and language in use (pp. 91–100). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42
Dayag, D. T. (2014). Preposition stranding and pied-piping in Philippine English: A corpus-based study. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim & H. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp. 102–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477186.008
Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D. (2020). Doing corpus linguistics with a corpus. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888790
Flowerdew, J. (2013). English for research publication purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 301–322). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855
Flowerdew, J., & Habibie, P. (2022). Introducing English for research publication purposes. Routledge.
Galloway, N. (2017). Global Englishes and change in English language teaching: Attitudes and impact. Routledge.
Gonzalez, A. (2005). Distinctive grammatical features of Philippine literature in English: Influencing or influenced? In D. T. Dayag & J. S. Quakenbush (Eds.), Linguistics and language education in the Philippines and beyond. A festschrift in honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista (pp. 15–26). Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71
Gustilo, L. E. (2010). “Although if is more frequent than whether...”: An analysis of the uses of adverbial clauses in Philippine English research articles. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 24–44.
Hassanzadeh, M., & Tamleh, H. (2023). The use of lexical bundles by native English authors in applied linguistics: A corpus–driven study. Language Related Research, 13(6), 541–569.
Hernandez, H. P. (2021). Syntactic description of research articles across disciplines [Doctoral dissertation]. Philippine Normal University–Manila.
Hernandez, H. P. (2022). How syntactically complex is L2 academic research writing by Filipino researchers across disciplines? Language Related Research, 13(5), 45–74. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23223081.1401.0.0.222.4
Hernandez, H. P., & Genuino, C. F. (2022). Compression and implicitness through dependent phrases in academic ESL writing by Filipino researchers across disciplines. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 546–577.
Hernandez, H. P. (2023). Finite adverbial clauses in L2 academic research writing: A cross-examination of disciplinary research articles authored by Filipino researchers. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.18065
Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). “We believe that...”: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk, H. G. Widdowson & Y. Cant`u (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press.
Kachru, B. B. (1997). English as an Asian languag e. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), English is an Asian language: The Philippine context (pp. 1–23). The Macquarie Library Pty., Ltd.
Kim, C., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100775
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2016). Academic writing for publication in a multilingual world. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 201–222). Walter de Gruyter Inc. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335
Lu, X., Casal, E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832
Mabayo, R. (2019, May 24). Considering history and narratives as Spain and the Philippines approach 500th anniversary: At the 500th anniversary of the arrival of Spain in the Philippines, which narrative do we celebrate? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/considering-history-and-narratives-as-spain-and-the-philippines-approach-500th-anniversary/
Mauranen, A., Llantada, C. P., & Swales, J. M. (2021). Academic Englishes: A standardised knowledge? In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The handbook of world Englishes (2nd ed.) (pp. 659–676). Routledge.
Menghini, M. (2017). Supporting multilingualism in academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 11(4), 107–130.
Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 347–366). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855
Rose, H., & Galloway, N. (2019). Global Englishes for language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678343
Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.001
Schneider, E. W. (2023). Philippine English in relation to American English. In A. M. Borlongan (Ed.), Philippine English: Development, structure, and sociology of English in the Philippines (pp. 143–155). Routledge.
Senate of the Philippines. (2013, January 21). Senate declares Chinese New Year as special working holiday [Press release]. http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2013/0121_prib1.asp
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
van Enk, A., & Power, K. (2017). What is a research article? Genre variability and data selection in genre research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.07.002
Wu, Z., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. Systems, 97, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427