An Analysis of Agency in Thai Education Policy: A Corpus- Driven Approach

Main Article Content

Natakorn Satienchayakorn
Pattamawan Jimarkon

Abstract

The most important skill in modern education is critical thinking and its necessary elements are agencies and voices which are force, ability, or power to make decisions or changes. Despite numerous efforts to increase Thai students’ critical thinking skills, their ability to construct social and academic arguments is still far too weak. In addition, while these efforts mainly focus on students’ critical thinking skills, little attention has been given to other education stakeholders such as education, institutions, schools, and teachers which potentially provide room for teachers and students to be critical. In this study, we investigated the ideological indexation of education stakeholders in a series of Thai educational policies (TEPs) years 2016-2018 from the Ministry of Education, Thailand. In TEPs, we utilized the corpus linguistic frequency function to locate the possible stakeholders and applied the framework of syntactic corpus analysis for agency identification (FO-SCAAI) to lexically elicit their agencies and voices which are important elements in modern education. The findings revealed an understanding of the representation of varying degrees of education stakeholders’ agencies in TEPs. The implications of this study will lead to the realization that education stakeholders lack agencies and voices. We hope that upon realizing their lack of agency, the involved parties will make changes by providing more agencies to education stakeholders through modern education in Thai education policies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Satienchayakorn, N., & Jimarkon, P. (2024). An Analysis of Agency in Thai Education Policy: A Corpus- Driven Approach. REFLections, 31(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i1.271945
Section
Research articles

References

Abid, R. Z., & Manan, S. A. (2015). Integrating corpus linguistics in critical literacy pedagogy: A case study of Lance Armstrong’s transformation from a titleholder to a fraud. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 128-137.

Akman, O. (2016). The importance of using archives in Social Studies Education. Research Highlights in Education and Science. https://www.isres.org/books/chapters/RHES2016-4_10-09-2017.pdf

Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188-221.

Amiraslani, F. (2021). Rising to the top ten transformative projects in Asia and the Pacific: A stakeholder analysis of the community-based carbon sequestration project in Eastern Iran. Project Leadership and Society, 2 (December 2021).

Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). The routledge international handbook of critical education. Taylor & Francis.

Aragbuwa, A. (2021). A discursive strategies and resistance ideologies in victims’ narratives in Stella Dimoko Korkus’ Domestic violence diary. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 10(1), 276-304.

Aşık, A. (2017). A sample corpus integration in language teacher education through coursebook evaluation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 728-740.

Auttawutikul, S., Wiwitkunkasem, K., & Smith, D. R. (2014). Use of weblogs to enhance group learning and design creativity amongst students at a Thai University. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 378-388.

Bakar, K. A. (2014). Attitude and identity categorizations: A corpus-based study of gender representation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 747-756.

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306.

Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. Routledge.

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.

Blanco-Fernández, Y., López-Nores, M., Pazos-Arias, J. J., Gil-Solla, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M., & García-Duque, J. (2014). REENACT: A step forward in immersive learning about human history by augmented reality, role playing, and social networking. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4811-4828.

Blázquez, L., García, J. A., & Bodoque, J. M. (2021). Stakeholder analysis: Mapping the river networks for integrated flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, 506-516.

Boa, E. A., Wattanatorn, A., & Tagong, K. (2018). The development and validation of the Blended Socratic Method of Teaching (BSMT): An instructional model to enhance critical thinking skills of undergraduate business students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 81-89.

Borer, T. A., Darby, J., & McEvoy-Levy, S. (2006). Peacebuilding after peace accords: The challenges of violence, truth, and youth. University of Notre Dame Press.

Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2020). #LancsBox v. 6.0. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox

Brindle, A. (2016). A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of the Sunflower Student Movement in the English-language Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society, 27(1), 3-19.

Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14(3), 237-273.

Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters.

Clark, U. (2005). Bernstein’s theory of pedagogic discourse: Linguistics, educational policy and practice in the UK English/literacy classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 32-47.

Challenor, J., & Ma, M. (2019). A review of augmented reality applications for history education and heritage visualization. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(39), 1-20.

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37-48.

Charoensuthipan, P. (2023). Pisa results panic scholars. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2699879

Despagne, C., & Manzano-Munguía, M. C. (2020). Youth return migration (US-Mexico): Students’ citizenship in Mexican schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 110.

Dredger, K. S., & Lehman, B. (2020). Dialogic multimodal paired presentations: Examining perspective. Virginia English Journal, 69(2), 8-17.

Dumteeb, N. (2009). Teachers’ questioning techniques and students’ critical thinking skills: English language classroom in the Thai context [Doctoral dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). SAGE Publications.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Formanowicz, M., Roessel, J., Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2017). Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: The social side of grammar. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(5), 566-579.

Franco-Trigo, L., Fernandez-Llimos, F., Martínez-Martínez, F., Benrimoj, S. I., & Sabater-Hernández, D. (2020). Stake holder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review. Health Policy, 124(10), 1083-1099.

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.

Gabriel, R., & Lester, J. N. (2013). Sentinels guarding the grail: Value-added measurement and the quest for education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(9), 1-26.

Gill, S., & Niens, U. (2014). Education as humanisation: A theoretical review on the role of dialogic pedagogy in peacebuilding education. Compare: A journal of comparative and international education, 44(1), 10-31.

Golz, R., Grauman, O., & Whybra, D. (2019). The humanization of education: Some major contemporary challenges for an innovative concept. International Dialogues on Education: Past and Present, 6(2), 30-42.

Halliday, M., Matthiessen, C. M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Hou, Z. (2015). A critical analysis of media reports on China’s air defense identification zone. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 194-201.

Keawsomnuk, P. (2017). Management of basic education for ethnic groups in highland and border regions of Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 97-104.

Kester, K. (2009). Education for peace: Content, form, and structure: Mobilizing youth for civic engagement. Peace & Conflict Review, 4(2), 1-9.

Kilderry, A. (2014). Teachers in early childhood policy. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 242-262.

Kinnear, L. C., & Ruggunan, S. (2019). Applying duoethnography to position researcher identity in management research. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 1-11.

Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Landi, D. (2019). Queer men, affect, and physical education. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(2), 168-187.

Lee, J. (2020). Analysis of referential cohesion in L2 written narratives within an English immersion education context. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(2), 493-507.

Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (2017). Exploring the intersection of education policy and discourse analysis: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(25), 1-13.

Ling, C., & Dale, A. (2014). Agency and social capital: Characteristics and dynamics. Community Development Journal, 49(1), 4-20.

Mala, D. (2019). Poor grades for Thai students in PISA tests. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1808509/poor-grades-for-thai-students-in-pisa-tests

Malik, S., & Tariq, F. (2021). Recasting paradigms of institutional analysis and stakeholder analysis in housing research. Journal of Urban Management, 10(4), 357-368.

Martin, J. (2016). The grammar of agency: Studying possibilities for student agency in science classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10(September 2016), 40-49.

Mayo, P. (2009). Competitiveness, diversification and the international higher education cash flow: The EU’s higher education discourse amidst the challenges of globalisation. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19(2), 87-103.

Mockler, N. (2020). Ten years of print media coverage of NAPLAN: A corpus-assisted assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(2), 117-144.

Ministry of Education. (2017, October 19). Ministry of Education, Thailand. http://www.en.moe.go.th/enMoe2017/index.php/policy-and-plan/education-policy

Miller, E. R., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System, 79, 49-59.

Nawarat, N. (2012). Thailand education policy for migrant children from Burma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 956-961.

Norton, L., & Sliep, Y. (2018). A critical reflexive model: Working with life stories in health promotion education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 45-63.

O’Neill, J. (2012). Rationality and rationalisation in teacher education policy discourse in New Zealand. Educational Research, 54(2), 225-237.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021, October 1). Education Policy Outlook Country Profiles. https://www.oecd.org/education/profiles.htm

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). The OECD and Southeast Asia. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/southeast-asia/countries/thailand/#:~:text=Thailand%20is%20an%20Associate%20and,in%20the%20International%20Energy%20Agency

Pelyukh, O., Lavnyy, V., Paletto, A., & Troxler, D. (2021). Stakeholder analysis in sustainable forest management: An application in the Yavoriv region (Ukraine). Forest Policy and Economics, 131, 1-9.

Pimthong, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(2), 289-295.

Pohlhaus Jr, G. (2020). Epistemic agency under oppression. Philosophical Papers, 49(2), 233-251.

Radu, B.-M. (2019). Education in a modern society. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 14(3), 24-36.

Rafiq, K., Bari, A., & Lakho, M. K. (2021). Portrayal of Aasia Bibi Blasphemy case: A comparative analysis of news headlines in Pakistani newspapers. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 4(3), 95-115.

Raum, S., Rawlings-Sanaei, F., & Potter, C. (2021). A web content-based method of stakeholder analysis: The case of forestry in the context of natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 300(December 2021).

Reinhard, K., & Pogrzeba, A. (2016). Comparative cooperative education: Evaluating Thai models on work-integrated learning, using the German duale hochschule baden-wuerttemberg model as a benchmark. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(3), 227-247.

Saada, N., & Gross, Z. (2017). Islamic education and the challenge of democratic citizenship: A critical perspective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(6), 807-822.

Salomon, G. (2011). Four major challenges facing peace education in regions of intractable conflict. Peace and Conflict, 17(1), 46-59.

Sanjakdar, F. (2018). Can difference make a difference? A critical theory discussion of religion in sexuality education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(3), 393-407.

Scardigno, R., Papapicco, C., Luccarelli, V., Zagaria, A. E., Mininni, G., & D’Errico, F. (2021). The humble charisma of a white-dressed man in a desert place: Pope Francis’ communicative style in the Covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-8.

Semin, G. R., & Marsman, J. G. (1994). Multiple inference-inviting properties of interpersonal verbs: Event instigation, dispositional inference, and implicit causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 836–849.

Semino, S., & Basuki, E. P. (2017). Framing peace: An ideological discourse analysis of Obama’s speech in Cairo. Education and Human Development Journal, 2(2). 63-76.

Sert, O., & Aşık, A. (2020). A corpus linguistic investigation into online peer feedback practices in CALL teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(1), 55-78.

Stapleton, C., & Davies, J. (2011). Imagination: The third reality to the virtuality continuum [Paper presentation]. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality-Arts, Media, and Humanities.

Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). A discourse analysis: Personal pronouns in Donald Trump’s inauguration speech. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices (pp. 41-79). Routledge.

Villares, R. (2019). The role of language policy documents in the internationalisation of multilingual higher education: An exploratory corpus-based study. Languages, 4(3), 56.

Von Solms, R., & Von Solms, B. (2004). From policies to culture. Computers & Security, 23(4), 275-279.

Wilson, K. (2008). Reclaiming ‘agency’, reasserting resistance. IDS Bulletin, 39(6), 83-91.

White, S. C. (2006). The gender lens: A racial blinder? Progress in Development Studies, 6(1), 55-67.