Blended Learning and its Impact on English Reading Comprehension among Thai Vocational Students

Main Article Content

Alvin Espiritu Bersamin
Mark Bedoya Ulla
Aree Saripa
Korawan Suebsom
Henry E. Lemana II

Abstract

This research aimed to assess the impact of blended learning on the English reading comprehension abilities of second-year Thai vocational students. It also examined how these students perceived their satisfaction regarding their blended learning experience using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Thirty students enrolled in a Thai vocational college in the southern part of Thailand during the second semester of the Academic Year 2022-2023 participated in the study. These students attended a six-week blended learning (BL) program in which they took a one-group pretest and posttest experimental design. The BL program comprised nine lesson plans, English reading comprehension tests, and online satisfaction items. Data analysis involved paired sample t-tests, mean, and standard deviations. The findings revealed that the posttest scores for English reading comprehension were significantly higher than the pretest scores at a significance level of 0.05. Furthermore, students reported a high mean score of 4.73 (very satisfied) with their blended learning experience after their improved English reading comprehension tests. Implications were discussed, and recommendations were also offered.

Article Details

How to Cite
Espiritu Bersamin, A., Bedoya Ulla, M., Saripa, A., Suebsom, K., & E. Lemana II, H. (2024). Blended Learning and its Impact on English Reading Comprehension among Thai Vocational Students. REFLections, 31(1), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i1.272396
Section
Research articles

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22.

Almasi, M., & Zhu, C. (2020). Investigating students’ perceptions of cognitive presence in relation to learner performance in blended learning courses: A mixed-methods approach. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(4), 324-336.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.

Bakeer, A. (2018). Students’ attitudes towards implementing blended learning in teaching English in higher education institutions: A case of Al-Quds Open University. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(6), 131-139.

Banditvilai, C. (2020). The effectiveness of reading strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 46-50. http://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.V10.1012

Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A blended learning model for learning achievement enhancement of Thai undergraduate students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48-55.

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850

Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w

Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., Saengmanee, S., & Rungkaew, T. (2022). Integration of technology during the covid-19 pandemic: Experience, challenges and needs of Thai EFL teachers. rEFLections, 29(2), 251–277.

Chanthap, N., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2019). The effect of integration of a blended learning and extensive reading instructional model on Thai EFL undergraduate students’ learner autonomy. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(2), 76-96.

Chen, R. H. (2022). Effects of deliberate practice on blended learning sustainability: A community of inquiry perspective. Sustainability, 14(3), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031785

Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N. I., Ju, B., & Tong, X. (2020). Using the community of inquiry framework to understand students’ learning experience in online undergraduate business courses. TechTrends, 64, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Wilton, D. (2018). Guide to blended learning. Commonwealth of Learning.

EF EPI (2023). Education First English Proficiency Index. https://www.ef.co.th/epi/regions/asia/thailand/

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522

Khamkhong, S. (2018). Developing English L2 critical reading and thinking skills through the Pisa reading literacy assessment framework: A case study of Thai EFL learners. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 83-94. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-07

Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1460

Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Learners’ perceptions of asynchronous social presence in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293

Moradimokhles, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). The effect of online vs. blended learning in developing English language skills by nursing student: An experimental study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1653-1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881

OECD Education GPS (2022, December 9). Thailand: Student performance (PISA 2022). https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=THA&treshold=10&topic=PI

Pimsarn, P. (2009). The effects of reading strategies instruction on graduate students’ reading comprehension. rEFLections, 12, 25–36.

Pinphet, P., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2022). The effects of project-based blended learning with communication strategy instruction on English oral communication ability of undergraduate engineering students. rEFLections, 29(1), 207–231.

Pongsatornpipat, W. (2021). Interactive group in extensive reading to enhance reading ability of Thai undergraduate students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 342-371.

Praditsorn, P., & Ulla, M. B. (2022). Supporting online language teaching: The use of Zoom and Facebook (zoom-booking). TESL-EJ, 26(2), 1-17.

Privitera, G. J. (2019). Quasi-experimental and single-case experimental designs. In Research methods for the behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.

Saeheng, P. (2017). A study of e-learning, blended learning, and traditional teaching methods motivates autonomous learning in English reading comprehension of Thais learners. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2(1), 1-20.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553.

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348

Sun, Z., & Yang, Y. (2023). The mediating role of learner empowerment in the relationship between the community of inquiry and online learning outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 58, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100911

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. Bonk, M. Le e & T. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 77-88). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ulla, M. B., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2022). Teaching presence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practices of EAP teachers in a Thai university. In Cases on teaching English for Academic Purposes (EAP) during COVID-19: Insights from around the world (pp. 28-51). IGI Global.

Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Facebook as an integrated online learning support application during the COVID-19 pandemic: Thai university students’ experiences and perspectives. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08317

Ulla, M. B., Perales, W. F., & Tarrayo, V. N. (2020). Integrating Internet-based applications in English language teaching: Teacher practices in a Thai university. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 365-378.

UNESCO World Bank (2021). Thailand: Learning poverty brief 2021 (English). Learning Poverty Brief Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/877101624613408454/Thailand-Learning-Poverty-Brief-2020

Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2021). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: Learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881

Watanapokakul, S. (2022). Blended online learning: Perceptions and experiences of EFL university students and teachers. rEFLections, 29(1), 60–87.

Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456-1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236

Yudhana, S. (2021). The implementation of blended learning to enhance English reading skills of Thai undergraduate students. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 1-7.

Zainuddin, Z. & Keumala, C.M. (2008). Blended learning method within Indonesian higher education institutions. Journal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(2), 69-77.

Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 38-53.

Zhang, Y., & Lin, H. (2021). Effects of community of inquiry, learning presence and mentor presence on K-12 online learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 782-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12523