Enhancing Science Vocabulary and Content Knowledge of Thai EFL students through Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English Science Textbooks Word Lists (ESTWL)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of subject-specific word lists to assist EFL learners is becoming popular, as is the utilization of CLIL to teach English in academic areas of science. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of the instruction of English Science Textbooks Word Lists (ESTWL) and the CLIL approach on the Science Vocabulary Knowledge and Science Content Knowledge of Thai EFL students. A mixed-methods research design was employed to gather both quantitative and qualitative data using ESTWL-CLIL lesson plans, a Science Vocabulary Knowledge test, and a Science Content Knowledge test. All research instruments were validated by both content and language experts. The target groups were 3 levels of secondary school students studying at a large secondary school in Bangkok. The research findings were as follows: 1) the mean scores of the students in the three groups increased by a statistical significance of 0.05 for both vocabulary knowledge and science content knowledge after the implementation of the intervention, and 2) the qualitative results indicated that all students perceived the instruction of ESTWL and the CLIL approach to be positive. The study suggested a vocabulary pedagogy for science and language teachers for use in CLIL environments.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Afitska, O. (2016). Scaffolding learning: Developing materials to support the learning of science and language by non-native English-speaking students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090993
Andazola, M. (2019). Vocabulary instruction: impacts of using a science notebook in a dual language setting to teach science vocabulary and content [Master's thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. UNL Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnstudent/111/
Andrade, M. S. (2006). International students in English-speaking universities: Adjustment factors. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240906065589
Armbruster, B. B., & Nagy, W. E. (1992). Vocabulary in content area lessons. The Reading Teacher, 45(7), 550-551.
Ball, P., & Kelly, K. (2016). Putting CLIL into practice: Oxford handbooks for language teachers. Oxford University Press.
Başıbek, N., Dolmacı, M., Cengiz, B. C., Bür, B., Dilek, Y., & Kara, B. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of English medium instruction at engineering departments of higher education: A study on partial English medium instruction at some state universities in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1819-1825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240906065589
Beaudin, C. (2021). A classroom-based evaluation on the implementation of CLIL for primary school education in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning, 46(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00093-3
Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., Bergström, M., & Södergård, M. (2006). Exploring dual-focused education: Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs. VASAA.
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2021). CLIL vs EMI: Different approaches or the same dog with a different collar? In M. L. Carrió-Pastor & B. Bellés-Fortuño (Eds.), Teaching language and content in multicultural and multilingual classrooms: CLIL and EMI approaches (pp. 13-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56615-9_2
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243-262.
Chaiyaratana, S., & Ekkayokkaya, M. (2022). The Effects of dialogic teaching in CLIL science subject on English oral communication ability of primary students in English program. An Online Journal of Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.14456/ojed.2022.19.
Chan, S. (2015). Linguistic challenges in the mathematical register for EFL learners: Linguistic and multimodal strategies to help learners tackle mathematics word problems. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988114
Chang, Y. Y. (2010). English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2(1), 53-82.
Chow, B. W. Y., Hui, A. N. N., Li, Z., & Dong, Y. (2023). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1408-1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2004). Identifying technical vocabulary. System, 32(2), 251-263.
Cooter Jr, R. B., & Flynt, E. S. (1996). Teaching reading in the content areas: Developing content literacy for all students. Prentice-Hall.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). The CLIL tool kit: Transforming theory into practice. In D. Coyle, P. Hood & D. Marsh (Eds), CLIL: Content and language integrated learning (pp. 45-73). Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Croyle, J. & Chaturongakul, P., (2015). An investigation into student and teacher difficulties with English language science instruction at a late partial immersion English program in Northeastern Thailand. [Master’s Independent Study, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:104313
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139-157). Carl Winter.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010
Dang, T. N. Y. (2020). Corpus-based word lists in second language vocabulary research, learning, and teaching. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 288-303). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-19
Dearden, J. (2018). The changing roles of EMI academics and English language specialists. In Y. Kırkgöz & K. Dikilitaş (Eds.), Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 323-338). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_18
Durovic, Z. (2021). Corpus linguistics methods for building ESP word lists, glossaries and dictionaries on the example of a marine engineering word list. Lexikos, 31, 259-282. https://doi.org/10.5788/31-1-1647
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015
Gilanyi, L., Gao, X. A., & Wang, S. (2023). EMI and CLIL in Asian schools: A scoping review of empirical research between 2015 and 2022. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16365
Greene, J. W., & Coxhead, A. (2015). Academic vocabulary for middle school students: Research-based lists and strategies for key content areas. Brookes Publishing.
Groves, F. H. (1995). Science v ocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 231-235.
Huang, Y. C. (2020). The Effects of elementary students' science learning in CLIL. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n2p1
Kartal, G., & Yangineksi, G. (2018). the effects of using corpus tools on EFL student teachers' learning and production of verb-noun collocations. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 55, 100-125. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.2.8
Kim, H. Y. (2016). Talking to learn: The hidden curriculum of a fifth-grade science class. English for Specific Purposes, 43, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.02.002
Kirkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and student perception of studying in an English-medium university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123.
Lialikhova, D. (2018). Triggers and constraints of lower secondary students’ willingness to communicate orally in English in a CLIL setting in the Norwegian context. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(1), 27-56.
Li, M., Lee, Y., & Liu, D. (2022). Development of a neurology word list: A corpus-based study. Language and Cognitive Science, 6(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.35534/lcs.0601003
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.
Maddalena, S. R. (2001). An investigation into how corpus analysis may be used in the second language classroom to solve some of the problems surrounding non-native speakers’ understanding of seemingly synonymous words (ED458795). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458795
Mahan, K. R., & Norheim, H. (2021). ‘Something new and different’: Student perceptions of content and language integrated learning. ELT Journal, 75(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa057
Moghadam, N. Z., & Fatemipour, H. (2014). The effect of CLIL on vocabulary development by Iranian secondary school EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2004-2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.635
Morton, T. (2013). Critically evaluating materials for CLIL: Practitioners’ practices and perspectives. In J. Grey (Ed.), Critical perspectives on language teaching materials (pp. 111-136). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384263_6
Morton, T. (2015). Vocabulary explanations in CLIL classrooms: A conversation analysis perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053283
Nikula, T. (2015). Hands-on tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and learning. System, 54, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.003
Oliver, G. (2017). Supporting English language learners in secondary science through culturally responsive teaching. In L. C. de Oliveira & K. C. Wilcox (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Preparing pre-service and in-service teachers (pp. 111-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_6
Phonlabutra, K. (2007). Learning in an English content-based program in a junior-high school in Thailand: A case study [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona]. UA Campus Repository. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/194337/azu_etd_2243_sip1_m.pdf?sequence=1
Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2019). The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368
Pun, J. K., & Thomas, N. (2020). English medium instruction: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. ELT Journal, 74(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa024
Richards, J. C., & Pun, J. (2021). A typology of English-medium instruction. RELC Journal, 54(1), 216-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220968584
Sanad, H. A., & Ahmed, M. G. (2017). Using content and language integrated learning (CLIL) to develop EFL reading comprehension skills, vocabulary skills and retention among college students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 3(4), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.12816/0041909
Suttipun, C. & Sappapan, P. (2019). A study of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) on improving Thai lower secondary school (ninth grade) students’ reading comprehension [Master’s Independent Study, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:176621
Taboada, A. (2012). Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency. Instructional Science, 40(6), 901-923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z
Tang, K. N. (2020). Challenges and importance of teaching English as a medium of instruction in Thailand international college. Journal of English as an International Language, 15(2), 97-118.
Uba, S. Y., Irudayasamy, J., & Hankins, C. A. (2023). A new computer science academic word list. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p319