The Effectiveness of Using the Word Network Technique to Teach English Vocabulary for First Graders: A Case Study of Teachers from Southern Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research explored the effectiveness of using the word network technique to teach English vocabulary to first graders in Thai Primary schools. The 150 top-frequency words used in three nationally-used textbooks were inventoried. The list of the words then was compared with the list proposed by the Ministry of Education, Thailand. The combined words based on semantic categories found in two sources of wordlists were then derived to form word networks as the models for the participating teachers. To carry out the study, both quantitative and qualitative research designs were used. In choosing the representative sample of the participants, 48 teachers who taught the English subject for first grade level and 206 first graders in Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office 1 participated voluntarily in this study. Most of the teachers had no degree in English or any related fields, but they were assigned to teach English courses. The research instruments were the students’ scores from the pre-test and post-test, the word network diagrams, classroom observations, and the teachers’ semi-structured interview. Results showed that there were significant differences between the students’ mean scores of the pre-test and post-test. The participating teachers were able to adapt the ideas of using word network technique to create the diagrams to teach vocabulary and related structure to their students after training.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34.
Aziza, S. (2022). Effective strategies for vocabulary teaching in secondary school. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 11(5), 329–337.
Barcelo-Coblijn, L., Irurtzun, A., Puigdollers, C. R., Lopez-Navarro, E., & Gomila, A. (2019). How children develop their ability to combine words: A network-based approach. Adaptive Behavior, 27(5), 307–330.
Blume, R. (1971). Humanizing teacher education. PHI Delta Kappan, 53, 411–415.
Cedar, P., & Termjai, M. (2021). Teachers’ training of English pronunciation skill through social media. Journal of Education and Innovation, 23(3), 32–47.
Coxhead, A. (2021). Vocabulary in English in tertiary contexts: Connecting research and learning. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 1–14.
Dakhi, S., & Fitria, T. N. (2019). The principles and the teaching of English vocabulary: A review. Journal of English Teaching, 5(1), 15–25.
Dugan, C. (2010). Strategic for building academic vocabulary in social studies. Shell Education.
Farrelly, M. J., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Strategies used and challenges faced by Thai EFL teachers when eliciting talk during classroom interactions in high school contexts. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–19.
Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2017). ‘A2 is normal’ - Thai secondary school English teachers’ encounters with the CEFR. RELC Journal, 49(3), 322–338.
Hadley, E. B., Dickinson, D. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2019). Building semantic networks: The impact of a vocabulary intervention on preschoolers’ depth of word knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.225
Halim, S., Wahid, R., & Halim, T. (2018). Classroom observation: A powerful tool for continuous professional development (CPD). International Journal on Language Research and Education Studies, 2(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018050801
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge University Press.
Hayikaleng, N., Nair, S. M., & Krishnasamy, H. N. (2016). Thai students’ motivation on English reading comprehension. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(6), 477–486.
He, L., & Seepho, S. (2010). A corpus-based vocabulary selection for grades 1-3 Thai EFL learners. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 49–66.
He, X., & Godfroid, A. (2018). Choosing words to teach: A novel method for vocabulary selection and its practical application. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 348–371.
Heimlich, J. E., & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. International Reading Association.
Hiebert, E. H., Goodwin, A. P., & Cervetti, G. N. (2018). Core vocabulary: Its morphological content and presence in exemplar texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 29–49.
Hills, T. T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., Sheya, A., & Smith, L. (2009). Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: Preferential attachment or preferential acquisition? Psychological Science, 20(6), 729–739.
Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). Teaching reading vocabulary (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Li, W., & Chayanuvat, A. (2021). Teaching Chinese reading in primary Thai schools: The teacher’s beliefs, perceptions and practices. Apheit International Journal, 10(1), 73–88.
Mansourzadeh, N. (2014). A comparative study of teaching vocabulary through pictures and audio-visual aids to young Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Elementary Education, 24(1), 47–59.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.
Mitchell, T. (2013, November 30). Why is English so poor in Thailand?: Students are simply just not ‘taught’ here. Ajarn Street. http://www.ajarn.com/ajarnguests/articles/why-is-english-so-poor-in-thailand/
Moskovsky, C., & Ratcheva, S. (2014). L2 fossilization: A competence or a performance phenomenon. The Open Communication Journal, 8(1), 9–17.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Neuman, S. B., Newman, E. H., & Dwyer, J. (2011). Educational effects of a vocabulary intervention on preschoolers’ word knowledge and conceptual development: A cluster randomized trial. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 249–272.
Nguyen, L. T., & Newton, J. (2021). Enhancing EFL teachers’ pronunciation pedagogy through professional learning: A Vietnamese case study. RELC Journal, 52(1), 77–93.
Noom-ura, S. (2013). English teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139–147.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Handout of teachers’ competency evaluation. Teachers and Basic Education Personnel Development Bureau.
Oljira, D. (2017). A study on problems of vocabulary teaching techniques English teachers use in Holeta primary schools: Grade seven in focus. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(6), 497–505.
Pollard-Durodola, S. D., Gonzalez, J. E., Simmons, D. C., Kwok, O., Taylor, A. B., Davis, M. J., & Simmons, L. (2011). The effects of an intensive shared book-reading intervention for preschool children at risk for vocabulary delay. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 161–183.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Saengpakdeejit, R. (2014). Strategies for dealing with vocabulary learning problems by Thai university students. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 14(1), 147–167.
Sailor, K. M. (2013). Is vocabulary growth influenced by the relations among words in a language learner’s vocabulary? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1657–1662.
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
Silverman, R. (2007). Vocabulary development of English language and English only learners in kindergarten. Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 365–383.
Sitompul, E. Y. (2013). Teaching vocabulary using flashcards and word list. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 52–58.
Surayatika, D. (2022). Teachers’ strategies in teaching English for young learners. Global Expert: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 47–58.
Swan, M., & Walter, C. (1984). The Cambridge English course 1. Cambridge University Press.
Taechoteaussanee, K. (2019, November 11). EF English proficiency index. The Standard. https://thestandard.co/ef-english-proficiency-index-2019/
Tayjasanant, C., & Suraratdecha, S. (2016). Thai EFL teachers and learners’ beliefs and readiness for autonomous learning. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 153–169.
Termprayoon, N. (2020). English teaching practices of non-major English teachers in Thai primary schools [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:191677
Thadphoothon, J. (2019). Thai school teachers’ preparedness and perceptions of more-English-in-schools (MEIS) policy. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(4), 91–100.
Yaacob, N. A. R. N., Don, Y., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2020). Educational policy implementation: Adaptation differences among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 174–180.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold.
Zhao, Y. T. Y., Jia, Z. Y., Tang, Y., Xiong, J. J., & Zhang, Y. C. (2018). Quantitative learning strategies based on word networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 491, 898–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.097