Challenges and Implications of Blended Learning Adoption in the Age of Communication Technology: A Case Study of Vietnamese Universities During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The pervasive influence of communication technology has profoundly shaped contemporary life, significantly impacting global education. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of technologies like social media platforms and massive open online courses (MOOCs) as substitutes for traditional in-person education, exposing shortcomings, particularly in regions with limited online infrastructure. Although extensive research exists on online education, including blended learning models, the challenges associated with their effective implementation remain underexplored. This study aims to address these gaps by examining the adoption of blended learning within Vietnamese universities during the pandemic through the lens of Activity Theory. This framework, which analyzes the dynamic interactions between individuals, tools, and their sociocultural environment, provides a deeper understanding of how students, educators, and institutions navigate blended learning. This study employed semi-structured interviews with administrators, lecturers, curriculum developers, and students across four campuses of a university in Vietnam. The findings highlight key challenges related to student engagement, academic dishonesty, and constraints in institutional infrastructure, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to enhance blended learning outcomes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aldosemani, T., Shepherd, C. E., & Bolliger, D. U. (2019). Perceptions of instructors teaching in Saudi blended learning environments. TechTrends, 63(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0342-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0342-1
Bao, H., & Zhao, X. (2021). Integrating MOOCs in blended-learning courses: Perspectives of teachers and students. In G. Goos (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 82–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66906-5_8
Bates, A. T., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2010). Blended learning in higher education: How students perceive integration of face-to-face and online learning experiences in a foreign policy course. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy & A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (pp. 73–81). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260789525_Bliuc_A-M_Goodyear_P_Ellis_R_2010_Blended_learning_in_higher_
education_How_students_perceive_integration_of_face-to-face_and_online_learning_experiences_in_a_foreign_policy_course_In_M_Devlin_J_Nagy_a
Bogdan, R., Bicen, H., & Holotescu, C. (2017). Trends in blended university courses with MOOCS. eLearning and Software for Education, 2, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-17-120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-17-120
Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: An academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-2020-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2020-0079
Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 118–147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
Bralić, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: Achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Brown, S., & Race, P. (2012). Using effective assessment to promote learning. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach (pp. 74 –91). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079690-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079690-5
Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.pdf
Cambre, J., Klemmer, S., & Kulkarni, C. (2018). Juxtapeer: Comparative peer review yields higher quality feedback and promotes deeper reflection. In R. Mandryk & M. Hancock (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173868
Carmona, L. J. D. M., & Irgang, L. F. (2020). Challenges on the teaching of management through blended education. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 14(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i1.40632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i1.40632
Dale, V. H., & Singer, J. (2019). Learner experiences of a blended course incorporating a MOOC on Haskell functional programming. Research in Learning Technology, 27, Article 2248. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2248
Dara, V. L., & Kesavan, C. (2024). Analyzing the concept of participatory learning: strategies, trends and future directions in education. Kybernetes. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2023-2581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2023-2581
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Linking learner factors, teaching context, and engagement patterns with MOOC learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12437
Estévez-Ayres, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Pardo, A., Crespo-García, R. M., Leony, D., Parada G., H. A., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2015). A methodology for improving active learning engineering courses with a large number of students and teachers through feedback gathering and iterative refinement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9288-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9288-6
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/266489177
Gamage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2020). MOOCs lack interactivity and collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC platforms. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 10(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558
Govea, J., Ocampo Edye, E., Revelo-Tapia, S., & Villegas-Ch, W. (2023). Optimization and scalability of educational platforms: Integration of artificial intelligence and cloud computing. Computers, 12(11), Article 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12110223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12110223
Grünewald, F., Meinel, C., Totschnig, M., & Willems, C. (2013). Designing MOOCs for the support of multiple learning styles. In G. Goos (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 371–382). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_29
Hayden, M., Thiep, L. Q. (2010). Vietnam's higher education system. In G. Harman, M. Hayden & P. T. Nghi (Eds.), Reforming higher education in Vietnam: Challenges and priorities (pp. 14–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3694-0_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3694-0_2
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235
Hill, P. (2013). Some validation of MOOC student patterns graphic. E-Literate. https://eliterate.us/validation-moocstudent-patterns-graphic
Ho, T. T. N., Nguyen, T. M. L., Pham, T. V. A., & Nguyen, T. N. (2021). Students' acceptance towards different online learning methods: A comparison between two Vietnamese educational institutions. In K. C. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 113–119). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481087
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full Report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED547237
Hunt, H. D., Davies, K., Richardson, D., Hammock, G., Akins, M., & Russ, L. (2014). It is (more) about the students: Faculty motivations and concerns regarding teaching online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), 62–71. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1036871
Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102–118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
Kelkar, S. (2016). Platformizing higher education: Computer science and the making of MOOC infrastructures. [Doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Dspace. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/107312
Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: Challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.182
Korr, J., Derwin, E. B., Greene, K., & Sokoloff, W. (2012). Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2012.649123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2012.649123
Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity Theory as a theoretical framework for the study of blended learning: A case study. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, 2009, 195–202. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228447007_Activity_Theory_as_a_theoretical_framework_for_the_study_of_blended_learning_a_case_study DOI: https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v6.9313
Lotrecchiano, G. R., McDonald, P. L., Lyons, L., Long, T., & Zajicek-Farber, M. (2013). Blended learning: Strengths, challenges, and lessons learned in an interprofessional training program. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(9), 1725–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1175-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1175-8
Ma’arop, A. H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of blended learning in higher learning institutions: A review of the literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p41
Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2018). Prediction in MOOCs: A review and future research directions. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2856808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2856808
Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386
Nguyen, T. N., Philipsen, B., Muls, J., Wang, R., & Lombaerts, K. (2018). Motivation and barriers for university teachers to apply blended learning in language classes. Journal of English as an International Language, 13, 81–99. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247032
Nguyen, L. Q. (2022). Learners' satisfaction of courses on Coursera as a massive open online course platform: A case study. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1086170. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1086170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1086170
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE.
Perkins, M., Gezgin, U. B., & Roe, J. (2020). Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00052-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00052-8
Povee, K., & Roberts, L. D. (2015). Attitudes toward mixed methods research in psychology: The best of both worlds? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.872399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.872399
Sefcik, L., Striepe, M., & Yorke, J. (2019). Mapping the landscape of academic integrity education programs: What approaches are effective? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1604942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1604942
Shah, R. K. (2020). Challenges in implementing blended learning in the post-graduation classroom in Nepal: University teachers' experiences. International Educational Scientific Research Journal, 6(10), 30–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357428900_Challenges_in_Implementing_Blended_Learning_in_the_Post-graduation_Classroom_in_Nepal_University_Teachers_Experiences
Shand, K., & Farrelly, S. G. (2018). The art of blending: Benefits and challenges of a blended course for preservice teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.10
Søndergaard, H., & Mulder, R. A. (2012). Collaborative learning through formative peer review: Pedagogy, programs and potential. Computer Science Education, 22(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.728041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.728041
Van de Oudeweetering, K., & Agirdag, O. (2018). MOOCS as accelerators of social mobility? A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 1–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26273863
Virani, S. R., Saini, J. R., & Sharma, S. (2020). Adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for blended learning: The Indian educators' perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760
Wollenschläger, M., Hattie, J., Machts, N., Möller, J., & Harms, U. (2016). What makes rubrics effective in teacher-feedback? Transparency of learning goals is not enough. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44–45, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003
Wu, H., & Luo, S. (2022). Integrating MOOCs in an undergraduate English course: Students' and teachers' perceptions of blended learning. SAGE Open, 12(2), Article 1093035. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093035
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
Yin, Y. (2016). Chinese learners' perceptions of MOOCs: A case study. [Doctoral thesis, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf]. HHUD Research Repository. https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=39371
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A cluster analysis of MOOC stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2253
Yuan, L. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A59918
Zafras, I., Kostas, A., & Sofos, A. (2020). MOOCs & participation inequalities in distance education: A systematic literature review 2009-2019. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i1.3260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i1.3260