The Effects of the Guided Dialogic Peer Feedback-Based Writing Instruction on Chinese EFL Students’ Writing Performance in an Integrated Blended Learning Environment

Main Article Content

Yin Deng
Pragasit Sitthitikul

Abstract

While extensive research exists on peer feedback and its effects on writing, there are few experimental studies that rigorously investigate the effects of guided dialogic peer feedback on students’ argumentative writing performance. This study, adopting a mixed-methods approach, examined the influence of guided dialogic peer feedback within a blended learning setting on the writing performance of 63 university students studying English as a second language (L2). The participants from two intact classes were randomly assigned as an experimental group (31 students) and a control group (32 students). Over a period of 18 weeks, the experimental group engaged in guided dialogic peer feedback instruction, whereas the control group was given traditional teaching. Both groups were assessed through writing assignments on two different topics, administered as a pre-test and a post-test. Additionally, students from the experimental group filled out a questionnaire and some engaged in semi-structured interviews after the treatment. The study’s findings, derived from a series of t-tests and ANCOVA, revealed that dialogic peer feedback significantly enhanced the students' writing performance. Furthermore, the questionnaire responses indicated a positive student perception towards this instructional approach, a sentiment echoed in the interview analyses.

Article Details

How to Cite
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2024). The Effects of the Guided Dialogic Peer Feedback-Based Writing Instruction on Chinese EFL Students’ Writing Performance in an Integrated Blended Learning Environment. REFLections, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804
Section
Research articles

References

Aborisade, P. A. (2013). Blended learning in English for academic purposes courses: A Nigerian case study. In B. Tomlinson & C. Whittaker (Eds.), Blended learning in English language teaching: Course design and implementation (pp. 35–41). British Council.

Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254–266.

Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863

Armengol-Asparó, C., Mercader, C., & Ion, G. (2020). Making peer-feedback more efficient: What conditions of its delivery make the difference? Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1840527

Baresh, E. F. (2022). Developing Libyan undergraduates' writing skills through reflective journaling: A critical literature review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1835

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.

Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. (2019). Supportive peer feedback in tertiary education: Analysis of pre-service teachers’ perceptions. Education Sciences, 9(4), Article 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040280

Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184

Chen, W. S., & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667–1671.

Cheng, H.-F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt048.0

Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.

Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474

Du, M., & Ma, M. X. (2013). The effect of feedback modes on non-English major’s writing accuracy in an EFL context. Foreign Language and Literature, 29(1), 150–153.

Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2021). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: Theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490

Feng, A., & Adamson, B. (2019). Language policies in education in the People’s Republic of China. In A. Kirkpatrick & A. J. Liddicoat (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 45–59). Routledge.

Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education, 125, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004

Gadd, M., & Parr, J. M. (2017). Practices of effective writing teachers. Reading and Writing, 30(7), 1551–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9737-1

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.

Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125

Graham, S., & Alves, R. A. (2021). Research and teaching writing. Reading and Writing, 34, 1613–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10188-9

Greenberg, K. P. (2015). Rubric use in formative assessment: A detailed behavioral rubric helps students improve their scientific writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587618

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth analysis of literature. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 116, 4596–4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992

Hains-Wesson, R., McKenzie, S., & Bangay, S. (2015). Anytime and anywhere: A case study for blended learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/7/anytime-and-anywhere-a-case-study-forblended-learning

Hewett, B. L. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00035-9

Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002

Hosseinpour, N., Biria, R., & Rezvani, E. (2019). Promoting academic writing proficiency of Iranian EFL learners through blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640525

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: Student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1794–1808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670

Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.153

Liu, M. (2013). Blended learning in a university EFL writing course: Description and evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(2), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.301-309

Lopez-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodriguez-Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2

Mahmoudi, F., & Bugra, C. (2020). The effects of using rubrics and face to face feedback in teaching writing skill in higher education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 150–158.

McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W. (2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.010

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, Article 597674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Meek, S. E., Blakemore, L., & Marks, L. (2017). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052

Murray, N., Liddicoat, A. J., Zhen, G., & Mosavian, P. (2023). Constraints on innovation in English language teaching in hinterland regions of China. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1246–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820979855

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x

Ng, W. S., & Yu, G. (2021). The impacts of dialogic interaction to engage students in peer assessment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00633-2

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002

Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592

Pond, K., Ul-Haq, R., & Wade, W. (1995). Peer review: A precursor to peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(4), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320403

Pop, A., & Slev, A. M. (2012). Maximizing EFL learning through blending. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5516–5519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.467

Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (Vol. 892). Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Ren, J. (2017). College English writing instruction for non-English majors in Mainland China: The "Output-driven, Input-enabled" hypothesis perspective. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p150

Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), Article 192. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192

Sahni, J. (2019). Does blended learning enhance student engagement? Evidence from higher education. Journal of E-Learning and Higher Education, 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.121518

Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133oa

Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889

Sejdiu, S. (2014). English language teaching and assessment in blended learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v3n2.5043

So, L., & Lee, C. H. L. (2012). Peer feedback using blended learning in L2 writing at the university level. English Teaching, 67(3), 307–337.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. Routledge.

Subramaniam, S. R., & Muniandy, B. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom on students’ engagement. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9343-y

Sun, W., & Rong, X. L. (2021). English education reform in Asian countries. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.838

Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003

Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132

Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003

Vattøy, K.-D., Gamlem, S. M., & Rogne, W. M. (2020). Examining students’ feedback engagement and assessment experiences: A mixed study. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2325–2337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1723523

Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Feedback in Writing: Issues and Challenges, 19, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008

Watson, J. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Promising practices in online learning. North American Council for Online Learning.

Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240.

Wen, Q. F. (2005). A critique of the length approach. Modern Foreign Languages, 3, 308–311.

Weng, F., Ye, S. X., & Xue, W. (2023). The effects of peer feedback on L2 students’ writing motivation: An experimental study in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00669-y

Winstone, N. (2019). Facilitating students’ use of feedback: Capturing and tracking impact using digital tools. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education (pp. 225–242). Springer International Publishing.

Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education & Training, 56(2/3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049

Wood, J. (2021). Making peer feedback work: The contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004

Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Students’ reflection on feedback in L2 writing in blended learning. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 235–261.

Yu, S. (2021). Feedback-giving practice for L2 writing teachers: Friend or foe? Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, Article 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100798

Zeng, J., Ponce, A. R., & Li, Y. (2023). English linguistic neo-imperialism in the era of globalization: A conceptual viewpoint. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1149471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149471

Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2022). Online formative peer feedback in Chinese contexts at the tertiary Level: A critical review on its design, impacts and influencing factors. Computers & Education, 176, Article 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104341

Zhang, B. (2020). Application of flipped classroom in college English teaching of Chinese undergraduate students majoring in arts and physical education. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on education, language and inter-cultural communication (ELIC 2020) (pp. 188-190). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201127.037

Zhang, Z. (2019). The strategies of college English writing. Sino-US English Teaching, 16(5), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2019.05.003

Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417