Understanding the Ecopoetics Pedagogy of Preservice English as a Second Language Teachers: A Case Study Using Robert Frost’s Fire and Ice
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The prevalence of ecological and environmental hazards that adversely impact human lives necessitates the intensification of ecological literacy for the populace. This deepening of people’s knowledge of environmental science for disaster risk reduction and mitigation can be realized through literary pedagogy centering on ecocriticism. Hence, this qualitative study utilizing a case study approach aims to describe the pedagogy of ecopoetics as performed by a group of preservice teachers of English as a Second Language (ESL). By examining the insights they gained from a critical analysis of Robert Frost’s poem “Fire and Ice”, scientific constructs can be identified that can be translated into learning opportunities, learning tasks and assessment tools that can promote ecological literacy. The qualitative data gathered from the participants’ analysis of ecopoetry reveal their scientific constructs in three major themes: risk perception, risk analysis, and risk reduction and mitigation. These served as their abstractions and realizations from the ecocritical interpretation of the provided poem. These generated insights dealing with consequences of human action, nature’s retribution, earth’s destruction, and valuing the environment for sustainability and resilience derived from their transactional reading of the poem are considered by the participants to be the core of teaching ecopoetics to promote ecological literacy. Also, the data gathered from the transcript of the conducted Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with the participants reveal their preference for collaborative viewing and representing activities in designing learning opportunities, and on reflective writing and performance tasks in assessing intended learning outcomes to inculcate ecological literacy among their future students. Moreover, the framework developed by the researcher exemplifies the preservice teachers’ pedagogy of ecopoetics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Jamal, D. A., & Al-Omari, W. (2014). Thinking green: Analyzing EFL textbooks in light of ecological education themes. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(14), 151–157.
Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, student learning and classroom practice: A review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1–6.
Anabaraonye, B., Nji, I., & Hope, J. (2018). Poetry as a valuable tool for climate change education for global sustainability. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 9(9), 81–85.
Barbosa, L. M., Fonseca, B., Dal-Farra, R. A., & Lopes, L. A. (2014). Teaching science education with poetry. Creative Education, 5, 1745–1749. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.519195
Cai, W., & Sankaran, G. (2015). Promoting critical thinking through an interdisciplinary study abroad program. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 38–49.
Calderón Moya-Méndez, N., & Zwart, H. (2022). Science and poetry: Poems as an educational tool for biology teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17, 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10118-3
Damico, J. S., Baildon, M., & Panos, A. (2020). Climate justice literacy: Stories-we-live-by, ecolinguistics, and classroom practice. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1051
Darko, E. N. K. O., & Wang, X. D. (2021). Research on the influence of collaborative learning among Bachelor of Education (Management) students in University of Cape Coast, Ghana. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9, 2816–2833. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.96157
Donald, C. & Barker, M. (2016). Science and poetry as allies in school learning. Educational Research for Social Change, 5(2), 51–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2016/v5i2a4
Frye, E. M., Trathen, W., & Schlagal, B. (2011). Extending acrostic poetry into content learning: a scaffolding framework. The Reading Teacher, 63, 591–595.
Furlan, P., Kitson, H., & Andes, C. (2007). Chemistry, poetry, and artistic illustration: an interdisciplinary approach to teaching and promoting chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1625–1630.
Goulah, J. (2017). Climate change and TESOL: Language, literacies, and the creation of eco-ethical consciousness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.277
Lustyantie, N. (2015). Environmental education in the language and literature learning in elementary education. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.991
McGuire, N. M. (2015). Environmental education and behavioral change: An identity-based environmental education model. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(5), 695–715.
Micalay-Hurtado, M., & Poole, R. (2022). Eco-critical language awareness for English language teaching (ELT): Promoting justice, wellbeing, and sustainability in the classroom. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0023
Midgette, K., Stewart, O., & Gonzales, J. (2023). Teaching with multimodal texts through a critical literacy lens within an English as a foreign language classroom context. Anglistics and Americanistics, 20, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.15421/382313
Mishra, S. K. (2016). Ecocriticism: A study of environmental issues in literature. BRICS Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 168–170.
Mohamad Ghazali, M. A. I., Ali, Z., & Abdul Rahim, A. A. (2022). Adopting Design and Development Research (DDR) approach in framing the ESL preservice teachers’ roles and responsibilities to teach writing skills. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13(6), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s06.098
Mpofu, N., & De Jager, L. J. (2018). Exploring beginner teachers’ sources of knowledge for teaching literature in ESL classrooms. English Teaching & Learning, 42(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42321-018-0003-7
Myren-Svelstad, P. E. (2020). Sustainable literary competence: Connecting literature education to education for sustainability. Humanities, 9(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040141k
Norins, N. (2023). Teacher perceptions on the impacts of interdisciplinary studies focused on critical thinking strategies in gifted and talented middle school students [Doctorate dissertation, Northeastern University]. Northeastern University Repository. https://doi.org/10.17760/d20474735
Nugraeni, M. H., & Paidi. (2021). Instructional designs to promote scientific literacy on students and teachers: A review study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1), Article 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012042
Paradewari, D. S., Avillanova, A. A., & Lasar, A. B. (2018). Promoting environmental awareness in learning contexts. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v1i2.1322
Putri, I. G. A. P. E. (2018). Critical environmental education in tertiary English language teaching (ELT): A collaborative digital storytelling project. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13280
Qiao, R. (2022). A theoretical analysis of approaches to enhance students’ grit and academic engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 889509. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889509
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work (1st ed.). Southern Illinois University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/42573
Santhakumari, M., & Sagar, N. (2020). The environmental threats our world is facing today. In C. Hussain (Ed.), Handbook of environmental materials management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_180-1
Stibbe, A. (2004). Environmental education across cultures: Beyond the discourse of shallow environmentalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 4(4), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470408668875
Sunassee, A., Bokhoree, C., & Patrizio, A. (2021). Students’ empathy for the environment through eco-art place-based education: A review. Ecologies, 2(2), 214–247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies2020013
Tabuenca, B., Moreno-Sancho, J., Arquero-Gallego, J., Greller, W., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2023). Generating an environmental awareness system for learning using IoT technology. Internet of Things, 22, Article 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100756
Wazed Kabir, K. M., & Jamil, R. (2020). Realism and transcendentalism in the selected poems of Robert Frost: The juxtaposition of nature and humanity. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 25(2), 46–65.
Wilson, K. G. (2001). Some notes on theoretical constructs: Types and validation from a contextual behavioral perspective. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1(2), 205–215. https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen1/num2/23/some-notes-on-theoretical-constructs-types-EN.pdf
Zhengdong, G., Zhujun, A., & Fulan, L. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: How are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 697045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045
