How active is ‘active’? Overcoming Misconceptions and Optimizing Pedagogical Practices of Active Learning in EFL Classrooms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Active Learning (AL) has emerged as a promising pedagogical alternative to traditional passive learning across various educational fields, including English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. Despite its increasing adoption, discrepancies and misconceptions persist in its implementation within EFL contexts. This review article first delineates the core principles of AL as recognised in contemporary educational literature. It then addresses prevalent misunderstandings that hinder effective practice. In response, the paper proposes an updated, comprehensive framework tailored to EFL classrooms, with practical recommendations for instructional design, activity integration, and the strategic use of educational technologies, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Finally, it outlines key criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of AL, focusing on student achievement, attitudes, and engagement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alzahrani, M. (2018). The learning experience of international students in Canada: Progressive educational theory and passive learning styles. English Language Teaching, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n7p76
Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316636732
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
Caine, N. A. (2020). Integrating active learning into EFL course design: A case study. Nagasaki University Repository, 53(4), 23–39. https://reposit.sun.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10561/1614/1/v53n4p23_caine.pdf
Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387724
Chau, T. H. T., & Pham, Q. V. B. (2023). EFL learners’ perception of Class Point Tool application in enhancing their satisfaction and active learning in classroom. Vietnam Journal of Education, 7(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2023.309
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (Eds.). (2008). Attitudes and attitude change (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838068
Dayag, J. D., & Abdalla, M. (2023). Facilitating EFL students’ active learning through digital portfolio development. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(6).72
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Devira, M. (2020). Revisiting the implementation of active learning pedagogy in EFL classrooms. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15089
Edwards, S. (2015). Active learning in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 46(5), 26–32.
Fallahi, C. R., Levine, L. E., Nicoll-Senft, J. M., Tessier, J. T., Watson, C. L., & Wood, R. M. (2009). Using Fink's integrated course design: How a book changed our students' learning, our university, and ourselves. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2009(119), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.363
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum, 8, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31616
Gasmi, A. A., & Nadabi, Z. S. A. (2023). An exploratory study of learners’ perceptions about the effectiveness of active learning approaches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.10
Gordy, X. Z., Zhang L., Sullivan, A. L., Haynie, L., Richards-Moore, L., Bailey, J. H. (2018). A Multi-disciplinary empirical investigation of active learning classroom’s effects on student learning. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.2.1.003
Hao, Q., Barnes, B., & Jing, M. (2021). Quantifying the effects of active learning environments: Separating physical learning classrooms from pedagogical approaches. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09320-3
Ho, H. X., Nguyen, C. T., & Dinh, D. T. (2023). EFL teachers’ perceptions about implementing active learning techniques in teaching speaking. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(5), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i5.4773
Hockly, N. (2024). Nicky Hockly’s 30 essentials for using artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Holtham, C. (2023). Deploying generative AI to draft a roleplay simulation of difficult conversations about inclusivity. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.127
Jacobs, G. M., & Toh-Heng, H. L. (2013). Small steps towards student-centred learning. In P. Mandal (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on managing the Asian century (pp. 55–64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-61-0_7
Jenkins, D. (2011). Exploring instructional strategies and learning goals in undergraduate leadership education [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. Digital Commons USF. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/3168/
Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Kazmi, S. B. A., & Riaz, U. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning activities and student participation. In K. Daniels, C. Elliott, S. Finley, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Learning and teaching in higher education perspectives from a business (pp. 177–183). School Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975087
Kessler, M. (2022). Multimodality. ELT Journal, 76(4), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac028
Kopp, M. L., Witte, C. E., & Vernon, G. M. (2025). A lesson plan for planning lessons. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 20(1), e43–e47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.07.024
Maldonado-Trapp, A., & Bruna, C. (2024). The evolution of active learning in response to the pandemic: The role of technology. In N. Rezaei (Ed.), The COVID-19 aftermath: Volume II: Lessons learned (pp. 247–261). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61943-4_16
Matsushita, K. (2018). An invitation to deep active learning. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning: Toward greater depth in university education (pp. 15–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_2
Mizokami, S. (2018). Deep active learning from the perspective of active learning theory. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning: Toward greater depth in university education (pp. 79–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_5
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Oroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.333
Pizarro, C., & Toro, M. (2023). Neuroscience of learning and emotional processing. In P. Fossa & C. Cortés-Rivera (Eds.), Affectivity and learning: Bridging the gap between neurosciences, cultural and cognitive psychology (pp. 473–494). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31709-5_25
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rouzegar, H., & Makrehchi, M. (2024). Generative AI for enhancing active learning in education: A comparative study of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in crafting customized test questions. Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37, 1–12. https://caiac.pubpub.org/pub/kmn55wd2/release/1
Saiphet, P. (2018). The effects of active learning on Thai university students’ motivation to learn English. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 13(4), 37–50.
Sajidin, S., & Ashadi, A. (2021). How do their ‘group work’ work as an active learning strategy of EFL learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.36234
Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person-in-context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21409
Seemanath, P., & Watanapokakul, S. (2024). Active learning in English at Work: Assessing effectiveness and EFL undergraduate student attitudes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 538–571. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270426
Solikhah, N., & Sofi, M. J. (2023). Teacher’s strategies for stimulating EFL students’ active learning in an Indonesian senior high school. Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.28918/erudita.v3i2.2147
Stark, L., Malkmus, E., Stark, R., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2018). Learning-related emotions in multimedia learning: An application of control-value theory. Learning and Instruction, 58, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.003
Thongthee, S. (2020). Effects of the active learning approach on the English achievement of Thai EFL secondary school students [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University TU Digital Collections Archive. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:191681
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy.
Waluyo, B. (2020). Learning outcomes of a general English course implementing multiple E-learning technologies and active learning concepts. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.10.160
Waniek, I., & Nae, N. (2017). Active learning in Japan and Europe. Euromentor Journal - Studies about Education, 8(4), 82–97.
Watanapokakul, S. (2024). Enhancing active grammar learning in a synchronous online EFL undergraduate Classroom: Development and assessment of the LPCR online instructional model. rEFLections, 31(3), 990–1022. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.276044
Watkins, C., Carnell, E., & Lodge, C. (2007). Effective learning in classrooms. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211472
Yamauchi, M. (2020). Active learning in the Japanese EFL classroom. Chiba University of Commerce Bulletin, 57(3), 71–94.
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3
Yuh, A. H., & Thamrongsotthisakul, W. (2020). The concept of active learning in the 21st Century: Who is active and what is considered as “active” in active learning? The Golden Teak: Humanity and Social Science Journal, 26(2), 91–99.
Yusuk, S. (2021). An implementation of active learning in Thai university students’ English language classroom. Journal of Liberal Arts, Maejo University, 9(1), 112–135.
