Examining Phonetic Cues in English Lexical Stress: A Comparative Study of Yemeni EFL Learners and American Speakers Across Diverse Syllable Patterns, Word Lengths, and Proficiency Levels

Main Article Content

Samah Yaslam
Paramaswari Jaganathan

Abstract

Producing English lexical stress involves manipulating phonetic cues such as vowel duration, intensity, and fundamental frequency (F0). Existing literature presents diverse perspectives on how EFL learners utilize these prosodic features to realize stress (Fry, 1955; Modesto & Barbosa, 2019; Saha & Mandal, 2018; Zhang & Francis, 2010; Zuraiq & Sereno, 2021). However, inconsistencies in methodology and limited stimulus sets across previous studies hinder cross-study comparisons. Addressing this gap, the present study examines whether the use of these cues by Arab EFL learners remains consistent across disyllabic and trisyllabic words or varies according to syllabic structure and word length. A total of 65 Yemeni undergraduates at two proficiency levels and 10 American native speakers were recruited to produce 21 disyllabic and 21 trisyllabic words in which the stressed syllable was clearly marked. The analysis revealed that similar to American speakers, Yemeni EFL learners employed vowel duration, intensity, and F0 to distinguish stressed syllables from unstressed ones. Results showed significant differences in the stressed-to-unstressed vowel ratio between Yemeni learners and American speakers. American speakers exhibited a more pronounced reduction in vowel duration, intensity, and F0 for unstressed syllables compared to Yemeni EFL learners. Additionally, the study found that the use of phonetic correlates varies between disyllabic and trisyllabic words and across different proficiency levels, indicating that the production of English lexical stress is influenced by syllable pattern, proficiency level and word length. These findings highlight the complexity of stress production in EFL learners and suggest that instructional strategies should consider these variabilities to improve learners’ pronunciation skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yaslam, S., & Jaganathan, P. (2025). Examining Phonetic Cues in English Lexical Stress: A Comparative Study of Yemeni EFL Learners and American Speakers Across Diverse Syllable Patterns, Word Lengths, and Proficiency Levels. rEFLections, 32(2), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i2.280863
Section
Research articles

References

Ahmed Misfer, Z., & Ahmed Busabaa, N. (2019). Stress placement and the difficulties encountered by female EFL students in the Saudi Arabian context. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue: The Dynamics of EFL in Saudi Arabia, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/efl1.3

Ali, H. S., & Abdalla, J. K. (2021). Pronunciation of English stress by Iraqi Arabic and Kurdish EFL learners. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 28(12, Part 1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.28.12.1.2021.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.28.12.1.2021.24

Al-Khulaidi, M. (2017). Word stress in Yemeni English: A phonetic study. International Multidisciplinary Journal Press.

Al-Maghrabi, R. (2021). A phonological study of the influence of Arabic stress on the pronunciation of English words by Saudi ESL learners. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, 73, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.73.2021.600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.73.2021.600

Almbark, R., Bouchhioua, N., & Hellmuth, S. (2014). Acquiring the phonetics and phonology of English word stress: Comparing learners from different L1 backgrounds. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 19–35. https://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/3_Almbark_etal_Vol5.pdf

Al-Thalab, H. S. A., Yap, N. T., Nimehchisalem, V., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2018). Perception of English lexical stress: Some insights for English pronunciation lessons for Iraqi ESL learners. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 8(2), 209–224.

Altmann, H., & Kabak, B. (2015). English word stress in L2 and postcolonial varieties: Systematicity and variation. In U. Gut, R. Fuchs, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp. 185–208). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346084-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346084-010

Anani, M. (1989). Incorrect stress placement in the case of Arab learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 27(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1989.27.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1989.27.1.15

Aziz, Y. Y. (1980). Some problems of English word-stress for the Iraqi learner. English Language Teaching Journal, 34(2), 104–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/34.2.104

Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology, 3, 255–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023, December 30). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Praat. https://www.praat.org

Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(4), 1468–1479. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40(2), 141–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000203

Field, J. E. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487

Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.S. (1989). An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 35–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007828

Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908022

Fry, D. B. (1959). Theoretical aspects of mechanical speech recognition. Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers, 19(4), 211–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/jbire.1959.0026

Ghaith, S. (1993). The assignment of primary stress to words by some Arab speakers. System, 21(3), 381–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90028-F

Ghosh, M., & Levis, J. M. (2021). Vowel quality and direction of stress shift in a predictive model explaining the varying impact of misplaced word stress: Evidence from English. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 628780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.628780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.628780

Guo, X. (2022). Acoustic correlates of English lexical stress produced by Chinese dialect speakers compared to native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 796252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796252

Helal, S. (2014). Stress in English: Prosodic and rhythmic complexity for Arab learners. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. https://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/20_Helal_Vol5.pdf

Jaiprasong, S., & Pongpairoj, N. (2020). L2 production of English word stress by L1 Thai learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 142–157. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/243699

Jeong, H., Thorén, B., & Othman, J. (2020). Effect of altering three phonetic features on intelligibility of English as a lingua franca: A Malaysian speaker and Swedish listeners. Asian Englishes, 22(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1536817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1536817

Jung, Y. J., & Rhee, S. C. (2018). Acoustic analysis of English lexical stress produced by Korean, Japanese and Taiwanese-Chinese speakers. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2018.10.1.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2018.10.1.015

Koffi, E. (2021). Relevant acoustic phonetics of L2 English: Focus on intelligibility. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003106418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003106418

Ladefoged, J. (2001). Sounds from Peter Ladefoged’s books. Blackwell Publishers.

Lee, G., Shin, D. J., & Garcia, M. T. M. (2019). Perception of lexical stress and sentence focus by Korean-speaking and Spanish-speaking L2 learners of English. Language Sciences, 72, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.01.002

Levis, J. (2018). Word stress and intelligibility. In Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation (pp. 100–124). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564

Liu, D. (2017). The acquisition of English word stress by Mandarin EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 196–201. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1160997.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p196

Modesto, F., & Barbosa, P. A. (2019). Unraveling foreign accent prosody: Production and perception of lexical stress in English by Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 27(1), 165–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.27.1.165-189

Mousikou, P., Strycharczuk, P., & Rastle, K. (2024). Acoustic correlates of stress in speech perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 136, Article 104509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104509

Saha, S. N., & Mandal, S. K. D. (2018). Phonetic realization of English lexical stress by native (L1) Bengali speakers compared to native (L1) English speakers. Computer Speech & Language, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.06.006

Sung, E. (2025). The role of acoustic cues in lexical stress recognition of real and nonce words by Korean learners of English. 영어학, 25, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.25..202502.247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.25..202502.247

Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909103528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909103528

Tuan, D. M. (2018). English lexical stress assignment by EFL learners: Insights from a Vietnamese context. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(11), 59–70.

Younes, M. A. (1984). The stressing of final superheavy syllables by Saudi learners of English: Implications for the contrastive analysis hypothesis. In S. Flynn & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd annual linguistics conference (pp. 1–10). Irbid, Jordan.

Youssef, A., & Mazurkewich, I. (1998). The acquisition of English metrical parameters and syllable structure by adult native speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene dialect). In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 303–332). Psychology Press.

Zhang, Y., Nissen, S. L., & Francis, A. L. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498–4513. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2902165

Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.002

Zuraiq, W., & Sereno, J. A. (2021). Production of English lexical stress by Arabic speakers. In A. M. Nyvad, M. Hejná, A. Højen, M. K. Hansen, & M. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 290–309). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.012