The Presentation of Speech Acts in EFL Textbooks Used in Primary and Secondary Schools in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the presence and distribution of speech acts in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks used in Thai primary and secondary schools. Additionally, this study explores the perspectives of Thai EFL teachers on the effectiveness of these textbooks in supporting the teaching and learning of speech acts. A mixed methods approach was employed. The quantitative component involved a content analysis of 57 EFL textbooks, and the qualitative component involved in-depth interviews with four English teachers. The findings revealed variations in speech act representation between grade levels and textbook series, with a focus on requests/commands, suggestions/advice, and greetings. Interview participants were generally satisfied with the coverage and authenticity of speech act representation in textbooks used in their classes but suggested including a broader range of scenarios demonstrating speech act use and providing more detailed explanations of speech act use in textbooks. The results have implications for textbook developers, highlighting the need to ensure balanced coverage of speech acts across grade levels and to provide more detailed explanations including metapragmatic information and practical examples. The study also suggests the need for schools to evaluate textbooks for adequate exposure to varied speech acts and comprehensive instructions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmed, F. A. A., Mohammadzadeh, B., & Mazlum, F. (2023). An in-depth analysis of the representation of speech acts and language functions in Libyan public high school English textbooks. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056745
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge University Press.
Barron, A. (2016). Developing pragmatic competence using EFL textbooks: Focus on requests. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 7(1), 2172– 2179. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2016.0288
Bui, L., & Nguyen, T. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of Vietnamese EFL textbooks: The case of disagreement. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(4), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.4.1.754
Chen, T.-I., Chung, H.-C., & Lin, S.-K. (2023). The effect of applying language picture books in reciprocal teaching on students’ language learning motivations. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218857
Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New Approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hoshangabadwala, A. (2015). Student perceptions of textbook layout and learnability in private schools. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i1.46
Ishihara, N. (2010). Adapting textbooks for teaching pragmatics. In N. Ishihara & A. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 145–165). Longman.
Jakupčević, E., & Portolan, M. C. (2021). An analysis of pragmatic content in EFL textbooks for young learners in Croatia. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820986936
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In N. John & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). John Benjamins.
Ji, P. (2007). Exploring pragmatic knowledge in college English textbooks. CELEA Journal, 30(5), 109–119.
Jiang, S., & Deng, L. (2022). Pragmatic analysis of EFL textbooks: The explicit representation of speech acts in senior high textbooks in China. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 6(2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i2.392
Kasper, G. (1996). Introduction: Interlanguage pragmatics in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100014856
Kim, D., & Hall, J. K. (2002). The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. Modern Language Journal, 86, 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00153
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
LoCastro, V. (2012). Pragmatics for language educators: A sociolinguistic perspective. Routledge.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008).
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2024, June 5). ฐานข้อมูลบัญชีกำหนดสื่่อการเรียนรู้สำหรับเลือกใช้ในสถานศึกษาตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551 [The database of learning media accounts for selection in educational institutions according to basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551]. Ministry of Education. http://academic.obec.go.th/textbook/web
Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (1990). The learning of complex speech act behaviour. TESL Canada Journal, 7(2), 45–65.
https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v7i2.568
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw010
Ronan, P. (2015). Categorizing expressive speech acts in the pragmatically annotated SPICE Ireland corpus. ICAME Journal, 39, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2015-0002
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
Savić, M., & Myrset, A. (2022). “But in England they’re certainly very polite, so you mustn’t forget that”: Young EFL learners making sense of pragmatic practices. In T. McConachy & A. J. Liddicoat (Eds.), Teaching and learning second language pragmatics for intercultural understanding (pp. 40–59). Routledge.
Schauer, G. A. (2019). Teaching and learning English in the primary school: Interlanguage pragmatics in the EFL context. Springer.
Schauer, G. A. (2022). Teaching L2 pragmatics to young learners. Applied Pragmatics, 4(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00006.sch
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000018
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444814000263
Takahashi, S. (2010). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In A. Martinez-Flor & E. Uso-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 127–144). John Benjamins.
Ton Nu, A. T., & Murray, J. (2020). Pragmatic content in EFL textbooks: An investigation into Vietnamese national teaching materials. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1–29. https://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej95/a8.pdf
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8, 1–17. https://tesl-ej.org/ej30/a3.html
Wichien, S. (2012). Pragmatic features in English course materials used at a Thai university [Doctoral dissertation, Prince of Songkla University]. PSU Knowledge Bank. https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/handle/2010/8726
