Linear Distance, Agreement Attraction, and WM Effects on L1 Thai Learners’ Processing of L2 English Third-Person Singular Subject-Verb Agreement
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of linear distance, agreement attraction, and working memory (WM) on the processing of English third-person singular subject-verb agreement by second language (L2) learners whose first language (L1) is Thai. Grounded in the Linear Distance Hypothesis (Gibson, 1998, 2000), the study hypothesized that linear distance, agreement attraction, and WM would affect L1 Thai/L2 English learners’ processing of the agreement in question. Thirty Thai-speaking nonnative speakers (NNSs) with advanced L2 proficiency and 30 native speakers (NSs) were included. A word-by-word self-paced reading task was employed to determine the three effects. The results revealed longer reading times (RTs) in the long-distance context (e.g., ‘The leaders in the cars meet on a monthly basis.’) compared to the short-distance counterpart (e.g., ‘The waiter lives in a small town.’) in the critical region, i.e., the verb, for both the NNSs and the NSs. The agreement attraction effect was not observed in either the NS or the NNS data as similar RTs were obtained between the matched (e.g., ‘The teen on the ladder works on her summer break.’) and mismatched (e.g., ‘*The lawyers on the ship travels from city to city.’) conditions. This was speculated to be due to the mismatch asymmetry effect (Barker & Nicol, 2000). WM and its interaction effects with linear distance and agreement attraction were partially observed as the low WM group exhibited shorter RTs in the ungrammatical-mismatched compared to the high WM counterpart. The effect of WM was assumed to be moderated by the NNSs’ high proficiency.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
Barker, J., & Nicol, J. (2000). Word frequency effects on the processing of subject–verb number agreement. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005180608787
Bian, J., Zhang, H., & Sun, C. (2021). An ERP Study on attraction effects in advanced L2 learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616804
Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90007-K
Bock, J. K., & Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308406949
Bock, J. K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/s136672890700291x
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060206
Conway A. R. A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O., & Engel, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
Coughlin, C., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000890
Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310373326
Eberhard, K. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject–verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 147–164.
Eberhard, K., Cutting, C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112(3), 531–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755604
Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). Routledge.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1
Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 94–126). MIT Press.
Hawkins, J. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75, 244–285.
https://doi.org/10.2307/417261
Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004
Hoshino, N., Dussias, P., & Kroll, J. (2010). Processing subject-verb agreement in a second language depends on proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS1366728909990034
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18(2), 95–136. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr195oa
Jegerski, J. (2016). Number attraction effects in near-native Spanish sentence comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311400059X
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001298
Jiang, N. (2018). Second language processing: An introduction. Routledge.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000509
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
Kaan, E. (2002). Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014978917769
Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246–273. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.248862
Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59(3), 503–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00516.x
Keating, G. D. (2010). The effects of linear distance and working memory on the processing of gender agreement in Spanish. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 113–134). John Benjamins. https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.53.05kea
Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2017). Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315623322
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898672500216
Lempert, H. (2016). Late L2ers can acquire grammatical features that do not occur in their L1: Evidence from the effect of animacy on verb agreement in L1 Chinese. Memory & Cognition, 44, 538–553. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0583-6
Li, X. (2023, October 25). L2 proficiency, age of L2 acquisition, and working memory: Evidence from Mandarin–English bilingual students. BERA. Retrieved June 11, 2024 from https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/l2-proficiency-age-of-l2-acquisition-and-working-memory-evidence-from-mandarin-english-bilingualstudents
Liu, X., & Wang, W. (2019). The effect of distance on sentence processing by older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02455
Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2015). Second language sensitivity to agreement errors: Evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(6), 1283–1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02455
MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 56–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-k
Manchón, R. M., McBride, S., Mellado Martínez, M. D., & Vasylets, O. (2023). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 737–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000141
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 861–904. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716418000036
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Erlbaum.
Nation, P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. Benjamins.
Nicol, J., Forster, K., & Veres, C. (1997). Subject–verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2497
Nicol, J., & Greth, D. (2003). Production of subject-verb agreement in Spanish as a second language. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.196
O'Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2003) A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000172
O’Grady, W. (2006). The problem of verbal inflection in second language acquisition. Proceedings of the 11th Conferences of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 169-190.
Ocampo, S. (2013). Morphological variability in long-distance subject-verb agreement: A study of native and nonnative processing [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The University of Kansas.
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
Phinitkit, S. (2015). การพัฒนาโปรแกรมคอมพิวเตอร์ประเมินสมรรถนะความจำขณะคิดด้านภาษาสำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาตอนปลาย [Computer program development for phonological working memory capacity assessment for Mathayom 4-6 students] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Burapha University.
Pongpairoj, N. (2002). Thai university undergraduates’ errors in English writing. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 20, 66–99. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/joling/article/view/180716
Rattanasak, S., Pongpairoj, N., & Christianson, K. (2024). Effects of working memory capacity and distance-based complexity on agreement processing: A crosslinguistic competition account. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(3), 1151–1176. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0035
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 607–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000327
Shibuya, M., & Wakabayashi, S. (2008). Why are L2 learners not always sensitive to subject-verb agreement? EUROSLA Yearbook, 8, 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.8.13shi
Siriwittayakorn, T., & Miyamoto, E. T. (2019). Thai learners of English are sensitive to number-agreement violations. In R. Otoguro, M. Komachi, & T. Ohkuma (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 33) (pp. 237–243). Waseda Institute for the Study of Language and Information, Waseda University.
Timyam, N. (2018). Patterns and causes of deviations in English verbal inflectional suffixes among Thai ELF learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2401-01
Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (1998). Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production. Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition, 68(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00041-9
Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.
Wen, Z., & Jackson, D. O. (2022). Working memory. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 54–66). Routledge.
Wilson, B. G., & Miyamoto, E. T. (2015, November 28-29). Proficiency effects in L2 processing of English number agreement across structurally complex material [Paper presentation]. The 151st Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Japan, Nagoya University, Japan.
