Exploring the Transformative Potential of Blended Learning with MOOCs: A Case Study in Vietnamese Higher Education Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The significant influence of communication technologies, most evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to a fundamental shift in global education. This study investigates the advantages of incorporating a blended learning approach, particularly by integrating Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) into undergraduate programs at a university in Vietnam. The study employs a qualitative methodology, focusing on conducting semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders, including administrators, lecturers, curriculum developers, and students. Through this approach, the study aims to uncover the primary advantages seen by these individuals. The findings highlight numerous crucial benefits associated with blended learning through MOOCs. Stakeholders place significant emphasis on improving professional knowledge and developing 21st-century skills. They aim to promote learner independence, encourage a lifetime commitment to learning, and prepare individuals for future career prospects. These findings provide practical insights into the effectiveness of blended learning using MOOCs and contribute to the broader discussion on modern educational paradigms. Notably, they highlight the alignment of these models with the evolving needs of students and the shifting expectations of the contemporary labor market.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Appel, C., & Fernández, S. S. (2022). Reimagining language learning in higher education: Key-roles for technology. In M. Auer, A. Pester, & D. May (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems (pp. 581–602). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04286-7_28
Anh, T. V., Nguyen, H. T. T., & Linh, N. T. M. (2019). Digital transformation: A digital learning case study. In Y. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2019 the world symposium on software engineering (pp. 119–124). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362125.3362135
Bao, H., & Zhao, X. (2021). Integrating MOOCs in blended-learning courses: Perspectives of teachers and students. In G. Goos (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 82–93). Springer.
Bárcena, E., Read, T., Martín-Monje, E., & Castrillo, M. D. (2014). Analysing student participation in Foreign Language MOOCs: A case study. In U. Cress & C. D. Kloos (Eds.), Proceedings of EMOOCs 2014: European MOOCs stakeholders summit (pp. 11–17). Open Education Europa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271137560_Analysing_student_participation_in_Foreign_Language_MOOCs_a_case_study
Blieck, Y., De Jong, M., & Vandeput, L. (2012). Blended learning for lifelong learners in a multicampus context (MuLLLti). Leuven University College, Belgium. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319016415_Blended_Learning_for_Lifelong_Learners_in_a_Multicampus_Context_MuLLLti
Bralić, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: Achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7
Castaño-Muñoz, J., & Rodrigues, M. (2021). Open to MOOCs? Evidence of their impact on labour market outcomes. Computers & Education, 173, Article 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104289
Chong, S. W., Khan, M. A., & Reinders, H. (2024). A critical review of design features of LMOOCs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2038632
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dhorne, L., Deflandre, J., Bernaert, O., Bianchi, S., & Thirouard, M. (2017). Mentoring learners in MOOCs: A new way to improve completion rates? In D. Kloos, C. Jermann, P. Pérez-Sanagustín, M. Seaton, & D. White (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 29–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_4
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf
Erbil, D. G. (2020). A review of flipped classroom and cooperative learning method within the context of Vygotsky theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 01157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157
Gao, X., Han, L., Liu, J., & Feng, F. (2020). Blended teaching practices for active learning in higher pharmacy education. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 55(3), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.55.3.137
Garrison, D. R. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Ho, N. T. T., & Le, H. V. (2024). Challenges and implications of blended learning adoption in the age of communication technology: A case study of Vietnamese universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. rEFLections, 31(3), 1144–1177. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i3.276777
Ho, N. T. T., Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Idrus, H. B., Sivapalan, S., Pham, H. H., Dinh, V. H., Pham, H. K., & Nguyen, L. T. M. (2023). Acceptance toward Coursera MOOCs blended learning: A mixed methods view of Vietnamese higher education stakeholders. Sage Open, 13(4), Article 1197997. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197997
Ho, N. T. T., Pham, H. H., Sivapalan, S., & Dinh, V. H. (2022). The adoption of blended learning using Coursera MOOCs: A case study in a Vietnamese higher education institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7671
Hoi, V. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners’ acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education, 146, Article 103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761
Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102–118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077803
Jebraeily, M., Pirnejad, H., Feizi, A., & Niazkhani, Z. (2020). Evaluation of blended medical education from lecturers’ and students’ viewpoint: A qualitative study in a developing country. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02388-8
Jha, P., & Naaz, I. (2020). Digital learning through MOOCs: Advantages, outcomes & challenges. Sambodhi, UGC CARE Journal, 43(4), 18–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348187317_Digital_learning_through_MOOCs_Advantages_Outcomes_Challenges
Kaygorodtseva, N., & Luzgina, V. (2019). Practical skills in AutoCAD through a Mass Open Online Course. In L. Cocchiarella (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference on geometry and graphics (pp. 3–7). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95588-9_143
Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Ahuja, N. J., Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended learning tools and practices: A comprehensive analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 85151–85197. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844
Le, H. V. (2025). Assessing student satisfaction with MOOCs: A comprehensive analysis of Coursera’s instructional design and learner experience. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2024-0159
Liu, W., Gao, X., Han, L., Liu, J., & Feng, F. (2021). Blended teaching practices for active learning in higher pharmacy education. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 55, 655–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-51141/v1
Lu, D. (2021). Students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment to promote critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 696845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696845
Luo, R., & Ye, Z. (2021). What makes a good-quality language MOOC? An empirical study of criteria to evaluate the quality of online language courses from learners’ perspectives. ReCALL, 33(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000082
Martín-Monje, E., & Borthwick, K. (2021). Researching massive open online courses for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 33(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000094
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Müller, C., Mildenberger, T., & Steingruber, D. (2023). Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: Why are some courses more effective than others? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x
Nguyen, L. Q. (2022). Learners’ satisfaction of courses on Coursera as a massive open online course platform: A case study. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1086170. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1086170
O’Connor, J., Ludgate, S., Le, Q. V., Le, H. T., & Huynh, P. D. P. (2023). Lessons from the pandemic: Teacher educators’ use of digital technologies and pedagogies in Vietnam before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, Article 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102942
Ossiannilsson, E. (2021). MOOCs for lifelong learning, equity, and liberation. In D. Cvetković (Ed.), MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) (pp. 1–18). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99659
Pham, H. H., & Ho, T. T. H. (2020).Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1823945
Purwasih, R., Rahimullaily, R., & Suryani, A. I. (2021). Blended learning model in improving 4C abilities of information system students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v10i4.30939
Rivas, M. J., Baker, R. B., & Evans, B. J. (2020). Do MOOCs make you more marketable? An experimental analysis of the value of MOOCs relative to traditional credentials and experience. AERA Open, 6(4), Article 973577. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420973577
Roqobih, F. D., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2019). Improving students’ creative thinking skills through blended learning using schoology. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1417(1), Article 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012094
Saber, H., Abdul Manaf, R., Basman, A. T., Sanip, S., Lee, P. Y., Kamalludeen, R., Ibrahim, R., & Amin-Nordin, S. (2022). Challenges and barriers of blended learning among Asian health sciences students: A pilot study. Education in Medicine Journal, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.1.1
Sallam, M. H., Martín-Monje, E., & Li, Y. (2022). Research trends in language MOOC studies: A systematic review of the published literature (2012-2018). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668
Sebbah, L. (2021). Assessment in blended learning: EFL students’ perceptions of continuous formative assessment in writing class. Aleph UCLA Undergraduate Research Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 291–312. https://aleph-alger2.edinum.org/4043
Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC? In E. Martin-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 16–32). http://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2
Sosa-Díaz, M. J., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2020). Massive open online courses (MOOC) within the framework of international developmental cooperation as a strategy to achieve sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310187
Tang, S. M., & Tien, H. N. (2020). Digital transformation trend in Vietnam higher education: Blended learning model. International Journal of Social Science and Economics Invention, 6(07), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.23958/ijssei/vol06-i07/218
Virani, S. R., Saini, J. R., & Sharma, S. (2023). Adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for blended learning: The Indian educators’ perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Springer Science & Business Media.
Yousef, A. M. F., & Sumner, T. (2021). Reflections on the last decade of MOOC research. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22334
