Genre-Based Analysis and Interactional Metadiscourse Analysis of the Unstructured Abstracts for Research Articles in Scopus-Indexed Q1 Journals: Experimental Abstracts on COVID-19
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstracts serve as a crucial medium of providing readers with succinct information extracted from research articles (RAs), and assisting academic authors in publicizing their research to the clinical and health science discourse community. However, the rhetorical move structure and the interactional metadiscourse categories (IMCs) of RA abstracts on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), one of the most threatening diseases in clinical and health science fields, remain underexplored. This study sought to investigate the move structure and the IMCs used in each move of the English RA abstracts on COVID-19. A corpus of 143 experimental unstructured abstracts was purposively compiled from international journals included in the Scopus database. The target journals were indexed in Quartile 1, as reported by Scimago Journal & Country Rank website in 2022. The coding scheme for the move analysis was adapted from those of Hyland (2000) plus Kanoksilapatham (2013), while the coding scheme for the IMC analysis was adapted from Hyland’s (2005a) interpersonalmodel. The findings revealed that the Result Move was often required while the Background, Methods, and Discussion Moves were conventionally used. The Purpose Move was found to be merely optional in the abstracts. Furthermore, the predominant IMCs discovered in each move of the experimental abstract genre may imply its own inherent nature, that is, how the authors exhibited their position and interaction. Taken together, the current study has important pedagogical implications for designing and developing guidelines for writing unstructured abstracts of experimental RAs.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abdollahpour, Z., & Gholami, J. (2018). Rhetorical structure of the abstracts of medical sciences research articles. La Prensa Medica Argentina, 104(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47275/0032-745X-114
Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical organization of tourism research article abstracts. Procedia: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 208, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.201511.203
Albert, T. (2000). The A-Z of medical writing. BMJ Books.
Alyousef, H. S. (2021). A move structure model for dentistry research article abstracts: A genre-based study of variations and similarities in eight dentistry subdisciplines. Discourse and Interaction, 14(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2021-1-25
Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384
Ashofteh, Z., Shirvan, M. E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2077–2096. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851035
Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T. A., (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins Publishing.
Bošnjak, B., Stein, S. C., Willenzon, S., Cordes, A., Puppe, W., Bernhardt, G., Ravens, I., Ritter, C., Schultze-Florey, C., Gödecke, N., Martens, J., Kleine-Weber, H., Hoffmann, M., Cossmann, A., Yılmaz, M., Pink, I., Hoeper, M. M., Behrens, G. M. N., Pöhlmann, S., . . . Förster, R. (2020). Low serum neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in mildly affected COVID-19 convalescent patients revealed by two different detection methods. Cellular & Molecular Immunology, 18(4), 936–944. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-00573-9
Breeze, R. (2009). Issues of persuasion in academic law abstracts. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.02
Conforti, A., Sanchez, E., Salvatori, E., Lione, L., Compagnone, M., Pinto, E., Palombo, F., D’Acunto, E., Muzi, A., Roscilli, G., Sun, Y., Viscount, B., Hayward, J. A., Shorrock, C., Diel, D. G., Impellizeri, J. A., & Aurisicchio, L. (2023). A linear DNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain elicits potent immune response and neutralizing antibodies in domestic cats. Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development, 28, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2022.12.015
Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.57
Fintelman-Rodrigues, N., Sacramento, C. Q., Lima, C. R., Souza-Silva, F., Ferreira, A. C., Mattos, M., De Freitas, C., Soares, V. C., Da Silva Gomes Dias, S., Temerozo, J. R., Miranda, M. D., Da Rocha Matos, A., Bozza, F. A., Carels, N., Alves, C. R., Siqueira, M. M., Bozza, P. T., & Souza, T. M. L. (2020). Atazanavir, alone or in combination with Ritonavir, inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and proinflammatory cytokine production.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 64(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00825-20
Ghasempour, B., & Farnia, M. (2017). Contrastive move analysis: Persian and English articles abstracts in law. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 5(4), 739–753. http://espeap.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/espeap/article/view/243/365
Good, S. S., Westover, J. B., Jung, K. H., Zhou, X., Moussa, A., La Colla, P., Collu, G., Canard, B., & Sommadossi, J. P. (2021). AT-527, a double prodrug of a guanosine nucleotide analog, is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and a promising oral antiviral for treatment of COVID-19. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 65(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02479-20
Graves, H., Moghaddasi, S., & Hashim, A. (2013). Mathematics is the method: Exploring the macro-organizational structure of research articles in mathematics. Discourse Studies, 15(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613482430
Green, R., Mayilsamy, K., McGill, A. R., Martinez, T., Chandran, B., Blair, L. J., Bickford, P. C., Mohapatra, S., & Mohapatra, S. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 infection increases the gene expression profile for Alzheimer’s disease risk. Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development, 27, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2022.09.007
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
Hwang, C. J., Nguyen, T.-H., & Su, T.-J. (2017). Move analysis for scientific abstract sections: A study of nanoscience and nanotechnology research article abstracts. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1), 19–22.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2013). Genre and discourse analysis in language for specific purposes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0452
Iyer, S. R., & Simkins, B. J. (2022). COVID-19 and the economy: Summary of research and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102801
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001
Jirapanakorn, N., Trakulkasemsuk, W., & Keyuravong, S. (2014). Move analysis of English research article introductions in Thai and international medical journals. rEFLections, 17, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v17i0.114201
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2009). Generic structure of research article abstracts in sciences. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 4, 95–111.https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/22067
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). In search of the generic identity of the discussion section: Three engineering sub-disciplines. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 4(2), 1–26.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013) Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1–10.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2014, 28–30 August). Structural organization of research article abstracts: Civil and biomedical engineering [Paper presentation]. The Sixth International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Well-Being, Siem Reap, Kingdom of Cambodia.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
Kuo, C., Chao, T., Kao, H., Tsai, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, L., Hsieh, M., Chang, S., & Liang, P. (2021). Kinetic characterization and inhibitor screening for the proteases leading to identification of drugs against SARS-CoV-2. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 65(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02577-20
Li, Q., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Research article abstracts in two subdisciplines of business—Move structure and hedging between management and marketing. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p52
Lieungnapar, A., & Watson Todd, R. (2011). Top-down versus bottom-up approaches toward move analysis in ESP. Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing Research in Applied Linguistics, 21–22. https://arts.kmutt.ac.th/dral/PDF%20proceedings%20on %20Web/1-10_Top-down_versus_Bottom- up_Approaches_toward_Move_Analysis _in_ESP.pdf
Martín, P., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., & Moreno, A. I. (2014). Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.001
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031
Merchante, N., Cárcel, S., Garrido‐Gracia, J. C., Trigo-Rodríguez, M., Moreno, M. Á. E., León‐López, R., Espíndola-Gómez, R., Alonso, E. A., García, D. V., Romero-Palacios, A., Pérez‐Camacho, I., Gutiérrez‐Gutiérrez, B., Martínez‐Marcos, F. J., Fernández-Roldán, C., Pérez-Crespo, P. M. M., Caño, A. A., León, E., Corzo, J. E., De La Fuente, C., & Torre‐Cisneros, J. (2022). Early use of Sarilumab in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and features of systemic inflammation: The SARICOR randomized clinical trial. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 66(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02107-21
Millar, N., Budgell, B., & Salager-Meyer, F. (2020). Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors’ perspectives. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.101 16/j.esp.2020.07.001
Nur, S., Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., & Ramadhan, S. (2021). Interacting with readers: How nonnative authors of English use meta-discourse markers in their research article abstracts published in English medium journals. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.14
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010
Rothenberger, S., Hurdiss, D. L., Walser, M., Malvezzi, F., Mayor, J., Ryter, S., Moreno, H., Liechti, N., Bosshart, A., Iss, C., Calabro, V., Cornelius, A., Hospodarsch, T., Neculcea, A., Looser, T., Schlegel, A., Fontaine, S., Villemagne, D., Paladino, M. E., . . . Trimpert, J. (2022). The trispecific DARPin ensovibep inhibits diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nature Biotechnology, 40(12), 1845–1854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01382-3
Rungnaphawet, R. (2016). Moves, move sequences, and move cycling in computer engineering and electrical engineering research article abstracts. Pasaa Paritat Journal, 31, 107–140.
Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in environmental science and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p81
Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365
SCImago. (n.d.). SJR —SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com
Suntara, W. (2018). Linguistic realisations of rhetorical structure in research articles abstracts: An analysis based on food technology. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 26(3), 1283–1300.
Suntara, W., & Chokthawikit, S. (2018). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts: An analysis from public health journals. Language and Linguistics, 36(Special Issue), 31–52.
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p84
Swales, J. M. (1990). English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Vathanalaoha, K. (2017). Genre analysis and transitivity analysis of dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals [Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://doi.org/10.14457/TU.the.2017.738
Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Genre analysis of experiment-based dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. 3L the Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2018-2403-01
Wang, J., & Jiang, F. (2018). Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing: Hedges, boosters and self-mentions across disciplines and writer groups. In M.-D. Pilar & S. Jolanta (Eds.), Intercultural perspectives on research writing (pp. 195–216). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan
Ward, B. J., Gobeil, P., Séguin, A., Atkins, J., Boulay, I., Charbonneau, P., Couture, M., D’Aoust, M., Dhaliwall, J., Finkle, C., Hager, K., Mahmood, A., Makarkov, A., Cheng, M. P., Pillet, S., Schimke, P., St-Martin, S., Trépanier, S., & Landry, N. (2021). Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01370-1
Wei, J., & Duan, J. (2019). A comparative study of metadiscoursal features in English research article abstracts in hard disciplines. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 1–37. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1217060.pdf
Woolsey, C., Borisevich, V., Prasad, A. N., Agans, K. N., Deer, D. J., Dobias, N. S., Heymann, J. C., Foster, S. L., Levine, C. B., Medina, L., Melody, K., Geisbert, J. B., Fenton, K. A., Geisbert, T. W., & Cross, R. W. (2020). Establishment of an African green monkey model for COVID-19 and protection against re-infection. Nature Immunology, 22(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00835-8
Wu, G., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 10(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10.2.28557
Wu, X., Li, N., Wang, G., Liu, W., Yu, J., Cao, G., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ma, J., Wu, J., Yang, H., Mao, X., He, J., Yu, Y., Qiu, C., Li, N., Yao, S., Feng, H., Yan, J., . . . Zhang, J. (2021). Tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of a novel SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody, etesevimab, in Chinese healthy adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human phase 1 study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 65(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00350-21
Yeboah, H., & Yaya, S. (2023). Health and economic implications of the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on women and children in Africa. Reproductive Health, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01616-w
Zhang, P., & Pan, Y. (2023). An intercultural comparison of authors’ self-mention and identity construction in English agricultural abstracts by Chinese and international writers. Journal of Contemporary Language Research, 2(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.58803/jclr.v2i2.69
Zhang, X., Han, P., Wang, H., Xu, Y., Li, F., Li, M., Fan, L., Zhang, H., Dai, Q., Lin, H., Qi, X., Liang, J., Wang, X., & Yang, X. (2021). Engineering mesenchymal stromal cells with neutralizing and anti-inflammatory capability against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development, 21, 754–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.05.004
Zibalas, D., & Šinkūnienė, J. (2019). Rhetorical structure of promotional genres: The case of research article and conference abstracts. Discourse and Interaction, 12(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.5817/di2019-2-95
