Assessing Learner Engagement beyond the Classroom with Snapshots
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, research on engagement in learning and its potential impact on language learning has gained significant attention. Various methodological approaches exist, including student self-reports, observations, experience sampling, and interviews, each with its own strengths and limitations. The feasibility of each approach varies depending on the type of engagement data to be collected (e.g., descriptive or inferential). Student self-reporting is a common method for collecting descriptive and detailed engagement data based on learners’ perceptions. However, this approach often relies on records like learning activity logs, which can lead to vague memories and superficial records. To address this issue, the present study investigates the potential of using smartphone snapshots taken by learners to capture specific instances of their out-of-classroom learning. Snapshots offer a more immediate and context-rich way to capture learning experiences as they occur, helping to overcome limitations of memory-dependent self-reports. Seven university students from a private university in Japan participated in photographing their out-of-class learning activities over a six-month period. After taking the snapshots, they reflected on their out-of-class learning through semi-structured interviews once every two months. Combining multiple methods may be desirable to complement the shortcomings of individual approaches. The photos were visually analyzed, and the interview data underwent thematic analysis. The findings revealed that snapshots are an effective means of recording specific learning experiences and enhance memory recall in a context-rich and detailed manner. Furthermore, by combining snapshots with semi-structured interviews, learners were able to deepen their understanding of multi-dimensional autonomous learner engagement beyond the classroom.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Engagement with the language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–239). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45
Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (2011). Beyond the language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790
Bonner, E., Garvey, K., Miner, M., Godin, S., & Reinders, H. (2023). Measuring real-time learner engagement in the Japanese EFL classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.2025379
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813349
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (2020). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/HIVER3606
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Lai, C. (2015). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: Accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.918982
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001
Liu, S. (2019). A multimodal discourse analysis of the interactive meaning in public service advertisement. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 10, 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v10i0.8196
Lu, M. (2022). A review of the idiodynamic method as an emerging research method for the investigation of affective variables in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1002611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002611
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2021). The idiodynamic method: Willingness to communicate and anxiety processes interacting in real time. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0024
Nguyen, V., & Stracke, E. (2021). Learning experiences in and outside class by successful Vietnamese tertiary students studying English as a foreign language. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1801692
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128
Phung, L., Nakamura, S., & Reinders, H. (2020). The effect of choice on affective engagement: Implications for task design. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 163–181). Multilingual Matters.
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Reinders, H. (2020). A framework for learning beyond the classroom. In M. Raya & F. Vieira (Eds.), Autonomy in language education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 63–73). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261336
Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–-578. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000192
Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
Zhou, S. A., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 75–98). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/HIVER3606