Integrating Generative AI in EFL Academic Writing: Thai English-Major Students’ Purposes, Perceptions, and Experiences with ChatGPT

Main Article Content

Natparan Tanharat
Parichart Phootirat

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, is fundamentally transforming EFL academic writing. Although AI-mediated writing has been widely researched, empirical studies within the Thai higher education context remain limited. To address this gap, the present mixed-methods study conceptualizes ChatGPT not only as software but also through the lens of Sociocultural Theory (SCT) as a mediated tool that can provide cognitive scaffolding. The study examined the purposes, perceptions, and experiences of 50 Thai senior English-major undergraduates who used ChatGPT as a writing assistant. The data from structured questionnaires and scenario-based interviews indicate that students primarily use the tool for self-regulation, specifically for paraphrasing, idea generation, and coherence enhancement. However, their adoption is discerning rather than uncritical. Participants valued the tool’s accessibility but remained cautious about ethical concerns, particularly plagiarism and the reliability of information. Importantly, despite AI’s efficiency, human feedback remains the essential form of “other-regulation” necessary for developing advanced writing proficiency. These findings suggest that educators should aim for a pedagogical balance that integrates technological resources with human guidance, offering clear implications for curriculum design and academic integrity in an AI-mediated era.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tanharat, N., & Phootirat, P. (2025). Integrating Generative AI in EFL Academic Writing: Thai English-Major Students’ Purposes, Perceptions, and Experiences with ChatGPT. rEFLections, 32(3), 1891–1916. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i3.285982
Section
Research articles

References

Ahmed, A. (2010). The EFL essay writing difficulties of Egyptian student teachers of English: Implications for essay writing curriculum and instruction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://search.proquest.com/openview/62d9401ebb5def53fc513cbc58aac58d/1.pdf

Algaraady, J., & Mahyoob, M. (2023). ChatGPT’s capabilities in spotting and analyzing writing errors experienced by EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 9, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 7(2), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1387

Bhowmik, S. (2021). Writing instruction in an EFL context: Learning to write or writing to learn language? BELTA Journal, 5(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.36832/beltaj.2021.0501.03

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M., Conboy, K., Duan, Y., Edwards, J., Mäntymäki, M., Janssen, M., Kim, Y., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I. O., … Wirtz, J. (2023). The evolving role of generative AI in academia: Opportunities, challenges, and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essays. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069

Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. The Social Science Journal, 28(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-M

Gasaymeh, A. M., Alomoush, O. I., Almomani, M. S., & Al-Taamneh, M. A. (2025). Exploring education students’ use of ChatGPT for personal and academic purposes. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1580310. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1580310

Gill, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2023). ChatGPT: Vision and challenges. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004

Grammarly, Inc. (2025). Grammarly (Version 1.146.3.0) [Large language model]. https://www.grammarly.com

Google. (2025). Google trends: Search interest over time for “ChatGPT”, “Grammarly”, “Quillbot”, and “LaMDA” (August 2024–May 2025) [Data set]. Google Trends. https://trends.google.com

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1

Kittivorawut, O., Charungchit, P., Krataithong, S., Dhanarattigannon, J., & Getz, J. L. (2023). Perception and use of QuillBot as a digital tool in academic writing among undergraduate students. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Liberal Arts, 8-13. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NJL9eoTTVJHZHS4-_3YT_1j9cR0w5pTi/view

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3), Article ej107int. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int

Koubaa, A., Boulila, W., Ghouti, L., Alzahem, A., & Latif, S. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT capabilities and limitations: A critical review of the NLP game changer. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0438.v1

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bossu, C., Charitonos, K., Coughlan, T., Deacon, A., Deane, N., Ferguson, R., Herodotou, C., Huang, C.-W., Mayisela, T., Rets, I., Sargent, J., Scanlon, E., Small, J., Walji, S., Weller, M., & Whitelock, D. (2023). Innovating pedagogy 2023. The Open University. https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/?p=784

Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Li, L. (2020). Language teacher cognition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51134-8

Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5

Marzuki, M., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, W., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Meniado, J., Huyen, D. T. T., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313

Ministry of Education. (2014). Guidelines for the implementation of the Ministry of Education policy on reform of teaching and learning English. Office of the Basic Education Commission. https://academic.obec.go.th/download/obec_book_teacher/basic_education_core_curriculum/051-024%20_Nayobai%20Kan%20Patirup%20Kan%20Rian%20Kan%20Son%20Phasa%20Angkrit.pdf

Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2023). Transforming education through technology (EdTech Masterplan 2030). https://www.moe.gov.sg/education-in-sg/educational-technology-journey/edtech-masterplan

Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI). (2022). Thailand national AI strategy and action plan (2022–2027). National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).

Mohammed, A., Al-Ghazali, A., & Alqohfa, K. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT uses in higher studies. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i2.55

Puspitasari, E., & Tsara, E. (2022). Learning tools for EFL writing: What and how based on upper secondary school students’ perspectives. VELES, 6(2), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.5878

Rattanadilok Na Phuket, P., & Othman, A. P. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99–106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083531

Ray, P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are automated paraphrasing tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w

Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A review of AI-powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035

Russell Group. (2023). Principles for the use of generative AI in education. Russell Group Universities.

Seensangworn, P. (2017). Writing problems and writing strategies of English major and non-English major students in a Thai university. Manutsat Paritat: Journal of Humanities, 39(1), 113–136.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587400

Suraprajit, P. (2021). An analysis of errors in English essays written by Thai non-English major students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.02

Tai, A., Meyer, M., Varidel, M., Prodan, A., Vogel, M., Iorfino, F., & Krausz, R. M. (2023). Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), 16–30. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/903

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2023). Assessment reform for the age of artificial intelligence. Australian Government. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/assessment-reform-age-artificial-intelligence

Turková, K., Krásničan, V., Prázová, I., Turčínek, P., & Foltýnek, T. (2025). Adapting to the future: The use of AI tools and applications in university education and a call for transparent rules and guidelines. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 21, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00203-9

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Longman.

Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6341–6359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

Zamel, V. (1976). Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585940

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647

Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418