Using Service-Learning as Experiential Learning in EFL Classrooms: Fostering Global Citizenship in the Thai Context

Main Article Content

Prathana Siwathaworn
Jaruda Rajani Na Ayuthaya

Abstract

This study explores how service-learning, conceptualised as an experiential learning approach, fosters global citizenship among students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms in Thailand. Guided by Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory and UNESCO’s (2015) Global Citizenship Education (GCED) framework, the study adopted a qualitative design to analyse students’ reflections, interviews, and artefacts from two course-based service-learning projects: the Kids Asa Project and the GC-based Mini English Lesson for the Blind. The latter required students to collaboratively design inclusive English lessons for visually impaired learners by integrating GCED principles such as empathy, inclusion, and respect for diversity into their pedagogical decisions. Findings reveal that service-learning fostered students’ development across the cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioural dimensions of GCED. Cognitively, students reconceptualised English as an inclusive communicative practice rather than a system focused solely on linguistic accuracy. Socio-emotionally, sustained interaction with blind learners promoted empathy, respect, and heightened self–other awareness. Behaviourally, students enacted these understandings through inclusive pedagogical design and expressed a growing sense of responsibility and civic engagement. Overall, the study illustrates how global citizenship was experienced not as an abstract or idealised concept but as a lived and locally grounded practice enacted through small-scale actions. By highlighting both the pedagogical possibilities and practical constraints of service-learning in EFL contexts, this study offers a nuanced and attainable conceptualisation of GCED in language education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siwathaworn, P., & Rajani Na Ayuthaya, J. (2026). Using Service-Learning as Experiential Learning in EFL Classrooms: Fostering Global Citizenship in the Thai Context. rEFLections, 33(1), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v33i1.288741
Section
Research articles

References

Adarlo, G. M. (2020). Service-learning as global citizenship education: Acting locally on global challenges and concerns. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(3), 7–23.

Ayuthaya, J. R. N. (2018). Intercultural communication-based lessons through songs: Effects on the intercultural competence development of Thai tertiary students. rEFLections, 25(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v25i1.136264

Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431

Boonyaprakob, K. (2019). การเรียนรู้ผ่านการบริการ: แนวทางการพัฒนาการเรียนรู้เชิงพหุวัฒนธรรมในมหาวิทยาลัยไทย [Service-learning: A pathway to multicultural learning in Thai universities]. Journal of Education Studies, 47(1), 23–45.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bringle, R. G., & Clayton, P. H. (2022). Service-learning research primer. Campus Compact.

Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2009). Innovative practices in service-learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 147, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.356

Coquyt, M. (2020). The effects of service-learning on the moral development of students. The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and Learning, 1(1), Article 2. https://red.mnstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=ijgll

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Darby, A., Willingham, L., & Cobb, T. (2023). Examining community partners’ perspectives on reciprocity and co-education. Journal of Service-Learning in Higher Education, 16, 167–179.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (4th ed.). Routledge.

Duarte, I., Guillén-Diaz, C., & Calderón-Quindós, P. (2024). Service learning for linguistic and cultural diversity in higher education: Proposals for pre-service language teacher education. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 6(2), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc.v6i2.1321

Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass.

Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734347

Hill, M., Walkington, H., & France, D. (2016). Graduate attributes: Implications for higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1154932

Hughes, C. (2020). Operationalising global citizenship education: The universal learning programme. L’éducation En débats: Analyse comparée, 10(1), 122–138.

Jacoby, B. (2015). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. Jossey-Bass.

Kachru, B. B. (1999). World Englishes and culture wars. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

Kasetsart University. (2020). รายงานการประเมินคุณภาพบัณฑิตระดับปริญญาตรี [Employer quality assessment report]. https://web.planning.ku.ac.th/Download/employer62.pdf

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kramsch, C. (2023). Language as symbolic power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009277557

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2007). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

Maravé-Vivas, M., Gil-Gómez, J., Valverde-Esteve, T., Salvador-Garcia, C., & Chiva-Bartoll, O. (2022). A longitudinal study of the effects of service-learning on physical education teacher education students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 787346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787346

Matsuda, A. (2012). Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.

https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697042

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education. (2023). Education strategic plan 2023–2027. Office of the Education Council.

Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the tensions of service-learning in higher

education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(2), 50–61.

Mtawa, N. N. (2020). Service-learning as a higher education pedagogy for citizenship, conscientization and civic agency. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.18216

National Strategy Committee. (2018). Thailand 20-year national strategy (2018–2037). Office of the Prime Minister.

O’Connor, K., Lynch, K., & Owen, D. (2011). Student-community engagement and the development of graduate attributes. Education + Training, 53(2/3), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911111115654

Oxfam. (2015). Education for global citizenship: A guide for schools. Oxfam GB.

Perren, J., & Wurr, A. J. (2015). Learning the language of global citizenship: Strengthening service-learning in TESOL. Common Ground.

Pinto, J. C., & Costa-Ramalho, S. (2023). Effects of service-learning as opposed to traditional teaching-learning contexts: A pilot study with three different courses. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1185469. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1185469

Rauschert, P., & Byram, M. (2014). Intercultural service learning in foreign language education. Language Learning Journal, 42(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.918141

Sun, Y.-C., & Yang, F.-Y. (2015). I help, therefore I learn: Service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818555

Tarrant, M. (2010). Social identity and the development of empathy in young people. Journal of Moral Education, 39(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2010.521378

Tomalin, B., & Stempleski, S. (2013). Cultural awareness. Oxford University Press.

Tonkin, H. (2017). Service-learning across cultures: Promise and achievement. In H. E. Fitzgerald, C. Burack, & S. D. Seifer (Eds.), Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions (Vol. 2, pp. 503–518). Michigan State University Press.

UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. UNESCO.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1

University of Adelaide. (2024). Graduate attributes. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/learning/resources-for-educators/graduate-attributes

University of New England. (2024). Graduate attributes. https://www.une.edu.au/current-students/graduation/graduate-attributes

Vikannda, K. (2016). คุณลักษณะของแรงงานที่พึงประสงค์สำหรับอุตสาหกรรมท่องเที่ยวและบริการ [Desired worker characteristics for the tourism and service industry]. Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University Journal, 8(1), 45–60.

Weerasombat, K., & Pumipatyothin, C. (2024). Employers’ priority on work skills and the skill gaps: A case of Thailand. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2441656. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2441656

Wongwanich, S. (2020). การมีส่วนร่วมของมหาวิทยาลัยไทยในชุมชน: จากจิตอาสาสู่การเรียนรู้ผ่านการบริการ [Thai universities’ community engagement: From volunteerism to service-learning]. Journal of Education Administration, 14(2), 33–50.

World Bank. (2010, January 22). Quality education a major concern in Thailand, says new World Bank study [Press release]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2010/01/22/quality-education-majorconcern-thailand-says-new-world-bank-study