Expressive-initiated Storytelling by Jesus in the Gospel of Luke in English Translation: Re-visiting the Narrative Criticism

Main Article Content

Pattrawut Charoenroop

Abstract

Although Kurz (1993) laid the theoretical foundation for narrative criticism, his analysis of the Gospel of Luke remains at the macro-narrative level, focusing on literary techniques across the Gospel as a whole. By contrast, this present study investigates conflict-driven narrative situations, examining scenarios in which Jesus’ storytelling is used in response to accusations, complaints, and criticism. The data consist of nineteen biblical narratives from the Gospel of Luke in English translation in which Jesus responds to expressive speech acts. The conceptual framework on narrative criticism, grounded in structuralist narratology, reveals multilayered communicative intentions, and, consequently, offers comprehensive interpretations of why Jesus, as the speaker of the parables, responds to expressive speech acts. The results show that most conflict-driven storytelling conveys moral instruction through the illocutionary force of directives aimed at inviting the hearer, the immediate audience, to commit to future actions. Evident in most parables with incomplete story elements, Jesus’ responses present narrative gaps that invite not only the immediate audience but also the actual reader to interpret moral lessons from the scriptural text. Intertextuality, which provides narrative echoes to Old Testament stories, appears infrequently when Jesus addresses accusations, complaints, and criticism. In response to these face-threatening acts, parables characterized by narrative gaps without intertextuality are frequently employed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Charoenroop, P. (2026). Expressive-initiated Storytelling by Jesus in the Gospel of Luke in English Translation: Re-visiting the Narrative Criticism. rEFLections, 33(1), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v33i1.288971
Section
Research articles

References

Akpan, A. M. (2018). Evaluation of Pentecostal interpretations of Matthew 25:14–30 in the light of reformed hermeneutics [Master’s thesis, Northwest University]. NWU Repository. https://repository.nwu.ac.za/home

Bennema, C. (2009). A theory of character in the Fourth Gospel with reference to ancient and modern literature. Biblical Interpretation, 17(4), 375–421. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851508x329700

Booker, C. (2004). The seven basic plots: Why we tell stories. Continuum.

Booth, F. L. (2005). The New Testament. Parables of Jesus. https://www.padfield.com/acrobat/booth/NT-Y1-Q4.pdf

Boxer, D. (1993). Complaints as positive strategies: What the learner needs to know. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2), 277−299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587147

Brown, J. K. (2020). The Gospels as stories: A narrative approach to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Baker Academic.

Craiker, K. N. (2022, April 10). Story elements: 7 main elements of a story and 5 elements of plot. ProWritingAid. https://prowritingaid.com/story-elements

Cuany, M. (2017). Jesus, Barabbas and the people: The climax of Luke’s trial narrative and Lukan Christology (Luke 23.13−25). Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 39(4), 441−458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X17704601

Dawson, P., & Mäkelä, M. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge companion to narrative theory. Routledge.

Debray, C., & Spencer-Oatey, H. (2022). Co-constructing good relations through troubles talk in diverse teams Journal of Pragmatics, 192, 85−97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.006

El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of students’ complaints and professors’ responses to complaints: A case study of an Egyptian private university. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10, 2252634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2252634

Hagan, H. (2019). Basic plots in the Bible: A literacy approach to genre. Journal of Bible and Culture, 49(4), 198−213.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107919877640

Hobyane, R. S. (2024). The pragmatic nature of focalisation in John 4:1–42: Reading John as a performative text. Verbum et Ecclesia, 45(1), Article 3067. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.3067

Kauffeld, F. J. (1998). Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation, 12(2), 245−266. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007704116379

Krol, P. (2023, February 24). The parables of Jesus: Revealing the secrets of God’s Kingdom. Logos. https://www.logos.com/grow/nook-parables-of-jesus/

Kurz, W. S. (1993). Reading Luke-Acts: Dynamics of biblical narrative. Westminster John Knox Press.

Mead, G. (2013). Coming home to story: Storytelling beyond happily ever after. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Miller, E. (2011). Theories of story and storytelling. Storytelling and Video Conferencing. https://storytellingandvideoconferencing.com/67.pdf

Morgan, J. M. (2013). Emplotment, plot and explotment: Refining plot analysis of biblical narratives from the reader’s perspective. Biblical Interpretation, 21(1), 64−98. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-1041A0004

Nasheeda, A., Abdullah, H. B., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmed, N. B. (2019). Transforming transcripts into stories: A multimethod approach to narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919856797

Nguyen, T. (2005). Criticizing and responding to criticism in a foreign language: A study of Vietnamese learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Auckland.

Phelan, J. (2005). Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Cornell University Press.

Polanyi, L. (1982). Linguistic and social constraints on storytelling. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5−6), 509−524. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90023-6

Resseguie, J. L. (2005). Narrative criticism of the New Testament: An introduction. Baker Academic.

Saltmarshe, E. (2018, February 20). Using story to change systems. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/using_story_to_change_systems

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1−23.

Smith, B. H. (1980). Narrative version, narrative theories. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 213−236. https://doi.org/10.1086/448097

Snodgrass, K. R. (2018). Stories with intent: A comprehensive guide to the parables of Jesus (2nd ed.). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Ta, B. T., & Filipi, A. (2020). Storytelling as a resource for pursuing understanding and agreement in doctoral research supervision meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 165, 4−17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.008

Van Hulle, D. (Ed.). (2024). Genetic narratology: Analysing narrative across versions. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0426

Wheatley, P. D. (2023). The ritual bridge between narrative and performance in the Gospel of Mark. Religions, 14(9), Article 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091104