Exploring Sarcastic English Utterances in English in ‘Gilmore Girls’ TV Series Season 2

Main Article Content

Jutatip Luechai
Sakunrat Worathamrong

Abstract

Sarcasm is inherently embedded in everyday communication, often going unnoticed, as its use shifts fluidly across different contexts. This study explored sarcastic utterances in English, focusing on sarcastic types and strategies in various relationship contexts. Adopting a mixed-method approach, the research categorized sarcasm into explicit and implicit types, examining seven strategies: incongruity, explicitation, reasoning, metonymy, metaphor, rhetorical question, and echoing (shift of focus), adapting from Tabacaru’s taxonomy of sarcastic English utterances (2017). Gilmore Girls TV series (Season 2) was selected to analyze sarcastic types and utterances occurred in close-symmetrical, close-asymmetrical, distant-symmetrical, and distant-asymmetrical relationship contexts. The findings revealed that explicit sarcasm accounted for 51% while implicit sarcasm accounted for 49%. Among these, 33% involved incongruity, 24% rhetorical question, 19% metonymy, 15% explicitation, 6% echoing, 3% reasoning, and 0% metaphor. It appears that the use of sarcastic utterances is dynamic. It depends on relationship contexts, with explicit sarcasm is more common in close or high-power relationships to signal solidarity or assertiveness, while implicit forms dominate distant or hierarchical contexts to maintain politeness and face. Notably, sarcasm also emerged as a subtle resistance tool among lower-power speakers. The study highlights sarcasm as a context-dependent communicative tool which is salient across diverse interpersonal communication settings.

Article Details

How to Cite
Luechai, J., & Worathamrong, S. (2026). Exploring Sarcastic English Utterances in English in ‘Gilmore Girls’ TV Series Season 2. rEFLections, 33(2), 1066–1090. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v33i2.291900
Section
Research articles

References

Bennett, M. J. (2023). The relational roots of intercultural communication. In J. Baumann Montecinos, T. Grünfelder, & J. Wieland (Eds.), A relational view on Cultural complexity: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27454-1_2

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Caucci, G. M., Kreuz, R. J., & Buder, E. H. (2024). What's a little sarcasm between friends: Exploring the sarcastic tone of voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 43(4), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X241233001

D’Arcey, J. T., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2022). Oh, SO sarcastic: Diverse strategies for being sarcastic. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(3), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221081735

Fanari, R., Melogno, S., & Fadda, R. (2023). An experimental study on sarcasm comprehension in school children: The possible role of contextual, linguistics and meta-representative factors. Brain Sciences, 13(6), Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060863

Genovese, H. (2020). [Review of the book Gilmore Girls: A cultural history, by L. Stache & R. Davidson]. Journal of Popular Culture, 53(4), 973–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12936

George, T. (2022, October 25). Mixed methods research: Definition, guide, & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/mixed-methods/

Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS151&2_2

Goddard, C., & Levisen, C. (2023). Contrastive metapragmatics and the shifting semantics of ‘sarcasm’ in English and Danish. Contrastive Pragmatics, 1(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10107

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387

Gutierrez, W. (2023, February 17). The legacy of classic films: Why old movies still matter today. Enochs Eagle Eye.

https://enochseagleeye.org/2988/showcase/the-legacy-of-classic-films-why-old-movies-stillmatter-today/

Helal, N. A., Hassan, A., Badr, N. L., & Afify, Y. M. (2024). A contextual-based approach for sarcasm detection. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 15415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65217-8

Huang, L., & Galinsky, A. D. (2023). SHARP wit: Why receiving sarcasm improves perspective-taking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54, Article 101709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101709

Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Madden, C. (2024, June 9). Every season of Gilmore Girls, ranked. SlashFilm. https://www.slashfilm.com/1598997/gilmore-girls-every-season-ranked/

McAuley, L., & Glenwright, M. (2025). Humor styles predict self-reported sarcasm use in interpersonal communication. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), Article 922. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/7/922

McCann, E. (2025). From Emily to Loralei to Rory: A qualitative textual analysis of scripts from Gilmore Girls for real-world application (Thesis No. 7135) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota]. UND Scholarly Commons. https://commons.und.edu/theses/7135/

Mesing, J., Williams, D., & Blasko, D. (2012). Sarcasm in relationships: Hurtful or humorous? International Journal of Psychology, 47(Suppl. 1), 724. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.709129

Pexman, P. M. (2018). How do we understand sarcasm?. Frontiers for Young Minds, 6, Article 56. https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2018.00056#

Rothermich, K., Ogunlana, A., & Jaworska, N. (2021). Change in humor and sarcasm use based on anxiety and depression symptom severity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 140, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.027

Sidelinger, R. J., & Madlock, P. E. (2021). Humor at work: Exploring supervisors’ sarcasm, self-disparaging and vulgar language based humor, and verbal aggression. Communication Research Reports, 38(5), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1963697

Song, S. (2011). Metaphor and metonymy—A tentative research into modern cognitive linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.1.68-73

Tabacaru, S. (2017). When language bites: A corpus-based taxonomy of sarcastic utterances in American television series. Pragmatics & Cognition, 24(2), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17027.tab

Time. (2007, September 6). All-TIME 100 TV shows. https://time.com/collection/all-time-100-tv-shows/

Wieslander, M. (2021). Challenging and destabilizing official discourses: Irony as a resistance resource in institutional talk. Culture and Organization, 27(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1699093

Zhu, N., & Filik, R. (2024). The role of social status in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from the United Kingdom and China. Discourse Processes, 61(1–2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2252695

Zhu, N., & Wang, Z. (2020). The paradox of sarcasm: Theory of mind and sarcasm use in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, Article 110035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110035