Silence in an EFL Classroom: The Interplay of Schwab’s Four Commonplaces

Main Article Content

Chantarath Hongboontri
Ittiphat Wittaya
Kornsiri Booyaprakob

Abstract

       This qualitative research aims to seek causes for silence in an English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom.  To do so, the researchers went to one university in Thailand, and then interviewed and observed 10 students who enrolled in the Fundamental University English I course and consented to participate in the study.  An analysis of the transcribed data helped the researchers identify four possible causes for silence in this particular EFL classroom.  They were: (1) the EFL teacher, (2) the students themselves and their classmates, (3) the teaching material and its content, and (4) the classroom environment.  More importantly, these four commonplaces appeared to be entwined.   That is, the less friendly the student participants felt their teacher and their classmates were, the less the students enjoyed their English class; the more pressured the classroom environment was; the more the students would be silent, and vice versa. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Abhasakun, T. (2021). What’s Causing Thailand’s Poor English Language Proficiency? GLOBE: Lines of Thought across Southeast Asia. [Online]. Available: https://southeastasiaglobe.com/thailand-english-teaching/

Akkakoson, S. (2016). Speaking Anxiety in English Conversation Classrooms Among Thai Students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 13: 63-82. DOI: 10.32890/mjli2016.13.1.4

Banks, S. (2016). Behind Japanese Students’ Silence in English Classroom. Accents Asia. 8(2): 54-75. [Online]. Available: issues.accentsasia.org/issues/8-2/banks.pdf

Block, D. (2006). Identity in Applied Linguistics. In T. Omoniyi, & G. White (Eds.). The Sociolinguistics of identity (pp. 34-49). London: Continuum.

Boonyaprakob, K., Puntai, W., & Ponata, W. (2015). A Study of Upper-Secondary School EFL Students’ Anxiety in English Language Classroom. In Proceeding of The International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education. (pp 87-100). [Online]. Available: icsai.org/procarch/2icllce/2icllce-103.pdf

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as A Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9(2): 27-40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum. 41(5): 545-547. DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Chaiyong, S. (2019). Not Making the Grade, Bangkok Post. [Online]. Available: https://www.bangkokpost.com/life/social-and-lifestyle/1806584/not-making-the-grade

Chinpakdee, M. (2015). Thai EFL University Students’ Perspectives on Foreign Language Anxiety. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts. 15(3): 61-90. [Online]. Available: https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hasss/article/view/44672/37025

Commeyras, M. (1995). What Can We Learn from Students’ Questions? Theory into Practice. 43(2): 101-106. DOI: org/10.1080/00405849509543666

Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, And Change in Education. Educational Researcher. 31(4): 3-14. DOI:10.3102/0013189X031004003.

Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, Presence, And Power: “Student Voice” In Educational Research and Reform. Curriculum Inquiry. 36(4): 359-390. DOI: org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student Voice Across Contexts: Fostering Student Agency in Today’s Schools. Theory into Practice. 59(2): 182-191. DOI: org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091.

Cruddas, L., & Haddock, L. (2003). Girls’ Voices: Supporting Girls’ Learning and Emotional Development. Stratfordhire, England: Trentham Books.

Dahl, K. (1995). Challenges in Understanding the Learner’s Perspective. Theory into Practice. 43(2): 124-130. [Online]. Available: www.jstor.org/stable/1476961

De Villiers, C. Dumay, J., & Maroun, W. (2019). Qualitative Accounting Research: Dispelling Myths and Developing a New Research Agenda. Accounting & Finance. 59(3): 1459-1487. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12487

DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured Interviewing in Primary Care Research: A Balance of Relationship and Rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health. 7: 1-8. DOI: orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-3358

Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children. Harvard Educational Review. 58(3): 280–298. DOI:10.17763/HAER.58.3.C43481778R528QW4

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Duangsaeng, W. (2019). Queer Students and Their EFL Classrooms: Revealing What Goes on Beyond the Closed Door. In Proceedings of the STOU National Conference – Quality, Equality and Diversity in the Liberal Arts (pp 404-417). Sukothai Thammathirat Open University: Bangkok, Thailand.

Eisner, E. W. (2017). The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and The Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A Hands-On Guide to Doing Content Analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 7: 93-99. DOI: org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

Ferguson, D. L., Hanreddy, A., & Draxton, S. (2011). Giving Students Voice as A Strategy for Improving Teacher Practice. London Review of Education. 9(1): 55-70. DOI: 10.1080/14748460.2011.550435

Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic Listening/Speaking Tasks for ESL Students: Problems, Suggestions and Implications. TESOL Quarterly. 30(2): 297-320. DOI: org/10.2307/3588145

Fielding, M. (2004). “New wave” Student Voice and The Renewal of Civic Society. London Review of Education. 2(3): 197-217. DOI: 10.1080/1474846042000302834

Goldman, G., & Newman, J. B. (1998). Empowering Students to Transform Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hanh, N. T. (2020). Silence Is Gold?: A Study On Students’ Silence in EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Higher Education. 9(4): 153-160. DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p153

Hargreaves, A. (1996). Revisiting Voice. Educational Researcher. 25(10): 12-19. DOI: org/10.3102/0013189X025001012

Harumi, S. (2011). Classroom Silence: Voices from Japanese EFL Learners. ELT Journal. 65(3): 260-269. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccq046

Harumi, S. (2001). The Use of Silence by Japanese EFL Learners. In Proceeding of the InternationalConferenceCentreKitakyushu JAPAN (pp 27-34). [Online]. Available: https://jalt-publications.org/archive/proceedings/2001/027.pdf

Havik, T., & Westergård, E. (2020). Do Teachers Matter? Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Interactions and Student Engagement. Scandinavian Journal Educational Research. 64(4): 488-507. doi:10.1080/00313831.2019.1577754

Hongboontri, C., & Chen, W. (2021). Effective EFL Teachers: Revealing Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. KOREA TESOL. 17(1): In press.

Hongboontri, C., & Darling, W. E. (2020). EFL Curriculum Implementation: An Exploratory Study into Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research. 2(1): 69-86. DOI: 10.37534/bp.jhssr.2020.v2.n1.id1015.p69

Hongboontri, C., & Jantayasakorn, M. (2016). Cultures Of Teaching: Mapping the Teacher Professional Development Terrain. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 24(3): 1121-1145.

Hongboontri, C., & Noipinit, N. (2014). Practical Curriculum Inquiry: Students’ Voices of Their EFL Curriculum and Instruction. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 39(11): 65-81. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n11.5

Hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

Humphries, S., & Burns, A. (2015a). ‘In Reality It’s Almost Impossible’: CLT-Oriented Curriculum Change. English Language Teaching. 69(3): 239-248. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccu081

Humphries, S. C., Burns, A., & Tanaka, T. (2015b). “My Head Became Blank and I Couldn’t Speak”: Classroom Factors That Influence English Speaking. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2(3): 164-175. [Online]. Available: caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/view/230

Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension And Production Processes in Second Language Learning: In Search of The Psycholinguistic Rationale of The Output Hypothesis. Applied Linguistics. 24(2): 168-196. DOI: 10.1093/applin/24.2.168

Juniati, S. R., Jabu, B., & Salija, K. (2018). Students’ Silence in The EFL Speaking Classroom. In Proceeding of The 65th TEFLIN International Conference (pp 90–94). Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

Karnchanachari, S. (2019). An Investigation into Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English in The Classroom: A Study of Thai EFL Students in The Thai and International Programs. rEFLections. 26(2): 83-106. [Online]. Available: so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/241757

Kaur, A., Young, D., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2016). English Education Policy in Thailand: Why the Poor Results? In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.). English Language Education Policy in Asia, Language Policy 11 (pp.345-361). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_16

Kikuchi, K. (2009). Listening To Our Learners’ Voices: What Demotivates Japanese High School Students? Language Teaching Research. 13(4): 453-471. DOI: org/10.1177/1362168809341520

King, J. (2013). Silence In the Second Language Classrooms of Japanese Universities. Applied Linguistics. 34(3): 325-343. DOI: 10.1093/applin/ams043

Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency and Accuracy in The Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English. Applied Linguistics. 27(4): 590-619. DOI: 10.1093/applin/aml029

Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining And Developing Autonomy in East Asian Contexts. Applied Linguistics: 20(1): 71-94. DOI: org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71

Littlewood, W. (2000). Do Asian Students Really Want to Listen and Obey? ELT Journal. 54(1): 31-36. DOI: 10.1093/elt/54.1.31

Mala, D. (2018). Thai English Proficiency Drops, Bangkok Post. [Online]. Available: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1570042/thai-english-proficiency-drops

Mathison, S. (1988). Why Triangulate? Educational Researcher. 17(2): 13-17. DOI: org/10.3102/0013189X017002013

Mayes, E. (2020). Student voice in school reform? Desiring Simultaneous Critique and Affirmation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 41(3): 454-470. DOI: org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1492517

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mitra, D. (2003). Student Voice in School Reform: Reframing Student-Teacher Relationship. McGill Journal of Education. 38(2): 289-304. [Online]. Available: https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/8686/6629

Mitra, D. (2007). Student Voice for School Improvement. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.). In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School (pp. 727-744). The Netherlands: Springer.

Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities. TESOL Quarterly. 38(4): 573-603. DOI: 10.2307/3588281

Morse, J. M. (2009). Mixing Qualitative Methods. Qualitative Health Research. 19: 1523-1524. DOI: 10.1177/1049732309349360.

Murphey, T., Falout, J., Elwood, J., & Hood, M. (2009). Inviting Student Voice. Asian EFL Journal. 36: 1- 25. [Online]. Available: asian-efl-journal.com/PTA-May-2009.pdf

Nelson, E., & Charteris, J. (2021). Student Voice Research as A Technology of Reform in Neo-Liberal Times. Pedagogical, Culture & Society. 29(2): 213-230. DOI: org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1713867

Nishimo, T., & Watanabe, M. (2008). Communication-Oriented Policies Versus Classroom Realities in Japan. TESOL Quarterly. 42(1): 133-138. DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00214.x

O’Leary, Z. (2014). The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Omoniyi, T. (2006). Hierarchy Of Identity. In T. Omoniyi, & G. White (Eds.). The Sociolinguistics of Identity (pp. 11-33). London: Continuum.

Parr, J., & Hawe, E. (2020). Student Pedagogic Voice in The Literacy Classroom: A review. Research Papers in Education. DOI: org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864769

Pattapong, K. (2015). Complex Interactions of Factors Underlying Thai EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English. PASAA. 49(January – June): 105-136. [Online]. Available: culi.chula.ac.th/publicationsonline/files/article/T2LG74WCgaTue14959.pdf

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). USA: Sage.

Pekrul, S., & Levin, B. (2007). Building Student Voice for School Improvement. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.). In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School (pp. 711-726). The Netherlands: Springer.

Ping, W. (2010). A Case Study of An In-Class Silent Postgraduate Chinese Student in London Metropolitan University: A Journey of Learning. TESOL Journal. 2: 207-214. [Online]. Available: tesol-international-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/A14V2_TESOL.pdf

Reda, M. M. (2012). Between Speaking and Silence: A Study of Quiet Students. New York: SUNY Press.

Rodgers, C. (2006). Attending To Student Voice: The Role of Descriptive Feedback in Learning and Teaching. Curriculum Inquiry. 36(2): 209-237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00353.x

Rudduck, J. (2007). Student Voice, Student Engagement, And School Reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.). In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School (pp. 587-610). The Netherlands: Springer.

Rudduck, J. & Flutter, J. (2004). How To Improve Your School: Giving Pupils A Voice. London: Continuum Press.

Rungwarapong, P. (2019). Factors Affecting Thai Students’ Participation in Dialogic Talks in EFL Classes: Students’ Perspectives. Social Science Asia. 5(1): 12-21. [Online]. Available: socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/146

Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing Two Pairs of Shoes: Language Teaching in Japan. ELT Journal. 58(2): 155-163. DOI: 10.1093/elt/58.2.155

Sasaki, Y., & Ortlieb, E. (2017). Investigating Why Japanese Students Remain Silent in Australian University Classrooms. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication. 27(1): 85-98. DOI: 10.1075/japc.27.1.05sas

Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm, And Possibility. Michigan: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Schwab, J. J. (1969). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum. The School Review. 78(1): 1-23. DOI: org/10.1080/00220272.2013.809152

Schwab, J. J. (1971). The Practical: Arts of Eclectic. The School Review. 79(4): 493-542. DOI: org/10.1086/442998

Schwab, J. J. (1973). The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum. The School Review. 81(4): 501-522. DOI: org/10.1086/443100

Schwab, J. J. (1983). The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry. 13(3): 239-265. DOI: org/10.1080/03626784.1983.11075885

Schulz, K. (2003). Listening: A Framework for Teaching Across Differences. New York: Teachers College Press.

Spada, N. (2019). Classroom Observation Research. In Schwieter, J. W., & Benati, A. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning (pp. 186-207). London: Cambridge University Press.

Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basic of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. California: Sage.

Sukhapabsuk, D. (2012). Thai University Students’ and Teachers’ Identification of Factors Affecting Student Classroom Behaviors. In Refereed Proceedings in Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Annual Conference (pp. 68-88). School of Education, Curtin University, Australia.

Suvongse, N., & Chanyoo, N. (2019). Factors Contributing to Willingness to Communicate in English of Thai Undergraduate Students in The Immersion Program. In Proceedings of the University of Essex Postgraduate Conference (LangUE). University of Essex, United Kingdom.

Swain, M. (2005). Three Functions of Output in Second Language Learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.). Principles And Practices in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teng, B., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2015). Teaching And Learning English in Thailand and The Integration of Conversation Analysis (CA) Into the Classroom. English Language Teaching. 8(3): 13-23. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1075215.pdf:

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.

Wu, H. (2019). Reticence In the EFL Classroom: Voices from Students in A Chinese University. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 8(6): 114-125. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.6p.114

Xie, X. (2010). Why Are Students Quiet? Looking At the Chinese Context and Beyond. ELT Journal. 64(1): 10-20. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccp060

Yahsima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated Willingness to Communicate in An L2: Interplay of Individual Characteristics and Context. Language Teaching Research. 22(1): 115-137. DOI: 10.1177/1362168816657851

Zhou, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). A Study of Reticence in College EFL Classrooms: The Role of Diffusion of Responsibility. English Language Teaching. 13(6): 133-143. [Online]. Available: https:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1255433.pdf