The Development of Connectivism Mobile Learning Expert System for Competency Advice on Job Positioning in Cooperative Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: A significant issue facing the Thai construction industry is the fact that civil engineers' actual performance falls below the industry standards. To address this issue, this research developed the mobile connectivism learning expert system that assists with dispensing requisite competency advice for users. It aims to help fulfill industry demands by offering competency advice that civil engineering graduates need to maximize their potential.
Methodology: The research samples were divided into two groups: (1) 410 civil engineering experts who supervised civil engineering students in a cooperative education program, and (2) 127 civil engineering students in a cooperative education program. A questionnaire was used to collect information. Statistical data analysis included use of percentage, mean, standard deviation, and confirmatory factor analysis.
Main results: Firstly, the competencies that are significant for the self-assessment of cooperative education students in civil engineering consist of three main groups, including professional knowledge and skills, practical knowledge and skills, and attributes. Secondly, the expert system that was developed functions as a responsive web application, accommodating devices with varying screen sizes. It can be used on smartphones, tablets, mobile computers, and personal computers. It uses PHP language, developed mainly for use in smartphones, and users can choose from the following three types of use: (1) The evaluation of cooperative education positions, (2) The recommendations based on cooperative education job positions, (3) and competency-based recommendations. Thirdly, the connectivism mobile learning expert system offers a high level of connectivism in terms of autonomy, diversity, interaction, and openness. Fourthly, learning outcomes from the Connectivism mobile learning environment in the expert system are rated at a high level. Regarding the usability testing of the expert system, the students agreed with the positive points and disagreed with or were not sure about the negative points.
Discussion: The connectivism mobile learning in this expert system allows students to develop competencies that are suitable for cooperative education positions without the limitations of place and time. The diversity in learning encourages learners to participate in a variety of readings. There are a variety of environments and diverse discussions. Learning independence encourages students to create a learning plan and track their own learning. Interaction is promoted between students and learners, and open participation removes restrictions that might hinder involvement. However, stimulation and assignment may be added during the use of the mobile associative learning specialist system to further support learning. Additionally, this connectivism mobile learning expert system aligns with the benefits of self-learning by encouraging students to create learning programs and closely evaluate their own progress. On the other hand, students participating in cooperative education must be passionate about creating their own lesson plans and reviewing what they have learned. It will be used effectively and efficiently, according to the connectivism mobile learning expert system.
Conclusion: This connectivism mobile learning expert system can be applied so that students can evaluate job positions that are suitable for their own competencies and receive advice on developing competencies to be suitable for cooperative education positions effectively.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Awad, E. M. (1995). Building expert system: Principle, procedure, and applications. West Publishing.
Badiru, B. & Cheung, J. Y. (1952). Fuzzy engineering expert systems with neural network applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Booitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-173.
Borel, D. A. (2013). The influence of web conferencing on graduate students’ sense of community in an online classroom. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lamar University, Texas.
Brasher, A. & Taylor, J. (2004). Development of a research plan for use of ambient technology to test mobile learning technologies. In Mobile Learning Anytime Everywhere: A Book of Paper from MLEARN (pp. 33-38), London.
Canadian Association of Cooperative Education (CAFCE). (2000). Co-operative Education Manual A Guide to Planning and Implementing Co-operative Education Programs in Post-Secondary Institutions. Canada: CAFCE, 2000.
Downes, S. (2023). Newer Theories for Digital Learning Spaces.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_8.pdf
El-Hussein, M. O. M. & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
Groenewald, T. (2004). Towards a definition for cooperative education. In International Handbook for Cooperative Education: An International Perspective of the Theory, Research and Practice of Work-Integrated Learning (pp. 17-25). Coll, R.K. & Eames, C., Ed. Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.
Groenewald, T., Drysdale, M., Chiupka, C. & Johnston, N. (2011). Towards a definition and models of practice for cooperative and work-integrated education. In International Handbook for Cooperative and Work-integrated Education: International Perspectives of Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 17-24). Coll, R. K. & Zegwaard, K. E., Ed. MA: World Association for Cooperative Education.
Jeerungsuwan, N. (2010). Connectivism to C5 Model. (In Thai). Journal of Cognitive Technology, 3(1), 9-15.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile usability and user experience. In Mobile Learning: A Handbook of Educators and Trainers (pp. 45-56). Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J., Ed. London: Routledge.
MINT. (2005). Zukai de wakaru software kaihatsu no subete. Tranlated by Kittichaikulkij, S. Bangkok: Technology Promotion Association (Thailand-Japan).
Sangpum, W. (2011). Instructional model based on connectivism theory. (In Thai). Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(2), 50-56.
Schneider, M., Kandel, A., Langholz, G. & Chew, G. (1996). Fuzzy expert system tools. John Wiley & Sons.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J. & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning in mobile age. In SAGE Handbook of E-learning Research (pp. 221-247). Andrews, R. & Haythornthwaite, C., Ed. London: SAGE.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and knowing in network: Changing roles for educators and designers.
Srisa-an, W., Yamnoon, S., & Yawai, A. (2009). Higher education and cooperative education. (In Thai). In N., Raksasuk (Ed.), Provision of cooperative education training (2nd ed., pp. 1-12). Thai Association for Cooperative Education. https://tace.sut.ac.th/tace/download/document/manual-1.pdf
Tiantong, M. (2003). M-learning: New way of e-learning. Education and Communication Technology Journal. 1(1), 3-11.
Tunhikorn, B. (2012). Developing new learner characteristics to support education reform in the second decade with ICT integration in project-based learning management. (In Thai). Office of Education Council.
Wareeprasert, N. & Lamdee, N. (2009). Artificial intelligence. (In Thai). KTP COMP & CONSULT.
Wattanachai, T. (2010). The study of competence expectancy of Civil-Engineering Personnel in Thai construction industry. (In Thai). M.Eng. thesis, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok.
Yamoat, N. & Polnigongit, W. (2019). Appropriate indicators for evaluating the competency of cooperative education students in Civil Engineering. (In Thai). Technical Education Journal: King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 10(2), 101-109.