A Policy Study on Supporting Safe Motorcycle Travel in Urban Areas

Main Article Content

Pawinee Iamtrakul
Sararad Chayphong

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In Thailand, road safety has become a pressing issue due to a notable increase in fatalities and injuries from road accidents, with the country ranking 9th globally in road traffic deaths in 2018. Among the various vehicles involved in accidents, motorcycles are identified as the primary contributors to both accidents and fatalities.


Methodology: This study employs content analysis to explore and evaluate policy options aimed at mitigating the risks associated with motorcycle use in Bangkok. By systematically examining existing policies and safety measures, the study seeks to identify effective strategies to enhance motorcyclist safety and reduce the incidence of road traffic injuries and deaths. There are five policy variables adopted in this study including: 1) planning, design, and management of road users, 2) coordination of safety agencies, 3) safety-related legislation, 4) funding for resource allocation, and 5) road safety promotion during inspection monitoring and evaluation. The data were gathered through a survey questionnaire which focused on stakeholders from 25 agencies. The measurement of variables was conducted using the average scores across three levels of importance: low, moderate, and high, for which statistical significance testing was performed.


Main results: The findings indicate that most agencies adhere to the set policies at a moderate to high level. However, when examining the five modes of transportation, which comprise bicycling/walking, motorcycling, car use, public transportation, and para transportation, it was found that the importance scores for motorcycling, bicycling/walking, and semi-public transportation were lower than those for cars and public transportation. This disparity highlights a policy gap, particularly in addressing road safety for vulnerable groups, such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. Furthermore, the current remedial measures do not align with the actual problems faced. Thus, it is imperative to provide recommendations that address these road safety gaps to ensure equity and relevance to the needs of all road users


Discussion: Addressing road safety requires the integration of the Safe System Approach and the development of collaborative frameworks among relevant agencies. The Safe System Approach focuses on designing and managing road systems to be safe for all users, acknowledging that human error is inevitable. This approach is particularly vital for high-risk groups, such as motorcyclists. Implementing safe infrastructure design (e.g., dedicated motorcycle lanes, barrier installations, and appropriate speed limits, etc.) significantly reduces the likelihood and severity of accidents. Dedicated lanes for motorcyclists minimize the risk of collisions with other vehicles, while barriers help prevent encroachments and limit the impact of crashes. Proper speed limits are crucial for controlling vehicle speeds and providing adequate reaction time, thereby enhancing overall road safety.


Conclusion: Furthermore, fostering cooperation among agencies allows motorcyclists to be involved in developing safety measures, ensuring that their needs and perspectives are integrated into effective policies. Promoting a culture of safe riding through education and awareness is also essential. Additionally, promoting safe riding culture and education is crucial in influencing behavioral changes among riders, ultimately enhancing road safety standards and sustainably reducing motorcycle-related accidents.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Alfaro-Basso, D. (2008). Problemática sanitaria y social de la accidentalidad del transporte Terrestre [Health and social problems of land transport accidents]. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública, 25, 133–137.

Bird, F., Germain, G. (1990). Liderazgo práctico en el control de pérdidas [Practical Leadership in the Control of Losses]. Loganville: Det Norske Veritas.

Bliss, T. & Breen, J. (2009). Country guidelines for the conduct of road safety management capacity reviews and the specification of lead agency reforms, investment strategy and safety system project. World Bank Global Road Safety Facility.

Boonratmaitree, A., Nontachit, W., Traisaranakun, N. & Ngammeesri, T. (2017). Paradigm of road safety management. (In Thai). Ph.D. In Social Sciences Journal, 7(1), 1-15.

Department of Land Transport. (2018). Cumulative number of registered vehicles. (In Thai). https://web.dlt.go.th/statistics/

Iamtrakul, P. and Chayphong, S. (2021). The study of risk behavior factors affecting road accidents. (In Thai). NRRU Community Research Journal, 15(3), 30-42.

Iamtrakul, P. and Hokao, K. (2012). The study of urbanization patterns and their impacts on road safety. International Association of Lowland Technology (IALT), 14(2), 60-69.

Iamtrakul, P., Chayphong, S., and Klaylee, J. (2019). Foreign tourist behavior and perception of motorcycle accident risk in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Lowland Technology International, 21(3), 187-196.

Iamtrakul, P., Chayphong, S., Jomnonkwao, S., Champahom, T., Ratanavaraha, V., & Narit Hnoohom (2021b). Managing motorcycle safety through road safety application. (In Thai). Local Administration Journal, 14(2), 143-156.

Iamtrakul, P., Chayphong, S., Shummadtayar, U., Champahom, T., Jomnonkwao, S., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2021a). Development of applications for motorcycle rentals in Chiang Mai through public participation process. (In Thai). Journal of Social Sciences Srinakharinwirot University, 24(1), 116-131.

Iamtrakul, P., Simcharean, P. & Jantaworn, P. (2012). Participation of local communities in road safety through Participation Research Approach (PAR): A case study of Thakhlong Municipality, Pathumthani. (In Thai). JARS, 9(1), 61-81.

Koh, P.P., Wong, Y.D. & Chandrasekar, P. (2014). Safety evaluation of pedestrian behavior and violations at signalized pedestrian crossings. Saf Sci, 70, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.010

Nastasi, B. K. and Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003

National Statistical Office. (2017). Statistics of road traffic accident cases classified by the cause of the accident throughout the Kingdom 2006-2015. (In Thai). https://www.nso.go.th/public/e-book/Statistical-Yearbook/SYB-2549/files/assets/basic-html/page407.html

Phatarakarm, N. (2012). Policy recommendations for injury prevention operations. (In Thai). Division of Non Communicble Disease.

Olszewski, P., Szagała, P., Wolan˙ski, M. & Zielin˙ska, A. (2015). Pedestrian fatality risk in accidents at unsignalized zebra crosswalks in Poland. Accid Anal Prev, 84, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.008

Road Accident Victims Protection Company Limited. (2019). Decade of action for road safety. (In Thai). https://www.rvp.co.th/service_safty.php

SDGmove. (2021). SDG Insights. https://www.sdgmove.com/2021/05/15/sdg-insights-road-safety-thailand/

The Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and planning. (2019). Ministry of Transport's Road accident situation analysis report. (In Thai). http://www.otp.go.th/uploads/tiny_uploads/PDF/2562-09/25620916Accident%20report2561%20_OTP.pdf

Thairoads. (2017). Motorcycle accident rate per 10,000 registered motorcycles. (In Thai). http://trso.thairoads.org/statistic/watch/detail/159

The State of Queensland (Transport and Main Roads). (2022). Safer Roads, Safer Queensland – Queensland’s Road Safety Strategy 2022–31. https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/d28d7b57-2e59-456c-810d-5a4cf9654ddb/queensland-road-safety-strategy-2022-31.pdf?ETag=86607f1e7ec3d5de14e64614325f9a19

Velázquez, Y. & Zamorano, B. (2017). Ruíz L. Siniestralidad vial en la frontera norte de Tamaulipas. Enfoque en los procesos administrativos de control [Road Accident Rate in the Northern Border of Tamaulipas. Focus on Administrative Control Processes]. Estudios Fronterizos, 18(36), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.2017.36.a01

WHO. (2011). The Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/un-road-safety-collaboration/global_launch_doa_2011-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=3562e3d0_3&download=true

WHO. (2015). World road safety situation report 2015. https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-06/9789241565066_eng.pdf

WHO. (2022). Powered two-and three-wheeler safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/363455/9789240060562-eng.pdf?sequence=1

WHO. (2018). World road safety situation report 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277370/WHO-NMH-NVI-18.20-eng.pdf?ua=1