Improving Customer Service Efficiency Using Demand Forecasting with Leagile and Lean Six Sigma Concepts: A Case Study

Main Article Content

Panutporn Ruangchoengchum
Phraewa Thatphet

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The coffee industry is a highly competitive business, especially for coffee shops that providing fresh coffee. Prolonged service times in such establishments can significantly impact activity-based costing. Although previous research has addressed issues related to extended waiting times, there is a gap in understanding how demand forecasting, combined with Leagile and Lean Six Sigma methodologies, can improve service processes in small coffee shops. This study seeks to identify the maximum increase in beverage demand periods through demand forecasting and implement Leagile and Lean Six Sigma strategies to enhance customer service, decrease activity-based costs, and improve overall efficiency.


Methodology: The data on product sales throughout the year 2022 during operating hours was collected from January 1st to December 31st. Python and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) were employed for sales forecasting to find the maximum increasing period of demand, and the accuracy of predictions was evaluated using metrics such as Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants. The application of Leagile and Lean Six Sigma concepts, with various tools such as service blueprint, process flow chart, activity value analysis, and Cause-and-effect diagram, took place over the period from March 1st to April 31st, 2023 to improve the customer service process.


Results: The main findings of the study revealed that peak demand occurred during two specific periods: 07:45-08:00 a.m. and 12:45-01:00 p.m., with increases of 73.2% and 76.8%, respectively. The research identified and addressed five non-value-added activities in the service process which are queuing for ordering, writing down the order on paper, asking for the customer’s name and writing it down on the receipt, folding the tissue paper onto the cup, and choosing the proper straw. Decreasing those processes resulted in a notable 20.71% reduction in lead time (equivalent to 87 seconds per cup). Additionally, four out of five activities (80%) that cause idle time, consist of writing down the order on paper, asking for the customer’s name and writing it down on the receipt, folding the tissue paper onto the cup, and choosing the proper straw, were successfully eliminated. These improvements contributed to an estimated daily reduction of 2,350 baht in activity-based costs, translating to a monthly saving of 61,110 baht.


Discussions: Entrepreneurs should consider using demand forecasting to identify peak times of demand, aiming to enhance the efficiency of customer service processes in conjunction with the Leagile and Lean Six Sigma concepts. This involves collecting and analyzing data, identifying the root causes of problems, selecting an appropriate decoupling point to modify the workflow, and utilizing forecast-driven principles in the Lean model. The workflow is then transformed using order-driven principles in the Agile model. Eliminating non-value-added activities is a crucial method to enhance the efficiency of customer service processes, reducing customer waiting times and minimizing unnecessary business activity-based costs.


Conclusions: Integrating demand forecasting with Leagile and Lean Six Sigma principles proves beneficial for fresh coffee shops, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing unnecessary activity costs.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2016). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Principles of operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (10th ed.). Pearson.

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts.

International Coffee Organization. (2022, April 20, 2023). Annual review coffee year 2021/2022. https://www.ico.org/documents/cy2022-23/annual-review-2021-2022-e.pdf

Leechaianan, S. (2013). Hybrid supply chain (leagility) application in bared wire manufacturing process: A case study. TNI Journal of Business Administration and Languages. 1(1). 1-5.

Kurokawa, Y. (2010). M&A for value creation in Japan (6th ed.). World Scientific.

Moldvaer, A. (2021). The coffee book. DK Publishing.

Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M. & Berry, D. (1997). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain masts working paper no. 47. Republished in International Journal of Production Economics (1999), 62, 107-118. Cited in Goldsby, T. J., Griffis, S. E., & Roath, A. S. (2006). Modeling Lean, Agile, and Leagile supplu chain strategies. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00241.x

OpEx Learning Team. (2010, April 20, 2023). Starbucks waiting time and lean operations. Opexlearning. https://opexlearning.com/resources/starbucks-queueing-theory-constraints-lean/7768

Ounmee, T. (2017). Forecasting and inventory planning to reduce the problem of delayed shipment: A case study of lens manufacturer. Thammasat University.

Pepper, M. P. J., & Spedding, T. A. (2010). The evolution of lean six sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711011014276 cited by Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2020). Big data in LeanSix sigma: A review and further research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(3), 947–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1598599

Phansangwan, P., Suthikarnnarunai, N. & Janpong, S. (2021). Inventory management efficiency improvement: A case study of retail company. Journal of Nakhonratchasima College (Humanities and Social Sciences), 15(3), 391–405.

Pugna, A., Negrea, R., & Miclea, S. (2016). Using six sigma methodology to improve the assembly process in an automotive company. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.120

Python. (n.d.). History and license. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://docs.python.org/3/license.html

Smętkowska, M. & Mrugalska, B. (2018). Using Six sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.039

Supanakorn, J. (2011). Time series forecasting for production planning of bearing parts. The Journal of King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, 21(3), 595–606.

Sethithorn, S. (2019, April 20, 2023). Thailand food market report; Coffee shop business in Thailand. http://fic.nfi.or.th/upload/market_overview/Rep_Cafe_15.01.62.pdf

Thai Kasikorn Research Center. (2018, April 5, 2023). How to manage coffee shop business. https://www.kasikornbank.com/th/business/sme/KSMEKnowledge/article/KSMEAnalysis/Documents/Coffee-Shop-Management.pdf

Thatphet, K. & Ruangchoengchum, P. (2019). An elimination of non-value added movement by organizing production process layout: A case study of fresh coffee shop business in Khon Kaen Province. Journal of Management Science, Ubon Ratchathani University, 10(2). 1-24.

Thonglor, N., Anusasansnun, S., & Anegasukha, S. (2012). A need assessment by using forecast equation for school administration planning. Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal, 7(2), 124–141.

Vasisht, P. (2018, April 20, 2023). The 9-minute takeaway coffee. Medium. https://medium.com/designrover/the-9-minute-takeaway-coffee-67045d359b57

Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. & Wu, L. (2012). Research on demand-driven leagile supply chain operation model: A simulation based on anylogic in system engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.11.027