Perceptions towards English as an International Language: A Study of International Students at a Thai University
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Amid the backdrop of globalization, English has become an international language that people use for various purposes in multilingual and multicultural communication. In teaching practices, British and American English are traditionally recognized as the target models. However, these models have incurred broad criticism for failing to guarantee effective communication. Thus, many studies have been done to investigate students’ perceptions towards English as an international language (EIL). However, limited research has been conducted among international students. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the perceptions of international students at a Thai university towards EIL, and to uncover the reasons underlying their perceptions.
Methodology: This study employed a mixed methods research design to fulfill its research objectives, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. To capture international students’ perceptions towards EIL, a questionnaire was used. A total of 98 international students were initially recruited, but only 83 questionnaires were valid. To unveil the reasons underlying their perceptions, a semi-structured interview was carried out, involving a purposive selection of six international students. The questionnaire data were analyzed using statistical software to calculate the mean, standard deviation, and frequency of each item of the questionnaire. Content analysis was employed to analyze the interviews.
Main Results: Based on the analysis of the five components of EIL perceptions (cultural realism, linguistic and cultural disposition, ownership of English, EIL posture, and localization), the findings revealed that international students held positive perceptions about EIL. Concerning cultural realism, the majority of international students were willing to learn from different cultures when learning English. In terms of linguistic and cultural disposition, international students possessed disputable views towards cultural homogenization and heterogenization. Regarding ownership of English, most international students believed that English belongs to all the users who speak the language, not only native speakers. From the aspect of EIL posture, they recognized the important roles that the English language plays in the world. As for localization, they regarded English as a means to present their own cultures and identities to others in the world. The underlying reasons are that English is a universal language and its users are all from different cultures, and that mutual intelligibility is key for international communication.
Discussions: This study underscores international students’ willingness and desire to embrace different varieties of English and enhance their global cultural awareness, and it highlights the significance of incorporating cultural elements into English language education. Compared to previous studies, international students in this study demonstrate a much greater awareness of EIL due to their overseas learning experiences.
Conclusions: Some pedagogical implications are resultant from this research. English teaching materials should not only be western-culture-oriented but should include a multiplicity of cultures. Different varieties of English should be acceptable in the evaluation and assessment process in the English classroom, and content should be given priority over grammar.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alsagoff, L. (2012). Identity and the EIL Learner. In L. Alsagoff, W. Renandya, G. Hu, & M. S. L. (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 104–122). Routledge.
Block, D. (2004). Globalization and language teaching. ELT Journal, 58(1), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.1.75
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A study of its development. Multilingual Matters.
Chemsripong, S. (2021). Perception and Satisfaction of International Students on Higher Education Services in Thailand. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.14456/JCDR-HS.2021.25
Christou, E., Thomas, N., & McKinley, J. (2022). Chinese pre-service English teachers’ beliefs about English as an international language (EIL). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2148681
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Deniz, M. S., & Alsaffar, A. A. (2013). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire on Dietary Fibre-related Knowledge in a Turkish Student Population. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 31(4), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v31i4.20048
Evison, J., Bailey, L., Taylor, P., & Tubpun, T. (2019). Professional identities of lecturers in three international universities in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia: Multilingual professionals at work. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1608814
Ha, L. P. (2009). English as an international language: International student and identity formation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470902748855
Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, J. (2009). World Englishes: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000115
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, Codification and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press.
Kalra, R., & Thanavisuth, C. (2018). Do you like my English? Thai students’ attitudes towards five different Asian accents. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.21
Kaypak, E., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2014). Language learner beliefs and study abroad: A study on English as a lingua franca (ELF). System, 42, 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.005
Lee, J. S., & Chen, H. J. (2018). University students’ perceptions of English as an International Language (EIL) in Taiwan and South Korea. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(9), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1438448
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Perceptions of English as an international language by Korean English-major and non-English-major students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1480628
Lu, H., & Buripakdi, A. (2020). Effects of Global Englishes-Informed Pedagogy in Raising Chinese University Students’ Global Englishes Awareness. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 60, 97–133.
Marefat, F., & Pakzadian, M. (2017). Attitudes towards English as an International Language (EIL) in Iran: Development and Validation of a New Model and Questionnaire. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(1), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2017.3166
Matsuda, A. (Ed.). (2012). Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
Matsuda, A. (Ed.). (2017). Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an international language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738817
McKay, S. L., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (2008). International English in its sociolinguistic contexts: Towards a socially sensitive EIL pedagogy. Routledge.
Rajprasit, K., & Marlina, R. (2019). An attempt to raise Thai students’ awareness of World Englishes in a General English Program. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v14i1.1416
Schneider, E. W. (2020). English around the world: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Tauchid, A., Saleh, M., & Mujiyanto, J. (2022). English as an international language (EIL) views in Indonesia and Japan: A survey research. Heliyon, 8(10), e10785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10785
Wang, W. (2015). Teaching English as an international language in China: Investigating university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards China English. System, 53, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.008
Wang, Y., & Jenkins, J. (2016). “Nativeness” and Intelligibility: Impacts of Intercultural Experience Through English as a Lingua Franca on Chinese Speakers’ Language Attitudes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2016-0003
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The Ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438
Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters.